Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kádár, Daniel Z.; Sun, Hao (2007)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: GT, P1
Due to recent developments in critical discourse analysis (CDA) and forensic linguistics (FL), the theories regarding\ud utilisation of language in police interviews and courtroom interactions have been refined, cf. Cotterill (2003), Gibbons\ud (2003), and Thornborrow (2002). Researchers argue that even in the considerably authoritative police questioning\ud process and courtroom settings, language is a means that not only serves the maintenance but also the redistribution\ud (Bourdieu 1991) of power, i.e., possible resistance against authority. It is a generally accepted view that (im)politeness\ud is one of the most important tools in struggles for power in courtroom trials, cf. Lakoff (1989), or Kurzon (2001).\ud The aim of this study is to apply CDA and FL theories to the linguistics examination of traditional Chinese criminal\ud investigation(s) (TCCI), i.e., the process of interrogating suspects in imperial China in the period spanning the period\ud 238 Panels & panel contributions\ud from the Ming dynasty (13681644) through the Qing dynasty (16441911).[1] In the course of analysing TCCI,\ud particular attention is devoted to the study of traditional Chinese (im)polite formulae and their role in criminal\ud investigations. TCCI and its institutional (im)politeness are of relevance to both CDA and FL, since their examination\ud can show how language and (im)politeness are utilized in attaining discourse goals in historical Chinese legal settings,\ud which differ enormously from the well-studied modern Western ones. Besides, TCCI is a hitherto regrettably\ud understudied topic. Notwithstanding the pivotal place occupied by traditional Chinese law amongst the legal traditions\ud of the world (Katz ed. 1986), traditional Chinese courtroom language has not been studied in any detail by historical\ud pragmaticians or forensic linguists. Furthermore, while traditional Chinese law has an extensive sinological literature,\ud such works only touch upon, if discuss at all, its language.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article