Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sathiaseelan, Arjuna; Mortier, Richard; Goulden, Murray; Greiffenhagen, Christian; Radenkovic, Milena; Crowcroft, Jon; McAuley, Derek (2014)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Universal Internet access has become critical to modern life, leading to many explorations of approaches to increase its availability. In this paper we report on a study of one such approach, PAWS, that seeks to understand the technical and social constraints of providing Internet access, free at the point of use, by sharing existing broadband subscribers' connections. We elaborate the technical and social context of our deployment, a deprived neighbourhood in a medium-sized British city, and discuss the constraints on and resulting architecture of this system, including the authentication and security mechanisms necessary for a service of this kind. We then report on the use of our deployment over a period of seven months from July 2013 to February 2014, including analyses of the performance and usage of the network. Our data show that PAWS is socially and technically feasible and has the potential to provide Internet access economically to many who are currently digitally disenfranchised. However, doing so requires overcoming numerous challenges, both technical and social
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Internet world statistics. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
    • [2] Cabinet Office. Digital by Default proposed for government services. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ news/digital-default-proposed-government-services, 2010. Accessed Dec. 10th, 2013.
    • [3] OFCOM. Communications Market Report: UK - Smartphone Data Tables (Adults). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/ market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/, 2011.
    • [4] J.B. Horrigan. What are the consequences of being disconnected in a broadband-connected world? Daedalus, 140(4):17-31, 2011.
    • [5] Broadband Delivery UK, Broadband Delivery Programme: Delivery Model, 2011. UK Gov't Dept. Culture, Media and Sport: London.
    • [6] A. Sathiaseelan and J. Crowcroft. Lcd-net: Lowest cost denominator networking. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 43(2):52-57, April 2013.
    • [7] Fon. http://www.fon.com.
    • [8] A. Sathiaseelan, J. Crowcroft, M. Goulden, C. Greiffenhagen, R. Mortier, G. Fairhurst, and D. McAuley. Public access wifi service (PAWS). In Digital Economy All Hands Meeting, 2012.
    • [9] Y. Rogers. Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory. interactions, 18(4):58-62, July 2011.
    • [10] I. Deutscher. What We Say/What We Do: Sentiments & Acts. Scott, Foresman., Glenview, ILL, December 1973.
    • [11] A. Crabtree, P. Tolmie, and M. Rouncefield. “How Many Bloody Examples Do You Want?” Fieldwork and Generalisation. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), pages 1-20. Springer London, September 21-25 2013.
    • [12] Project BISmark. http://projectbismark.net.
    • [13] M-lab. http://www.measurementlab.net.
    • [14] S. Sundaresan, W. de Donato, N. Feamster, R. Teixeira, S. Crawford, and A. Pescapè. Broadband internet performance: A view from the gateway. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2011, pages 134-145. ACM, 2011.
    • [15] A. Botta, A. Dainotti, and A. Pescapè. A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios. Computer Networks, 56(15):3531-3547, 2012.
    • [16] N. Vallina-Rodriguez, J. Shah, A. Finamore, Y. Grunenberger, K. Papagiannaki, H. Haddadi, and J. Crowcroft. Breaking for commercials: Characterizing mobile advertising. In Proc. ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 343-356. ACM, 2012.
    • [17] C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Netalyzr: Illuminating the edge network. In Proc. ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), Melbourne, Australia, 2010.
    • [18] C. Kreibich, N. Weaver, G. Maier, B. Nechaev, and V. Paxson. Experiences from netalyzr with engaging users in end-system measurement. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Measurements Up the Stack (W-MUST), Toronto, Canada, 2011.
    • [19] E. C. Efstathiou, Pantelis A. Frangoudis, and G. C. Polyzos. Controlled wi-fi sharing in cities: A decentralized approach relying on indirect reciprocity. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., pages 1147-1160, 2010.
    • [20] E.C. Efstathiou and G.C. Polyzos. Trustworthy accounting for wireless LAN sharing communities. In Proc. EuroPKI, pages 260-273, 2004.
    • [21] I. Psaras and L. Mamatas. On demand connectivity sharing: Queuing management and load balancing for user-provided networks. Comput. Netw., 55(2):399-414, February 2011.
    • [22] M. Mandviwalla, A. Jain, J. Fesenmaier, J. Smith, P. Weinberg, and G. Meyers. Municipal broadband wireless networks. Commun. ACM, 51(2):72-80, February 2008.
    • [23] J. Bicket, D. Aguayo, S. Biswas, and R. Morris. Architecture and evaluation of an unplanned 802.11b mesh network. In Pro. International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 31-42. ACM, 2005.
    • [24] J. Camp, J. Robinson, Ch. Steger, and E. Knightly. Measurement driven deployment of a two-tier urban mesh access network. In Proc. International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (MOBISYS), pages 96-109. ACM, 2006.
    • [25] B Raman and K. Chebrolu. Experiences in using WiFi for rural internet in india. Comm. Mag., 45(1):104-110, January 2007.
    • [26] G. Bernardi, P. Buneman, and M.K. Marina. Tegola tiered mesh network testbed in rural Scotland. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Wireless Networks and Systems for Developing Regions (WINS-DR), pages 9-16. ACM, 2008.
    • [27] J. Ishmael, S. Bury, D. Pezaros, and N. Race. Deploying rural community wireless mesh networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(4):22-29, 2008.
    • [28] Bristol wireless. http://www.bristolwireless.net.
    • [29] A. Sathiaseelan, C. Rotsos, C.S. Sriram, D. Trossen, P. Papadimitriou, and J. Crowcroft. Virtual public networks. In 2nd IEEE European Workshop on Software Defined Networking (EWSDN), 2013.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article