Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kaufmann, Eric P.; Harris, G. (2015)
Publisher: Sage
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: polsoc

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: human activities
Does the local presence of immigrant groups increase White hostility to immigration? Most research finds that diverse neighborhoods reduce White opposition to minorities and immigration. However, most studies at higher geographies find the reverse effect. We confirm this pattern for England and Wales for 2009-2012. Yet, contextual studies are open to selection bias, which is where this article makes its main contribution. Is White tolerance in diverse neighborhoods the result of a positive effect of inter-ethnic contact, or does it arise from White flight, with anti-immigrant Whites exiting diverse areas but remaining within wider geographies as radicalized opponents of immigration? We provide the first attempt we are aware of to track the opinions of in- and out-migrants, as well as stayers, from local areas over an extended period. We use 20 years of large-scale geocoded British longitudinal data and find only limited evidence of selection effects associated with White flight.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abrajano, M., & Hajnal, Z. (2009). Latino context and White partisan choices. La Jolla: University of California San Diego.
    • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389-405. doi:10.1348/01 4466608x387089
    • Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., . . . Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629-1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
    • Biggs, M., & Knauss, S. (2012). Explaining membership in the British National Party: A multilevel analysis of contact and threat. European Sociological Review, 28, 633-646. doi:10.1093/esr/jcr031
    • Bishop, B., & Cushing, R. G. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Blalock, H. M. (1957). Per cent non-White and discrimination in the south. American Sociological Review, 22, 677-682.
    • Bowyer, B. (2008). Local context and extreme right support in England: The British National Party in the 2002 and 2003 local elections. Electoral Studies, 27, 611-620.
    • Branton, R. P., & Jones, B. S. (2005). Reexamining racial attitudes: The conditional relationship between diversity and socioeconomic environment. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 359-372. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00128.x
    • British Household Panel Survey. (1991-2009). Waves 1-18: Special licence access, census area statistics wards (UK Data Archive SN#6135). Colchester, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
    • Campbell, A. L., Wong, C., & Citrin, J. (2006). “Racial threat,” partisan climate, and direct democracy: Contextual effects in three California initiatives. Political Behavior, 28, 129-150. doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9005-6
    • Catney, G., & Simpson, L. (2010). Settlement area migration in England and Wales: Assessing evidence for a social gradient. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 571-584.
    • Cho, W. K. T., & Baer, N. (2011). Environmental determinants of racial attitudes redux: The critical decisions related to operationalizing context. American Politics Research, 39, 414-436. doi:10.1177/1532673x10377167
    • Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013). Voter migration and the geographic sorting of the American electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 856-870. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.720229
    • Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2008). Spatial dynamics of White flight: The effects of local and extralocal racial conditions on neighborhood out-migration. American Sociological Review, 73, 792-812.
    • Fetzer, J. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fieldhouse, E., Green, J., Evans, G., Schmitt, H., & van der Eijk, C. (2014). British Election Study Internet Panel: Waves 1-2. Retrieved from www.britishelection study.com/data-objects/panel-study-data/
    • Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. J. (2010). Angry White men: Individual and contextual predictors of support for the British National Party. Political Studies, 58, 1-25.
    • Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. J. (2014). Revolt on the right: Explaining support for the radical right in Britain. London, England: Routledge.
    • Gallego, A., Buscha, F., Sturgis, P., & Oberski, D. (2014). Places and preferences: A longitudinal analysis of self-selection and contextual effects. British Journal of Political Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000337
    • Gay, C. (2006). Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 982-997. doi:10.1111/ j.1540-5907.2006.00228.x
    • Ha, S. E. (2010). The consequences of multiracial contexts on public attitudes toward immigration. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 29-42. doi:10.1177/ 1065912908325255
    • Harris, G. (2012). The rise and fall of the British National Party: The demand for extreme right politics in the UK (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Birkbeck College, University of London, UK.
    • Heath, A., Jowell, R., & Curtice, J. K. (2002, July). British Election Panel Study, 1997-2001; Waves 1 to 8 [Computer file] (4th ed.). Colchester: UK Data Archive [distributor]. Doi:10.5255/UKDA-SN-4028-1
    • Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Paolini, S., McLernon, F., Crisp, R., . . . Craig, J. (2005). Intergroup contact in a divided society: Challenging segregation in Northern Ireland. In D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 265-292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
    • John, P., Margetts, H., Rowland, D., & Weir, S. (2006). The BNP: The roots of its appeal. London, UK: Democratic Audit.
    • Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation (1st ed.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
    • Krysan, M. (2002). Whites who say they'd flee: Who are they, and why would they leave? Demography, 39, 675-696.
    • Leighley, J. (2001). Strength in numbers? The political mobilization of racial and ethnic minorities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • National Centre for Social Research. (2012, February). British Social Attitudes Survey, 2010 [Computer file]. Colchester: UK Data Archive [distributor]. doi:10.5255/ UKDA-SN-6969-1
    • Office for National Statistics. (2013). Census of England and Wales 2011 (Table CT0010 ethnic group (write-in responses), wards in England and Wales). Available from www.ons.gov.uk
    • Office for National Statistics and Home Office. (2010). Communities group, home office citizenship survey, 2009-2010 (UK Data Archive Study No. 673). London, UK: Home Office.
    • Office for National Statistics and Home Office. (2011). Communities group, home office citizenship survey, 2010-2011 (UK Data Archive Study No. 7111). London, UK: Home Office.
    • Oliver, J. E., & Wong, J. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567-582. doi:10.2307/3186119
    • ONS LS. (2001). Office of National Statics. The permission of the Office for National Statistics to use the Longitudinal Study is gratefully acknowledged, as is the help provided by staff of the Centre for Longitudinal Study Information & User Support (CeLSIUS). CeLSIUS is supported by the ESRC Census of Population Programme (Award Ref: RES-348-25-0004). The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data. Census output is Crown copyright and is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.
    • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
    • Putnam, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174.
    • Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat-Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586-611. doi:10.2307/2096296
    • Schlueter, E., & Scheepers, P. (2010). The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39, 285-295. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.006
    • Semyonov, M., & Glikman, A. (2009). Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review, 25, 693-708. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn075
    • Stein, R. M., Post, S. S., & Rinden, A. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 285-303. doi:10.2307/449282
    • U.K. Household Longitudinal Study. (2012). Waves 1-2, 2009-11 (Vol. SN#6614). Colchester: UK Data Archive.
    • van Londen, M. (2012). Exclusion of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: The effects of individual and situational characteristics on opposition to ethnic policy and ethnically mixed neighbourhoods (Doctoral thesis). Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
    • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    • Wong, C., Bowers, J., Williams, T., & Simmons, K. D. (2012). Bringing the person back in: Boundaries, perceptions, and the measurement of racial context. Journal of Politics, 74, 1153-1170. doi:10.1017/s0022381612000552
    • Wright, M., Citrin, J., & Wand, J. (2012). Alternative measures of American national identity: Implications for the civic-ethnic distinction. Political Psychology, 33, 469-482.
    • YouGov. (2013). YouGov/ESRC, Demos and Birkbeck survey results. Retrieved from http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/kf5d231qce/ YG-Archive-ESRC-Demos-Birkbeck-results-300713.pdf
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article