Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sarah Williams PhD; Maria Giatsi Clausen PhD; Ann Robertson PhD; Susi Peacock; Kerri McPherson PhD (2012)
Publisher: SAGE Publishing
Journal: International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Social sciences (General), H1-99
The Internet is increasingly used as a tool in qualitative research. In particular, asynchronous online focus groups are used when factors such as cost, time, or access to participants can make conducting face-to-face research difficult. In this article we consider key methodological issues involved in using asynchronous online focus groups to explore experiences of health and illness. The written nature of Internet communication, the lack of physical presence, and the asynchronous, longitudinal aspects enable participants who might not normally contribute to research studies to reflect on their personal stories before disclosing them to the researcher. Implications for study design, recruitment strategies, and ethics should be considered when deciding whether to use this method.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, J., Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2005). Investigating the “self” in deliberate self-harm. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1293-1309.
    • Adler, C. L. & Zarchin, Y. R. (2002). The “virtual focus group”: Using the internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. Journal of Obstetric, Gyneologic and Neonatal Nursing, 31(4), 418-427.
    • Atkinson, N. L., Saperstein, S. L. & Pleis, J. (2009). Using the internet for health-related activities: Findings from a national probability sample. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(1): e4.
    • Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimmons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.
    • Boshoff, K., Alant, E., & May, E. (2005). Occupational therapy managers' perceptions of challenges faced in early intervention service delivery in South Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 232-242.
    • British Psychological Society (2007). Report of the working party on conducting research on the internet: Guidelines for the ethical practice in psychological research online. Leicester: The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from http://www.bps.org.uk
    • Chen, P. & Hinton, S. M. (1999). Real-time interviewing using the World Wide Web. Sociological Research Online, 4(3), retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html
    • Dickerson S. S. & Feitshans L. A. (2003). Internet users becoming immersed in the virtual world: implications for nurses. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21(6), 300- 308.
    • Ess, C. and the AOIR ethics working committee (Approved by AOIR, November 27, 2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
    • Etherington, K. (2003). Trauma, the body and transformation. E-book: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
    • Finlay, L. (2006). The body's disclosure in phenomenological research. Qualitative research in psychology. 3(1), 19-30.
    • Fox, F. E., Morris, M. & Rumsey, N. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 539- 547.
    • Gaiser, T. (1997) Conducting online focus groups. A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 15 (2), 135-144.
    • Garcia, A.C., Standlee, A.I., Bechkoff, J. and Cui, Y. (2009). Enthrographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(52), 359-387,
    • Illingworth, N. (2001). The internet matters: Exploring the use of the internet as a research tool. Sociological Research Online, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/illingworth.html
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article