LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Maddrell, A. (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Wherever there is an established ‘canon’ within an established scholarly arena, this is near universally dominated by texts written by men. Whilst\ud historical contextual reasons may account for the gendering of such knowledge production in relation to publications dating from the nineteenth and\ud preceding centuries, one has to ask why this has persisted in an era of equal access to education and academia in the twentieth century. Why is women’s\ud work, highly influential in its day, overlooked in subsequent histories of the discipline and therefore marginalised in discussions of key works? These questions are particularly pertinent to any notion of a geographical canon, given the subject’s relatively late arrival as a degree award in the UK from 1917 onwards. This paper draws on an analysis of the significance of lineage, reviewing, reputation and genre in the contextualised production and reception of selected work to explore the merits and demerits of a geographical canon e and the implications for gendered geographical knowledge. It goes on to suggest i) a more inclusive and dialogic relational approach to understanding past and present geographical work based on Kilcup’s notion of the ‘soft canon’; ii) a broadening of the cast and range of outputs considered ‘influential’; and iii) encourages greater critical reflection on contemporary practices of canonization within sub-disciplines.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Asada, T. 2001. Nonlinear dynamics of debt and capital: a Post-Keynesian analysis. In Y. Aruka (Ed.) Evolutionary Controversies in Economics (Tokyo: Springer-Verlag).
    • Barbosa-Filho, N., 2015, Elasticity of substitution and social conflict: a structuralist note on Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-first Century, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Advance Access.
    • Barbosa-Filho, N., and Taylor, L. 2006. Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy - a structuralist Goodwin model. Metroeconomica 57, (3): 389-411 Charles, S., 2008. Teaching Minsky's financial instability hypothesis: a manageable suggestion.
    • Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31, 1: 125-38 Chauvet, E., Paullet, J., Previte, J. and Walls, Z. 2002. A Lotka Volterra three-species food chain.
    • Mathematics Magazine 75, 4: 253-55 Desai, M. 1984. An econometric model of the share of wages in national income: UK 1855-1965. In R. M. Goodwin (Ed.) Non-linear models of fluctuating growth, (pp. 253-77). Berlin: Springer.
    • Desai, M., Henry, P., Mosley, A. and Pemberton, M. 2006. A clarification of the Goodwin model of the growth cycle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, pp. 2661-2670.
    • Fazzari, S., Ferri, P. and Greenberg, E., 2008. Cash flow, investment, and Keynes-Minsky cycles.
    • Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 3-4, 555-572 Flaschel, P., and Groh, G. 1995. The classical growth cycle: reformulation, simulation and some facts.
    • Economic Notes, 24, 293-326.
    • Flaschel, P., Groh, G., Kauermann, G., and Teuber T. 2010. The Goodwin Distributive Cycle After Fifteen Years of New Observations, in Flaschel, P. (ed.), Topics in Classical Micro- and Macroeconomics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg Flaschel, P. and Proaño C. 2007. AS-AD Disequilibrium dynamics and the Taylor interest rate policy rule: Euro-Area based estimation and simulation. In: Aspects of Modern Monetary and Macroeconomic Policies. Ed. P. Arestis, E. Hein and E. Le Heron. Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan Goldstein, J. P. 1999a. Predator-Prey Model Estimates of the Cyclical Profit Squeeze.
    • Metroeconomica 50, 2, pp. 139-173.
    • Goldstein, J.P. 1999b. The simple analytics and empirics of the cyclical profit squeeze and cyclical underconsumption theories: clearing the air. Review of Radical Political Economics, 1999, 31(2), pp.
    • 74-88 Goldstein, J. P. 2002. The profit squeeze is supported by the PW cycle indicator. Review of Radical Political Economics, 34, 75-77.
    • Goodwin, R.M., 1967. A Growth Cycle, in C.H. Feinstein, editor, Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Goodwin, R.M. 1972, A Growth Cycle, in Hunt, E.K. and Schwartz, J.G. (eds.), A Critique of Economic Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin (revised version of Goodwin, 1967) Harvie, D. 2000. Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24: 349-76 Hein, E., and Vogel, L. 2008. Distribution and growth reconsidered - empirical results for six OECD countries, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32: 479-511.
    • Keen, S. 1995. Finance and economic breakdown modelling Minsky's 'financial instability hypothesis,' Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17, pp. 607-635.
    • Kiefer, D, and Rada, C, 2015. Profit maximizing goes global: the race to the bottom Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (5): 1333-1350 Lavoie, M. and Seccareccia, M. 2001. Minsky's financial Fragility Hypothesis: A Missing Macroeconomic Link? In P. Ferri and R. Bellofiore (Eds.), Financial Fragility and Investment in the Capitalist Economy: The Economic Legacy of Hyman Minsky, volume II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Lotka, A.J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins.
    • Mohun, S, and Veneziani R. 2008. Goodwin Cycles and the U.S. Economy 1948-2004. In: Mathematical Economics and the Dynamics of Capitalism, ed. P. Flaschel and M. Landesmann.
    • Routledge, 2008. Chapter 6, pp.107-130 Naastepad, C.W.M., and Storm S. 2006/7. OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of PostKeynesian Economics, 29: 213-248.
    • Nolting, B, Paullet, J, and Previte, J. 2008. Introducing a scavenger onto a predator prey model.
    • Applied Mathematics E-Notes 8, 214-22 Onaran, Ö., Galanis, G. 2014, "Income distribution and growth: a global model" Environment and Planning A 46(10) 2489-2513 Shah, A. and Desai, M. 1981, Growth cycles with induced technical change, The Economic Journal , Vol. 91, No. 364 (Dec.) , pp. 1006-1010.
    • Sherman, H. 1979. A Marxist theory of the business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics, 11, 1-23.
    • Sherman, H. 1997. Theories of cyclical profit squeeze. Review of Radical Political Economics, 29, 139- 147.
    • Solow, R. M. 1990. Goodwin's growth cycle: reminiscence and rumination. In K. V. Velupillai (Ed.) Multisectoral Macrodynamics. London: Macmillan.
    • Stockhammer, E. 2004. Is there an equilibrium rate of unemployment in the long run? Review of Political Economy: 16 (1) 59-77 Stockhammer, E., Onaran Ö. and Ederer S. 2009. Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area. Cambridge Journal of Economics: 33 (1): 139-159 Stockhammer, E, Stehrer, R. 2011. Goodwin or Kalecki in demand? Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the short run. Review of Radical Political Economics 43(4), 506-522 Skott, P. 1989. Effective demand, class struggle and cyclical growth. International Economic Review, 30, 1 , pp. 231-247 Skott, P. 1994. On the modeling of systemic financial fragility. In: Dutt (ed.): New Directions in Analytical Political Economy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
    • Veneziani, R. and Mohun, S. 2006. Structural stability and Goodwin's growth cycle, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17, pp. 437-451.
    • Volterra, V. 1926. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi, Mem.
    • Accademia die Lincei, Roma, 2, 31--113
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article