LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chanialidis, Charalampos; Evers, Ludger; Neocleous, Tereza; Nobile, Agostino (2014)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Statistics::Computation
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/sta4.61
The normalization constant in the distribution of a discrete random variable may not be available in closed form; in such cases, the calculation of the likelihood can be computationally expensive. Approximations of the likelihood or approximate Bayesian computation methods can be used; but the resulting Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm may not sample from the target of interest. In certain situations, one can efficiently compute lower and upper bounds on the likelihood. As a result, the target density and the acceptance probability of the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm can be bounded. We propose an efficient and exact MCMC algorithm based on the idea of retrospective sampling. This procedure can be applied to a number of discrete distributions, one of which is the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution. In practice, the bounds on the acceptance probability do not need to be particularly tight in order to accept or reject a move. We demonstrate this method using data on the emergency hospital admissions in Scotland in 2010, where the main interest lies in the estimation of the variability of admissions, as it is considered as a proxy for health inequalities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Besag, J, York, J & Mollié, A (1991), 'Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics,' Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43(1), pp. 1-20, doi:10.1007/BF00116466.
    • Beskos, A, Papaspiliopoulos, O, Roberts, GO & Fearnhead, P (2006), 'Exact and computationally efficient likelihood-based estimation for discretely observed diffusion processes (with discussion),' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68(3), pp. 333-382, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00552.x.
    • Bivand, R (2014), spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models, r package version 0.5-71.
    • Bivand, R & Lewin-Koh, N (2013), maptools: Tools for reading and handling spatial objects, r package version 0.8-27.
    • Conway, RW & Maxwell, WL (1962), 'A queuing model with state dependent service rate,' Journal of Industrial Engineering, 12, pp. 132-136.
    • Del Castillo, J & Pérez-Casany, M (1998), 'Weighted poisson distributions for overdispersion and underdispersion situations,' Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 50(3), pp. 567-585, doi:10.1023/A: 1003585714207.
    • Eddelbuettel, D & François, R (2011), 'Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ integration,' Journal of Statistical Software, 40(8), pp. 1-18.
    • Gelman, A & Rubin, DB (1992), 'Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences.' Statistical Science, 7(4), pp. 457-472.
    • Guikema, SD & Coffelt, JP (2008), 'A flexible count data regression model for risk analysis.' Risk analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 28, pp. 213-223, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01014.x.
    • Lee, D (2011), 'A comparison of conditional autoregressive models used in Bayesian disease mapping.' Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology, 2(2), pp. 79-89.
    • Lee, D (2013), 'CARBayes: An R package for Bayesian spatial modeling with conditional autoregressive priors,' Journal of Statistical Software, 55(13), pp. 1-24.
    • Leroux, B, Lei, X & Breslow, N (2000), 'Estimation of disease rates in small areas: A new mixed model for spatial dependence,' in Halloran, M & Berry, D (eds.), Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials, Springer New York, vol. 116 of The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, pp. 179-191, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_4.
    • Minka, TP, Shmueli, G, Kadane, JB, Borle, S & Boatwright, P (2003), 'Computing with the COM-Poisson distribution,' Tech. rep., CMU Statistics Department.
    • Papaspiliopoulos, O & Roberts, GO (2008), 'Retrospective Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for Dirichlet process hierarchical models,' Biometrika, 95, pp. 169-186, doi:10.1093/biomet/asm086.
    • Plummer, M, Best, N, Cowles, K & Vines, K (2006), 'Coda: Convergence diagnostics and output analysis for mcmc,' R News, 6(1), pp. 7-11.
    • R Core Team (2014), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
    • Scottish Government (2009), 'Scottish index of multiple deprivation,' doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6871-1.
    • Sellers, KF & Shmueli, G (2010), 'A flexible regression model for count data,' Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(2), pp. 943-961, doi:10.1214/09-aoas306.
    • Sermaidis, G, Papaspiliopoulos, O, Roberts, GO, Beskos, A & Fearnhead, P (2013), 'Markov chain Monte Carlo for exact inference for diffusions,' Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 40(2), pp. 294-321, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2012.00812.x.
    • Shmueli, G, Minka, TP, Kadane, JB, Borle, S & Boatwright, P (2005), 'A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the ConwayMaxwell-Poisson distribution,' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 54, pp. 127-142, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876. 2005.00474.x.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    73
    73%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article