LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Davies, Zoe G.; Edmondson, Jill L.; Heinemeyer, Andreas; Leake, Jonathan R.; Gaston, Kevin J. (2011)
Publisher: Blackwell
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QH75
1. Despite urbanization being a major driver of land-use change globally, there have been few attempts to quantify and map ecosystem service provision at a city-wide scale. One service that is an increasingly important feature of climate change mitigation policies, and with other potential benefits, is biological carbon storage. \ud \ud 2. We examine the quantities and spatial patterns of above-ground carbon stored in a typical British city, Leicester, by surveying vegetation across the entire urban area. We also consider how carbon density differs in domestic gardens, indicative of bottom-up management of private green spaces by householders, and public land, representing top-down landscape policies by local authorities. Finally, we compare a national ecosystem service map with the estimated quantity and distribution of above-ground carbon within our study city. \ud \ud 3. An estimated 231 521 tonnes of carbon is stored within the above-ground vegetation of Leicester, equating to 3.16 kg C m(-2) of urban area, with 97.3% of this carbon pool being associated with trees rather than herbaceous and woody vegetation. \ud \ud 4. Domestic gardens store just 0.76 kg C m(-2), which is not significantly different from herbaceous vegetation landcover (0.14 kg C m(-2)). The greatest above-ground carbon density is 28.86 kg C m(-2), which is associated with areas of tree cover on publicly owned/managed sites. \ud \ud 5. Current national estimates of this ecosystem service undervalue Leicester's contribution by an order of magnitude. \ud \ud 6. Synthesis and applications. The UK government has recently set a target of an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, from 1990 levels, by 2050. Local authorities are central to national efforts to cut carbon emissions, although the reductions required at city-wide scales are yet to be set. This has led to a need for reliable data to help establish and underpin realistic carbon emission targets and reduction trajectories, along with acceptable and robust policies for meeting these goals. Here, we illustrate the potential benefits of accounting for, mapping and appropriately managing above-ground vegetation carbon stores, even within a typical densely urbanized European city.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Antrop, M. (2000) Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15, 257-270.
    • Bolund, P. & Hunhammar, S. (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301.
    • Britt, C. & Johnson, M. (2008) Trees in Towns II: A New Survey of Urban Trees in England and their Condition and Management. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
    • Chen, Y. & Wong, N.H. (2006) Thermal benefits of city parks. Energy and Buildings, 38, 105-120.
    • Condit, R. (1998) Tropical Forest Census Plots. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and R.G. Landes Company, Georgetown.
    • Dallimer, M., Tang, Z.Y., Bibby, P.R., Brindley, P., Gaston, K.J. & Davies, Z.G. (in press) Temporal changes in greenspace in a highly urbanized region. Biology Letters, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0025.
    • DCLG (2006) Code for Sustainable Homes: A Step-Change in Sustainable Home Building Practice. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
    • Dyson, K.E., Mobbs, D.C. & Milne, R. (2009) Annual inventory estimates for the UK (WP 1.1). Inventory and Projections of UK Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks due to Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (ed K.E. Dyson), pp. 13-49. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
    • Fern a´ndez-Juricic, E. & Jokima¨ ki, J. (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 2023-2043.
    • Freedman, B. (1995) Environmental Ecology: the Ecological Effects of Pollution Disturbance and Other Stresses, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego.
    • Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (2007) Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390-394.
    • Gaston, K.J. (2010) Urban Ecology. Urban Ecology (ed K.J. Gaston), pp. 1-9. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Gehrt, S.D. & Chelsvig, J.E. (2004) Species-specific patterns of bat activity in an urban landscape. Ecological Applications, 14, 625-635.
    • Gill, S.E., Handley, J.F., Ennos, A.R., Pauleit, S., Theuray, N. & Lindley, S.J. (2008) Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 210-222.
    • Golubiewski, N.E. (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado's front range. Ecological Applications, 16, 555-571.
    • Goode, D. (2006) Green Infrastructure. Report to the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London.
    • Great Britain (2008) Climate Change Act 2008: Elizabeth II. Chapter 27. The Stationery Office, London.
    • Gregg, J.W., Jones, C.G. & Dawson, T.E. (2003) Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City. Nature, 424, 183-187.
    • Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. & Briggs, J.M. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756-760.
    • Hansen, A.J., Knight, R.L., Marzluff, J.M., Powell, S., Brown, K., Gude, P.H. & Jones, A. (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms and research needs. Ecological Applications, 15, 1893-1905.
    • Hulme, M., Jenkins, G., Lu, X., Turnpenny, J., Mitchell, T., Jones, R., Lowe, J., Murphy, J., Hassell, D., Boorman, P., McDonald, R. & Hill, S. (2002) Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: the UKCIP02 Scientific Report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich.
    • Jim, C.Y. & Chen, W.Y. (2008) Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 665-676.
    • Jo, H.-K. (2002) Impacts of urban greenspace on offsetting carbon emissions for middle Korea. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 115-126.
    • Jo, H.-K. & McPherson, E.G. (1995) Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 109-133.
    • Jo, H.-K. & McPherson, E.G. (2001) Indirect carbon reduction by residential vegetation and planting strategies in Chicago, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 61, 165-177.
    • Kinzig, A.P., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D. & Katti, M. (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecology and Society, 10, 23.
    • LAEC (2007) Chainsaw Massacre: a Review of London's Street Trees. Greater London Authority, London.
    • Leicester City Council (2009) http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/council-and-democracy/city-statistics/ (last accessed December 2009).
    • MacFarlane, D.W. (2009) Potential availability of urban wood biomass in Michigan: implications for energy production, carbon sequestration and sustainable forest management in the USA. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 628- 634.
    • McHale, M.R., Burke, I.C., Lefsky, M.A., Peper, P.J. & McPherson, E.G. (2009) Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosystems, 12, 95-113.
    • Mansell, M.G. (2003) Rural and Urban Hydrology. Thomas Telford Ltd., London.
    • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Report. Island Press, Washington D.C.
    • Met Office (2009) http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/averages/ (last accessed December 2009).
    • Mette, T., Hajnsek, I. & Papathanassiou, K. (2003) Height-biomass allometry in temperate forests. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2003, pp. 1942-1944. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.
    • Miller, J.R. (2006) Restoration, reconciliation and reconnecting with nature. Biological Conservation, 127, 356-361.
    • Milne, R. & Brown, T.A. (1997) Carbon in the vegetation and soils of Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Management, 49, 413-433.
    • Milne, R., Tomlinson, R.W. & Gauld, J. (2001) The land use change and forestry sector in the 1999 UK greenhouse gas inventory. UK Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks due to Land Use Change and Forestry Activities (ed R. Milne), pp. 11-59. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
    • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R. & Ricketts, T.H. (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 9495-9500.
    • Nowak, D.J. (1993) Atmospheric carbon reduction by urban trees. Journal of Environmental Management, 37, 207-217.
    • Nowak, D.J. (1994) Understanding the structure. Journal of Forestry, 92, 42- 46.
    • Nowak, D.J. & Crane, D.E. (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116, 381-389.
    • Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E. & Stevens, J.C. (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4, 115-123.
    • Nowak, D.J., Stevens, J.C., Sisinni, S.M. & Luley, C.J. (2002) Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 113-122.
    • Pastor, J., Aber, J.D. & Melillo, J.M. (1984) Biomass prediction using generalized allometric regressions for some northeast tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 7, 265-274.
    • Pataki, D.E., Alig, R.J., Fung, A.S., Golubiewski, N.E., Kennedy, C.A., McPherson, E.G., Nowak, D.J., Pouyat, R.V. & Romero Lankao, P. (2006) Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12, 2092-2102.
    • Patenaude, G.L., Briggs, B.D.J., Milne, R., Rowland, C.S., Dawson, T.P. & Pryor, S.N. (2003) The carbon pool in British semi-natural woodland. Forestry, 76, 109-119.
    • Pauleit, S. & Duhme, F. (2000) Assessing the environmental performance of landcover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 1-20.
    • Pouyat, R.V., Yesilonis, I.D. & Nowak, D.J. (2006) Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1566-1575.
    • Profous, G.V., Rowntree, R.A. & Loeb, R.E. (1998) The urban forest landscape of Athens, Greece: aspects of structure, planning and management. Arboricultural Journal, 12, 83-108.
    • Quigley, M.F. (2004) Street tree and rural conspecifics: will long-lived trees reach full size in urban conditions? Urban Ecosystems, 7, 29-39.
    • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    • RHS (2007) Gardening Matters. Royal Horticultural Society, London.
    • Roloff, A., Korn, S. & Gillner, S. (2009) The climate-species-matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 295-308.
    • Rosenzweig, M.L. (2003) Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth's Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Rowntree, R.A. & Nowak, D.J. (1991) Quantifying the role of urban forests in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 17, 269- 275.
    • Schimel, D. (1995) Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 1, 77-91.
    • Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaz´ miercak, A., Niemel a¨, J. & James, P. (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using greenspace infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 167-178.
    • UN (2008) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision. United Nations, New York.
    • UNDP, UNEP, World Bank & WRI (2000) World Resources 2000-2001: People and Ecosystems - the Fraying Web of Life. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
    • Watson, G.W. & Kelsey, P. (2006) The impact of soil compaction on soil aeration and fine root density of Quercus palustris. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4, 69-74.
    • White, E.M., Morzillo, A.T. & Aliga, R.J. (2009) Past and projected rural land conversion in the US at state, regional, and national levels. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89, 37-48.
    • Whitford, V., Ennos, A.R. & Handley, J.F. (2001) ''City form and natural process'' - indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 91-103.
    • Wilby, R.L. & Perry, G.L.W. (2006) Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, UK. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 73-98.
    • Zhao, T., Brown, D.G. & Bergen, K.M. (2007) Increasing gross primary production (GPP) in the urbanizing landscapes of southeastern Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 73, 1159-1168.
    • Zipperer, W.C., Sisinni, S.M. & Pouyat, R.V. (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 229-246.
    • Received 1 November 2010; accepted 15 May 2011 Handling Editor: Richard Wadsworth
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    54
    54%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article