Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fuchs, Susane; Perrier, Pascal
Publisher: Universitat AutÒnoma de Barcelona
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Except for cavity enlargement strategies there is not much consensus about the involvement of supralaryngeal move-ments in the production of the voicing contrast. In order to study supralaryngeal stop production mechanisms we in-vestigated the kinematics of tongue tip and jaw as well as tongue-palate contact patterns for four German subjects. We took alveolar stops in word medial (Cm) and word final position (Cf) into account. Results from Cm provide evidence that even though acoustic results exhibited consistently a longer closure duration for the voiceless stops, speaker-dependent articulatory mechanisms were involved. In word final position the rule of final devoicing applies in German, i.e. voiced stops are neutralised to voiceless. Results from acoustics and EPG generally showed complete neutralisation, but some differences, par-ticularly in jaw position at the consonantal target and in tongue-jaw coordination, are still maintained.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] P.A. Dagenais, L.C. Lorendo & M.J. McCutcheon, “A study of voicing and context effects upon consonant linguapalatal contact patterns”, Journal of Phonetics 22, pp. 225-238, 1994.
    • [2] O. Fujimura & J.E. Miller, ”Mandible height and syllable-final tenseness”, Phonetica 36, pp. 263-272, 1979.
    • [3] W.J. Hardcastle, F. Gibbon & K. Nicolaidis, “EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation”, Journal of Phonetics, vol. 19, pp. 251-266, 1991.
    • [4] M. Jessen, Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
    • [5] R.D. Kent & K.L. Moll, “Vocal-tract characteristics of the stop cognates” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46(6), pp. 1549-1555, 1969.
    • [6] A. Löfqvist & V.L.Gracco, ”Tongue body kinematics in velar stop production: influences of consonant voicing and vowel context”, Phonetica, vol. 51, pp. 52-67, 1994.
    • [7] I. Moen, H.G. Simonsen, M. Huseby, & J. Grue, “The relationship between intraoral air pressure and tongue/palate contact during the articulation of Norwegian /t/ and /d/”, Eurospeech CD-ROM. paper 265, 2001.
    • [8] H.G. Piroth & P.M. Janker, “Speaker-dependent differences in voicing and devoicing of German obstruents”, Journal of Phonetics, (in press).
    • [9] J.R. Westbury, ”Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73(4), pp. 1322-1336.
    • [10] C. Mooshammer, A. Geumann, P. Hoole, P. Alfonso, P. van Lieshout, S. Fuchs, ”Coordination of lingual and mandibular gestures for different manners of articulation”, (this conference).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article