LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Binder, Mario J.; Edwards, John S.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Purpose – Qualitative theory building approaches, such as grounded theory method (GTM), are still not very widespread and rigorously applied in operations management (OM) research. Yet it is agreed that more systematic observation of current industrial phenomena is necessary to help managers deal with their problems. The purpose of this paper is to provide an example to help guide other researchers on using GTM for theory building in OM research. Design/methodology/approach – A GTM study in the German automotive industry consisting of 31 interviews is followed by a validation stage comprising a survey (110 responses) and a focus group. Findings – The result is an example of conducting GTM research in OM, illustrated by the development of the novel collaborative enterprise governance framework for inter-firm relationship governance in the German automotive industry. Research limitations/implications – GTM is appropriate for qualitative theory building research, but the resultant theories need further testing. Research is necessary to identify the transferability of the collaborative enterprise governance concept to other industries than automotive, to other organisational areas than R&D and to product and service settings that are less complex and innovative. Practical implications – The paper helps researchers make more informed use of GTM when engaging in qualitative theory building research in OM. Originality/value – There is a lack of explicit and well-informed use of GTM in OM research because of poor understanding. This paper addresses this deficiency. The collaborative enterprise governance framework is a significant contribution in an area of growing importance within OM.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Auerbach, C.F. and Silverstein, L.B. (2003), Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York University Press, New York.
    • Bauer, M.W. (2000), “Classical content analysis: a review”, in Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook, 3rd ed., Sage, London, pp. 131-151.
    • Barnes, D. (2001), “Research methods for the empirical investigation of the process of formation of operations strategy”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1076-1096.
    • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. (1987), “The case research strategy in studies of information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 369-386.
    • Binder, M. and Clegg, B.T. (2007), “Designing and managing collaborative enterprises in the automotive industry”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 135-152.
    • Binder, M., Gust, P. and Clegg, B.T. (2008), “The importance of collaborative frontloading in automotive supply networks”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 315-331.
    • Bititci, U.S., Martinez, V., Albores, P. and Mendibil, K. (2003), “Creating and sustaining competitive advantage in collaborative systems: the what and the how”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 410-424.
    • Bryant, A. (2002). "Re-grounding grounded theory," JITTA, the Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 25-42.
    • Burgess, K., Singh, P.J. and Koroglu, R. (2006), “Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 703-729.
    • Chen, I.J. and Paulraj, A. (2004), “Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 131-163.
    • Craighead, C.W. and Meredith, J. (2008), “Operations management research: evolution and alternative future paths”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 710-726.
    • Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D.M. and Pagh, J.D. (1997), “Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-13.
    • Coughlan, P. and Coghlan, D. (2002), “Action research for operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 220- 240.
    • Cousins, P.D. (2002), “A conceptual model for managing long-term inter-organisational relationships”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 71-82.
    • Cousins, P.D., Lawson, B. and Squire, B. (2006), “Supply chain management: theory and practice - the emergence of an academic discipline?”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 697-702.
    • Delanty, G. and Strydom, P. (2003), Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
    • De Toni and Tonchia (2003), “Strategic planning and firms‟ competencies: traditional approaches and new perspectives”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 947-976.
    • Dyer, J.H. and Nobeoka, K. (2000), “Creating and managing a high-performance knowledgesharing network: the Toyota case”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 345-367.
    • Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532-550.
    • Ellram, L.M. (1996), “The use of the case study method in logistics research”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 93-138.
    • Field, J. M., and Sroufe, R. P. (2003). The use of recycled materials in manufacturing: implications for supply chain management and operations strategy. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 45, No. 18-19, pp. 4439-4463.
    • Filippini, R. (1997), “Operations management research: some reflection on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 655-670.
    • Fleury, A. and Fleury, M.T. (2007). "The evolution of production systems and conceptual frameworks," Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 8, pp. 949-965.
    • Flint, D.J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., and Mentzer, J.T. (2005). "Logistics innovation: a customer value-oriented social process," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 113.
    • Flint, D.J. and Mentzer, J.T. (2000). "Logiticians as marketers: Their role when customers' desired value changes," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 19.
    • Ford, M.W., Evans, J.R., and Matthews, C.H. (2004). "Linking self-assessment to the external environment: An exploratory study," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24, No. 11/12, pp. 1175-1187.
    • Giunipero, L., Handfield, R.B., and Eltantawy, R. (2006). "Supply management's evolution: key skill sets for the supply manager of the future," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 822-844.
    • Glaser, B.G. (1994), “The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis”, in Glaser, B.G. (Ed.), More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, pp. 182-196.
    • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, New York.
    • Goffin, K., Lemke, F. and Szwejczewski, M. (2006), “An exploratory study of „close‟ supplier-manufacturer relationships”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 189-209.
    • Gulati, R. (1998), “Alliances and networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 293-317.
    • Handfield, R.B. and Melnyk, S.A. (1998), “The scientific theory-building process: a primer using the case of TQM”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 321-339.
    • Hausman, A. and Haytko, D.L. (2003). "Cross-border supply chain relationships: Interpretive research of maquiladora realized strategies," The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 6/7, pp. 545.
    • Hayes, R.H. (2000), “Toward a „new architecture‟ for POM”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 105-110.
    • Jick, T.D. (1979), “Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 602-611.
    • Johnsen, T., Wynstra, F., Zheng, J., Harland, C. and Lamming, R. (2000), “Networking activities in supply networks”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 161-181.
    • Johnston, R., Brignall, S., and Fitzgerald, L. (2002), “The involvement of management accountants in operational process change: Results from field research”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp. 1325-1338.
    • King, N. (1998), “Template analysis”, in Symon, G. and Cassell, C. (Eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide, Sage, London, pp. 118-134.
    • Kiridena, S., Hasan, M. and Kerr, R. (2009), “Exploring deeper structures in manufacturing strategy formation processes: a qualitative inquiry”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 386-417.
    • Kumar, N., Stern, L.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1993), “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 1633-1651.
    • Lee, S. M., Lee, Z., and Lee, J. (2007), “Knowledge transfer in work practice: adoption and use of integrated information systems”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 501-518.
    • Leonard, D. and McAdam, R. (2001). "Grounded theory methodology and practitioner reflexivity in TQM research," International Journal of Quality & Reliability, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 180-194.
    • Lewis, I. and Suchan, J. (2003). "Structuration theory: Its potential impact on logistics research," International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 296-315.
    • Manuj, I. and Mentzer, J.T. (2008). "Global supply chain risk management strategies," International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 192-223.
    • McAdam R, Leonard D, Henderson J and Hazlett S-A (2008), “A grounded theory research approach to building and testing TQM theory in operations management”, OmegaInternational Journal of Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 825-.
    • Mello, J.E., Stank, T.P., and Esper, T.L. (2008). "A Model of Logistics Outsourcing Strategy," Transportation Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 5-25.
    • Narasimhan, R. and Nair, A. (2005), “The antecedent role of quality, information sharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 301-313.
    • Noori, H. and Lee, W.B. (2004), “Collaborative design in a networked enterprise: the case of the telecommunication industry”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42, No. 15, pp. 3041-3054.
    • Olsen, R.F. and Ellram, L.M. (1997a), “Buyer-supplier relationships: alternative research approaches”, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 221-231.
    • Olsen, R.F. and Ellram, L.M. (1997b), “A portfolio approach to supplier relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 101-113.
    • Pilkington, A. and Fitzgerald, R. (2006), “Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 1255-1275.
    • Slack, N., Lewis, M. and Bates, H. (2004), “The two worlds of operations management research and practice - can they meet, should they meet?”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 372-387.
    • Soliman, F., Clegg, S., and Tantoush, T. (2001). "Critical success factors for integration of CAD/CAM systems with ERP systems," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 5/6, pp. 609.
    • Stefansson, G. and Russell, D.M. (2008). "Supply chain interfaces: defining attributes and attribute values for collaborative logistics management," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 347.
    • Vastag, G. and Montabon, F. (2002), “Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management”, OMEGA - The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 109-126.
    • Vonderembse, M.A., Uppal, M., Huang, S.H. and Dismukes, J.P. (2006), “Designing supply chains: towards theory development”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 223-238.
    • Voss, C.A., Tsikriktsis, N. and Fohlich, M. (2002), “Case research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 195-219.
    • Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied social research methods series. Vol. 5, 3rd ed., Sage, Beverly Hills.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article