Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Webb, Brian; Webber, Steven (2017)
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Journal: Cities
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Development, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Sociology and Political Science, G1
Condominium neighbourhoods are emerging in intensifying city centres as a response to market and\ud demographic preferences for homeownership. While the multi-ownership structure of individual\ud condominium buildings accommodates a short-term demand, the long-term implications for\ud neighbourhoods is a source of concern. In particular, the presence of unit owners with varied\ud acquisition objectives can lead to an anticommons problem resulting in building disinvestment due\ud to an inability to reach decisions on sustainable maintenance fees and capital reserve funds, and a\ud lack of end of lifecycle planning. The city of Toronto is experiencing unprecedented condominium\ud development and serves as the basis for a case study that assesses the anticipated future\ud neighbourhood challenges associated with a predominantly condominium-based form of ownership.\ud Twenty-two local stakeholders were interviewed to identify problems that are viewed as sources of\ud concern due to decisions made during the early stages of a building’s lifecycle and the absence of a\ud neighbourhood planning strategy. An analysis of the results indicates that lock-in, lacunae and\ud neighbourhood effects will likely complicate revitalisation efforts as condominium neighbourhoods\ud become more prevalent. Limited stakeholder recognition further suggests that it is necessary to raise\ud a greater awareness of the potential anticommons impediments to long-term collective revitalisation\ud actions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N., & Munjoma, T. (2001). Ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment. Environment & Planning A, 33(3), 453-477.
    • Addison, C., Zhang, S., & Coomes, B. (2013). Smart growth and housing affordability: A review of regulatory mechanisms and planning practices. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(3), 215-257.
    • Brueckner, J., & Rosenthal, S. (2005). Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: will America's future downtowns be rich? WP 1579, CESifo, Munich, Available: http:// www.ifo.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202005/CESifo% 20Working%20Papers%20October%202005/cesifo1 wp1579.pdf.
    • Butler, T. (2007). For gentrification? Environment & Planning A, 39(1), 162-181.
    • Christudason, A. (2009). Property rights: Achieving a fine balance in collective sales of strata developments in Singapore. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(1), 26-41.
    • City of Toronto (2015a). How does the city grow. Available at http://www1.toronto.ca/ City%20Of%20Toronto/City%20Planning/SIPA/Files/pdf/H/HDCG_Final_Revised_ accessible.pdf.
    • City of Toronto (2015b). TOcore phase 1 summary report and phase 2 directions (TE12. 43). Available at: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item= 2015.TE12.43.
    • CMHC (2016). Housing market outlook: Greater Toronto area. Available at: https://www. cmhc-schl.gc.ca/odpub/esub/64319/64319_2016_B01.pdf?fr=1470049905208.
    • Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New build “gentrification” and London's riverside renaissance. Environment & Planning A, 37, 1165-1190.
    • Dredge, D., & Coiacetto, E. (2011). Strata title: Towards a research agenda for informed planning practice. Planning Practice & Research, 26(4), 417-433.
    • Easthope, H., Hudson, S., & Randolph, B. (2013). Urban renewal and strata scheme termination: Balancing communal management and individual property rights. Environment & Planning A, 45(6), 1421-1435.
    • Easthope, H., Warnken, J., Sherry, C., Coiacetto, E., Dredge, D., Guilding, C., ... Reid, S. (2014). How property title impacts urban consolidation: A life cycle examination of multi-title developments. Urban Policy and Research, 32(3), 289-304.
    • Easthope, H., & Randolph, B. (2016). Principal-agent problems in multi-unit developments: The impact of developer actions on the on-going management of strata titled properties. Environment & Planning A, 48(9), 1829-1847.
    • Emporis (2014). High-rise construction in North America: Toronto continues to lead going into, 2014 Available at: http://www.emporis.com/press/press-release/1/high-riseconstruction-in-north-america-toronto-continues-to-lead-going-into-2014.
    • Fennell, L. (2009). Commons, anticommons, semicommons. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series Available: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/457-261.pdf.
    • Ford, R. (1994). Cities and building: Skyscrapers, skid rows, and suburbs. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
    • Gallun, A. (2015). Why a Chicago developer may be coveting your condo. Crain's Chicago business Available: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150613/ISSUE01/ 306139994/why-a-chicago-developer-may-be-coveting-your-condo.
    • Gar-On Yeh, A. (1990). Public and private partnership in urban redevelopment in Hong Kong. International Development Planning Review, 12(4), 361-383.
    • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 13(162), 1243-1248.
    • Harris, D. (2011). Condominium and the City: The rise of the property in Vancouver. Law & social inquiry36(3), 694-726.
    • Harris, D., & Gilewicz, N. (2015). Dissolving condominium, private takings, and the nature of property. In B. Hoops (Eds.), Rethinking expropriation law II: Context, criteria, and consequences of expropriation (pp. 263-297) (The Hague, NL).
    • Heller, M. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621-688.
    • Heller, M. (2013). The tragedy of the anticommons: A concise introduction and lexicon. The modern law review76(1), 6-25.
    • Hirayama, Y. (2005). Running hot and cold in the urban home-ownership market: The experience of Japan's major cities. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(1), 1-20.
    • Ho, D., Yau, Y., Poon, S., & Liusman, E. (2012). Achieving sustainable urban renewal in Hong Kong: Strategy for dilapidation assessment of high rises. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138(2), 153-165.
    • Hulchanski, D. (1988). The evolution of property rights and housing tenure in postwar Canada: Implications for housing policy. Urban law and policy. Urban law and policy, 9(2), 135-156.
    • Johnston, N., & Reid, S. (2013). Multi-owned developments: A life cycle review of a developing research area. Property Management, 31(5), 366-388.
    • Kim, J., Brand, M., Lee, H., & Park, M. (2013). The role of construction companies in the reconstruction process of apartment buildings in Korea. In proceedings of the nineteenth annual pacific-rim real estate society conference. (Melbourne, Australia, 13-16 January).
    • Lehrer, U., Keil, R., & Kipfer, S. (2010). Reurbanization in Toronto: Condominium boom and social housing revitalization. Planning Review, 180(1), 81-90.
    • Lippert, R. (2012). Governing condominiums and renters with legal knowledge flows and external institutions. Law and policy34(3), 263-290.
    • Lippert, R., & Steckle, R. (2016). Conquering condos from within: Condo-isation as urban governance and knowledge. Urban Studies, 53(1), 132-148.
    • Lum, S., Sim, L., & Malone-Lee, L. (2004). Market-led policy measures for urban redevelopment in Singapore. Land Use Policy, 21(1), 1-19.
    • McLaughlin, G. (1982). Toronto condominiums: Past, present and future. Research bulletin 19. Toronto: City of Toronto Planning and Development Department.
    • Michelman, F. (1982). Ethics, economics and the law of property. In J. Roland Pennock, & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Nomos XXIV: Ethics, economics and the law (pp. 3-40). New York: NYU Press.
    • Moroni, S. (2015). Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Planning theory14(3), 248-267.
    • Nelson, C. (2009). The new urbanity: The rise of a new America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), 192-208.
    • Ng, I. (2002). Urban redevelopment in Hong Kong: An examination of the land development corporation. International Journal of Housing Science and Its Applications, 26(2), 113-122.
    • NSW Government (2016). Collective sale and renewal reforms. Available at: http://www. fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/ftw/About_us/Have_your_say/Review_strata_community_ scheme_laws/Collective_sale_and_renewal_reforms.page?.
    • Ontario Supreme Court of Justice (2014). Order in the matter of Simcoe condominium corporation number 32. Court file number 11-1269. Available at http://greatlaw. ca/SCC32PINS/Jan28Order.pdf.
    • Ostler, T. (2014). Background report: Trends and issues in the intensification of downtown Toronto. Available at http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/ backgroundfile-69192.pdf.
    • Persaud, B., & Ramadhin, R. (2011). Investing in condominiums: Strategies, tips and expert advice for the Canadian real estate investor. New York City: Wiley.
    • Poppe, W., & Young, D. (2015). The politics of place: Place-making versus densification in Toronto's tower neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(3), 613-621.
    • Pow, C. (2011). Living it up: Super-rich enclave and transnational elite urbanism in Singapore. Geoforum, 42(3), 382-393.
    • Province of Ontario (2016). Condominium law changes. Available at: https://www. ontario.ca/page/condominium-law-changes.
    • Public Policy Forum (2013). Ontario's condominium act review: Stage one findings report. Available at: http://www.ppforum.ca/sites/default/files/Full_Condominium% 20Act_EN_0.pdf.
    • Rosen, G., & Walks, A. (2013). Rising cities: Condominium development and the private transformation of the metropolis. Geoforum, 49, 160-172.
    • Rosenthal, S., & Helsley, R. (1994). Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(2), 182-200.
    • Sanati, M. (2016). Neighbour vs. neighbor. Toronto life. Available at: torontolife.com/realestate/condos/condowars-neighbour-vs-neighbour.
    • Schulz, N., Parisi, F., & Depoorter, B. (2002). Fragmentation in property: Towards a general model. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 158(4), 594-613.
    • Scott, A. (2011). Emerging cities of the third wave. City, 15(3), 289-321.
    • Sim, L., Lum, S., & Malone-Lee, L. (2002). Property rights, collective sales and government intervention: Averting a tragedy of the anticommons. Habitat International, 26(4), 457-470.
    • Skaburskis, A. (1988). The nature of Canadian condominium submarkets and their effect on the evolving urban spatial structure. Urban Studies, 25(2), 109-123.
    • Skaburskis, A. (2010). Gentrification in the context of 'risk society'. Environment & Planning A., 42(4), 895-912.
    • Slaev, A. (2016). Types of planning and property rights. Planning theory15(1), 23-41.
    • Statistics Canada (2011). Condominium dwellings in Canada. Catalogue no. 99-014- X2011003, minister of industry. Available at: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhsenm/2011/as-sa/99-014-x/99-014-x2011003_1-eng.cfm.
    • Steele, M. (1993). Conversions, condominiums and capital gains: The transformation of the Ontario rental housing market. Urban Studies, 30(1), 103-126.
    • Troy, L., Easthope, H., Randolph, B., & Pinnegar, S. (2016). It depends what you mean by the term rights: Strata termination and housing rights. Housing studies, online first, 1-16.
    • urbanToronto (2015). urbanToronto dataBase. Avilable at http://urbantoronto.ca/ database/.
    • Warnken, J., Russell, R., & Faulkner, B. (2003). Condominium developments in maturing destinations: Potentials and problems of long-term sustainability. Tourism Management, 24(2), 155-168.
    • West, M., & Morris, E. (2003). The tragedy of the condominiums: Legal responses to collective action problems after the Kobe earthquake. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 51(4), 903-940.
    • Yau, Y., & Chan, H. L. (2008). To rehabilitate or redevelop? A study of the decision criteria for urban regeneration projects. Journal of Place Management and Development, 1(3), 272-291.
    • Yelaja, P. (2012). The manhattanization of Toronto will change family housing dreams. CBC news Available: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/the-manhattanization-oftoronto-will-change-family-housing-dreams-1.1137590.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article