Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Noond, Jez; Schofield, Damian; March, Jack; Evison, Martin (2002)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: F400
In the UK forensic animations are becoming an increasingly important visual aid in courtroom situations, where complex data relating to a sequence of events is being visualised before a general public who may have little or no understanding of established forensic procedure or methodology. This paper will introduce and discuss a spectrum of new technologies that utilise new developments in Computer Graphics (CG) and Virtual Reality (VR) for a range of incident investigation and presentation scenarios.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Denby, B and Schofield, D, Role of Virtual Reality in Safety Training, Mining Engineering, October 1999: 59 - 64.
    • 2. Schofield, D, Denby, B and Hollands, R. Mine Safety in the Twenty-First Century: The Application of Computer Graphics and Virtual Reality, In: Karmis, M. ed. Mine Health and Safety Management. Colorado: Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., 2001: 153-174.
    • 3. Krieger, R. Sophisticated Computer Graphics Come of Age-and Evidence Will Never Be the Same, A.B.A. Journal 1992; Dec.
    • 4. Lederer, FI. Technology comes to the courtroom. Emory Law Journal 1994; 43: 1095-1113.
    • 5. O'Flaherty, D. Computer-generated displays in the courtroom: for better or worse? Web JCLI 1996; 4 (URL: http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1996/issue4/oflah4.html).
    • 6. Marriott, A. Alexandria firm courts lawyers by proving animation computes. The Washington Times 1996: November 25.
    • 7. Lederer, FI. Courtroom 21: A Model Courtroom of the 21st Century. Court Technology Bulletin 1994; 6:1.
    • 8. Collier, P and Spaul, B. A Forensic Methodology for Countering Computer Crime. In: Carr, I and Williams, K, ed. Computers and Law. Oxford: Intellect 1994.
    • 9. Borelli, M. The computer as advocate: an approach to computer-generated displays in the courtroom. Indiana Law Journal 1996; 71:2.
    • 10. Fisher, P. Should We Believe The New Realism. The Daily Telegraph 1998: June 18.
    • 11. Elliot, DW. Videotape evidence: the risk of over-persuasion. Criminal Law Review 1998: 159-174.
    • 12. Douglas, EJ. Violent crime scene analysis: modus operandi, signature, and staging, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, February 1992.
    • 13. Girvan, R. Computer animations used In litigation, Forensic Science Society Newsletter 2001; July: 4-5.
    • 14. Schofield, D. Recreating reality - reconstructing accidents using computer graphics. Criminal Justice Management 2001; February: 9-11.
    • 2 Dr. Damian Schofield Lecturer, SChEME, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. +44 (0) 115 951 4084
    • 3 Mr. Jack March Researcher, SChEME, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. +44 +44 (0) 115 951 4094 4 Dr. Martin Evison Senior Lecturer, Forensic and Biological Anthropology, The Department of Forensic Pathology, The University of Sheffield, The Medico-Legal Centre, Watery Street, Sheffield S3 7ES, UK. +44 (0) 114 273 8721
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article