LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Piper, Stewart (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education, health care economics and organizations
OBJECTIVE: To describe the meaning of the theme of empowerment from research on health promotion in nursing from the perspective of nurses participating in the study. METHODS: Manual data analysis and QSR NUD*IST Vivo were used to analyse the data generated by individual and focus group interviews and the critical incident technique with 32 qualified nurses working in an acute hospital setting in the UK. RESULTS: The participants identified a number of issues related to the theme of empowerment. These included the nurse as patient informer, psychological supporter and rapport builder and the concepts of informed choice/decision making, gatekeeping, coping, patient assertiveness, self-esteem and confidence. CONCLUSION: Empowerment is a complex, multi-dimensional, contested concept which can reflect a broad socio-political agenda, a radical emancipatory process or, as the findings from this qualitative study suggest, pragmatic interventions operating within the confines of a slightly modified medical model. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If the reader deems the findings are transferable to their clinical milieu then the implications for practice relate to the need for careful consideration about empowerment in relation to operational definitions for practice, how terminology and related intervention is contextualised and the relationship between pragmatic empowerment and the medical paradigm.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Tones K, Tilford S. Health promotion: effectiveness, efficiency and equity, 3rd ed., London: Nelson Thornes; 2001.
    • [2] Tones K, Green J. Health promotion: planning and strategies. London: Sage; 2004.
    • [3] Piper SM. Health promotion for nurses: theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009.
    • [4] Department of Health. Saving lives: our healthier nation. London: HMSO; 1999.
    • [5] Department of Health. The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: HMSO; 2000.
    • [6] Department of Health. Choosing health: making healthy choices easier. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    • [7] Department of Health. Patient and pubic involvement in health: the evidence of policy implementation. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    • [8] Seddon J. Systems thinking in the public sector. Axminster: Triarchy Press; 2008.
    • [9] Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: Department of Health; 2001.
    • [10] Department of Health. Patient advice and liaison service. London: Department of Health; 2002.
    • [11] Department of Health. Long-term conditions information strategy: supporting the National Service Framework for long-term conditions. London: Department of Health; 2005.
    • [12] Salmon P, Hall GM. Patient empowerment or the emperor's new clothes? J Royal Soc Med 2004;97:53-6.
    • [13] Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:829-40.
    • [14] Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc 1995;152:1423-35.
    • [15] Stewart M, Belle J, Brown P, Donner A, McWhinney I, Oates J, et al. The impact of patient-centred care on outcomes. J Fam Prac 2000;49:796-804.
    • [16] Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. Brit Med J 2001;322:444- 5.
    • [17] Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patientcentred communications, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:907-15.
    • [18] Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J. Socioeconomic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns 2005;56:139-46.
    • [19] Lewin D, Piper SM. Patient empowerment within a coronary care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007;23:81-90.
    • [20] Lovemore L, Dann KL. Empowerment in nursing: the role of philosophical and psychological factors. Nurs Philos 2002;3:234-9.
    • [21] Cribb A, Duncan P. Health promotion and professional ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002.
    • [22] Hewitt-Taylor J. Challenging the balance of power: patient empowerment. Nurs Stand 2004;18:33-7.
    • [23] McQueen D, White PD, Fuller R, Sharpe MC. Discomfort of patient power. Brit Med J 2002;324:1214.
    • [24] Scriven A. Promotion health: perspectives, principles, practice. In: Scriven A, editor. Health promoting practice: the contribution of nurses and allied health professionals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
    • [25] Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. California: Addison-Wesley; 1984.
    • [26] Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: theory and practice. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.
    • [27] Carey MA. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In: Morse J, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 225-41.
    • [28] Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. Brit Med J 1995;311:299-302.
    • [29] Twelker PA. The critical incident technique: a manual for its planning and implementation; 2003, http://wvvw.tiu.edu/psychology/Twelker/critical_incident_technique.htm.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article