LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Grieve, Jack; Asnaghi, Costanza; Ruette, Tom
Publisher: Williams and Wilkins
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This article presents a new method for data collection in regional dialectology based on site-restricted web searches. The method measures the usage and determines the distribution of lexical variants across a region of interest using common web search engines, such as Google or Bing. The method involves estimating the proportions of the variants of a lexical alternation variable over a series of cities by counting the number of webpages that contain the variants on newspaper websites originating from these cities through site-restricted web searches. The method is evaluated by mapping the 26 variants of 10 lexical variables with known distributions in American English. In almost all cases, the maps based on site-restricted web searches align closely with traditional dialect maps based on data gathered through questionnaires, demonstrating the accuracy of this method for the observation of regional linguistic variation. However, unlike collecting dialect data using traditional methods, which is a relatively slow process, the use of site-restricted web searches allows for dialect data to be collected from across a region as large as the United States in a matter of days.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, Harold B. (1973). The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Atwood, E. Bagby. (1962). The Regional Vocabulary of Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    • Baroni, Marco and Kilgarriff, Adam. (2006). Large linguistically-processed web corpora for multiple languages. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 87-90.
    • Bivand, Roger S., Pebesma, Edzer J. and Gomez-Rubio, Virgilio. (2008). Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. New York: Springer.
    • Boberg, Charles. (2005). The North American Regional Vocabulary Survey: New variables and methods in the study of North American English. American Speech 80: 22-60.
    • Carver, Craig. (1987). American Regional Dialects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    • Cassidy, Frederic G. and Hall, Joan Houston. (1985). Dictionary of American Regional English, Volume I: Introduction and A-C. Harvard University Press.
    • Cassidy, Frederic G. and Hall, Joan Houston. (1991). Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume II: D-H. Harvard University Press.
    • Chambers, J.K. (1994). An introduction to dialect topography. English World-Wide 15: 35-53.
    • Chambers, J.K. and Trudgill, Peter. (1998). Dialectology. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press.
    • Davis, Alva L. (1948). A Word Atlas of the Great Lakes Region. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article