Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hudson, KJ; Taylor, C; Henley, A (2014)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HN
Social scientists, and geographers in particular, have long been interested in examining spatial patterns of offending in order to generate a “geography” of crime and criminality. This paper examines what value, if any, a geographical approach to the study of sexual offending might offer. Utilising published official data from England and Wales it presents for the first time geographical analyses of the registration, risk assessment and management of Registered Sexual Offenders (RSOs) across 42 Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) areas. In doing so it considers and evaluates the methodological issues pertaining to the use of such data and such a geographical approach. We conclude that geographical interpretations of both the incidence of RSOs and the rates of risk allocations between MAPPA areas provide valuable insights and raise new questions about the way in which RSOs are managed nationally and are thus worthy of further exploration.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Bottoms, A. E. (2007). Place, space, crime and disorder. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed., pp. 528-574). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • 2. Burgess, E. W. (1928). The growth of the city. In R. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • 3. Calder, S., & Goodman, A. H. (2013). Transforming rehabilitation, a fiscal motivated approach to offender management.British Journal of Community Justice, 11, 175-188.
    • 4. Chan, V., Homes, A., Murry, L., & Treanor, S. (2010). Evaluation of the offender community disclosure pilot. Scotland: IPSOS MORI.
    • 5. Cohen, J. (1941). The geography of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 217 (1), 29-37. doi:10.1177/000271624121700105 [CrossRef]
    • 6. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608. doi:10.2307/2094589 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    • 7. Connelly, C., & Williamson, S. (2000). Review of the research literature on serious violent and sexual offenders. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • 8. Cowan, D. S., Pantazis, C., Gilroy, R., & Bevan, M. (1999). Housing sex offenders: An examination of current practice. Coventry: Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Chartered Institute of Housing.
    • 9. Cowen, D. S., Pantazis, C., & Gilroy, R. (2001). Social housing as crime control: An examination of the role of housing management in policing sex offenders. Social & Legal Studies, 10, 435. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    • 10. Craig, L., Browne, K. D., & Beech, A. R. (2008). Assessing risk in sex offenders: A practitioner's guide. Chichester: Wiley.[CrossRef]
    • 11. Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy for corrections. Criminology, 30, 449-475. doi:10.1111/j.1745- 9125.1992.tb01112.x [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    • 12. Fitzgibbon, W. (2013). Risk and Justice, 11(2/3), 87-90. privatisation. British Journal of Community
    • 13. Home Office. (2003). MAPPA guidance (version 1). London: Author.
    • 14. Home Office. (2004). MAPPA guidance. Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements. Protection through partnership (version 1.2). London: Author.
    • 15. Hudson, K. (2005). Offending identities: Sex offenders' perspectives of their treatment and management. Devon: Willan.
    • 16. Kemshall, H. (2008). Understanding the community management of high risk offenders (1st ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    • 17. Kemshall, H., Dominey, J., & Hilder, S. (2012). Public disclosure: Sex offenders' perceptions of the pilot scheme in England. Compliance, legitimacy and living a “Good Life”. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 311-324. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
    • 18. Kemshall, H., Wood, D.J., Westwood, S., Stout, B., Wilkinson, B., Kelly, G., & Mackenzie, G. (2010). Child sex offender review (CSOR) public disclosure pilots: A process evaluation, Home Office research report 32. London: Home Office.
    • 19. Kemshall, H., & Wood, J. (2008). Risk and public protection: Responding to involuntary and 'taboo' risk. Social Policy and Administration, 42, 611-629. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 9515.2008.00627.x [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    • 20. Lowman, J. (2005). Conceptual issues in the geography of crime: Toward a geography of social control. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(1), 81-94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1986.tb00105.x [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
    • 21. Miller, J., & Maloney, C. (2013). Practitioner compliance with risk/needs assessment tools: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 716-736. doi:10.1177/0093854812468883 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    • 22. Ministry of Justice. (2013a). Transforming rehabilitation: A strategy for reform. London: Author.
    • 23. Ministry of Justice. (2013b). Transforming model, rehabilitation programme. London: Author.
    • 24. Mulford, C. F., Wilson, R. E., & Parmley, A. M. (2009). Geographic aspects of sex offender residency restrictions: Policy and research. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 3-12. doi:10.1177/0887403408327683 [CrossRef]
    • 25. Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2012). Spatial optimization and geographic uncertainty: Implications for sex offender management strategies. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 167, 121-142. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0806- 2_5 [CrossRef]
    • 26. Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329-350. doi:10.1080/01639620600605606 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
    • 27. Peck, M. (2011). Patterns of reconviction among offenders eligible for Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). Ministry of Justice Research Series 6/1. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multi-agency-public-protectionarrangements-mappa-patterns-of-reconviction
    • 28. Peet, R. (1975). The geography of crime: A political critique. The Professional Geographer, 27, 277-280. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1975.00277.x [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
    • 29. Socia, K. M. (2013). Too close for comfort? Registered sex offender spatial clustering and recidivistic sex crime arrest rates.Sex Abuse, 25, 531-556. doi:10.1177/1079063212469061 [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
    • 30. Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2013). Law-enforcement officials' views of sex offender registration and community notification. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(2), 95-113. doi:10.1350/ijps.2013.15.2.305 [CrossRef]
    • 31. Travis, A. (2013,November 20). Ministers reject G4S offer to repay £24m after it admits tagging fiasco. The Guardian. UK News, p. 10
    • 32. Vess, J., Day, A., Powell, M., & Graffam, J. (2013). International sex offender registration laws: Research and evaluation issues based on a review of current scientific literature. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 14, 205-218. doi:10.1080/15614263.2012.680719 [Taylor & Francis Online]
    • 33. Wilson, R. J., & Yates, P. M. (2009). Effective interventions and the good lives model: Maximizing treatment gains for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 157-161. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.007 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    • 34. Wood, J., Kemshall, K., Maguire, M., Hudson, K., & Mackenzie, G. (2007). The operation and experience of Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA): Research and statistics department, online report 12/07. London: Home Office.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article