Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hanel, Paul (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: BF
This thesis has three aims. First, I propose that researchers should focus more on \ud similarities between groups of people, because they are arguably at least as interesting \ud and important as differences. I demonstrate that even effects that are usually labelled as \ud large often still display more similarities than differences between groups. In Study 1, I \ud modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the \ud importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social \ud variables (e.g., types of human values, trust, moral attitudes) within six commonly used \ud social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious \ud denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between two groups \ud (e.g., high vs. low educated) was greater than 90%. Study 2 (N = 54,082) replicated \ud these findings. Study 3 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about \ud similarity, by showing that a research report led to more accurate perceptions when \ud similarities were presented alongside differences. \ud Secondly, I explored whether differences might emerge in relatively concrete \ud variables. In particular, human values (e.g., freedom, creativity) measured in Studies 1 \ud and 2 were very abstract, and people instantiate (that is to say, exemplify) human values \ud differently. I directly examined these instantiations in Brazil, India, and the UK (Study \ud 4). Although some meaningful differences in value instantiation emerged, within-\ud country variability outweighed between-country differences. Studies 5-7 provided \ud further support for this conclusion. \ud Finally, I tested the implications of one provocative difference in value \ud instantiation, namely a tendency to associate the value of creativity with art and not with \ud science, particularly in the UK and not in Brazil (Study 8). Results indicated that the \ud detection of this difference may depend on the ways in which art and science are \ud iv\ud presented to participants, and this finding has implications for attempts to engage more \ud interest in science.\ud To conclude, the final chapter of the thesis summarises the findings and \ud discusses some limitations across the chapters. It then outlines a range of broad \ud implications, including the benefits of a stronger focus on similarities, such as increased \ud transparency in the reporting of scientific results.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Hanel, P. H. P., Zacharopoulos, G., Mégardon, G., & Maio, G. R. (2016). Detecting sinusoidal patterns from circumplex models of psychological constructs. Manuscript in Preparation.
    • Harding, S., & Phillips, D. (1986). Contrasting values in Western Europe: Unity, diversity and change. London: Macmillan.
    • Harrison, T. (Ed.). (2002). Greeks and Barbarians. New York: Routledge.
    • Haslam, N., Whelan, J., & Bastian, B. (2009). Big Five traits mediate associations between values and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 40-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.001
    • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    • Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., … Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767- 1770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333
    • Herskovits, M. J. (1948). Man and his work: The science of cultural anthropology. New York, NY: Knopf.
    • Hirschfeld, G., & von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-Group confirmatory factor analysis in R - A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(7), 1-12.
    • Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 359-393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110640
    • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills , CA: SAGE Publications.
    • Jen, M. H., Sund, E. R., Johnston, R., & Jones, K. (2010). Trustful societies, trustful individuals, and health: An analysis of self-rated health and social trust using the World Value Survey. Health & Place, 16(5), 1022-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.008
    • Jia, Y. A., Rowlinson, S., Kvan, T., Lingard, H. C., & Yip, B. (2009). Burnout among Hong Kong Chinese architecture students: the paradoxical effect of Confucian conformity values. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902736296
    • Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898
    • Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8(4), 311-366. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0804_1
    • Kasser, T., Koestner, R., & Lekes, N. (2002). Early family experiences and adult values: A 26-year, prospective longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 826-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289011
    • Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
    • Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600909091 approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 658-673. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.658
    • Lord, C. G., Desforges, D. M., Ramsey, S. L., Trezza, G. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1991). Typicality effects in attitude-behavior consistency: Effects of category discrimination and category knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 550-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90025-2
    • Lord, C. G., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Attitude representation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 265-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260108602750
    • Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Mackie, D. (1984). Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1254
    • Lundberg, G. A. (1950). Human values - a research program. Research Studies of the State College of Washington, 18, 103-111.
    • Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42 (Vol. 42, pp. 1-43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    • Maio, G. R. (2016). The psychology of human values. London: Psychology Press.
    • Maio, G. R., Hahn, U., Frost, J.-M., & Cheung, W.-Y. (2009). Applying the value of equality unequally: Effects of value instantiations that vary in typicality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 598-614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016683
    • Mayton, D. M., & Furnham, A. (1994). Value underpinnings of antinuclear political activism: A cross-national study. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01200.x
    • Mbigi, L. (1997). Ubuntu: The African dream in management. Randburg: Knowledge Resources.
    • McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6(4), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197480
    • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273-294). London: Sage.
    • McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
    • McNarry, L. R., & O'Farrell, S. (1971). Students reveal negative attitudes toward technology. Science, 172(3987), 1060-1061. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3987.1060
    • Mead, M., & Métraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science, 126(3270), 384-390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384
    • Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 113-138.
    • Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq059
    • Nisbett, R. E. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently...and why. New York, NY: Free Press.
    • Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
    • Nussbaum, M. (2004). Emotions as judgements of value and importance. In R. C. Solomon (Ed.), Thinking about feeling: Contemporary philosophers on emotions (pp. 183-199). New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yJVMspT27EC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Thinking+about+feeling:+Contemporary +philosophers+on+emotions%22&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjpcHwlInNAhUjK8AKHT-SBqQQ6AEIHzAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
    • Office for National Statistics. (2014). Chapter 2 - Homicide. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_352260.pdf
    • Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 980-990. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511006
    • Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
    • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
    • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of
    • Perneger, T. V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ, 316(7139), 1236-1238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236
    • Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second‐Order Meta‐analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 450-461.
    • Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035-1041.
    • Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package version 0.4-11). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/index.html
    • Pozzebon, J. A., & Ashton, M. C. (2009). Personality and values as predictors of selfand peer-reported behavior. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(3), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.3.122
    • Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.112.1.160
    • Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRaMuTeQ: Interface de R pour les analyses multidimensionnelles de textes et de questionnaires [IRaMuTeQ: R interface for multidimensional analysis of texts and questionnaires]. Retrieved from http://www.iramuteq.org/
    • Rawlins, B. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 1-21.
    • Ribeiro, R. L., Pompéia, S., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2005). Comparison of Brazilian and American norms for the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 27(3), 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516- 44462005000300009
    • Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Scott, R. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.491
    • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.86.3.638
    • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
    • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
    • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Ruscio, J. (2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19
    • Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution and behavior: A life history perspective. Port Huron: Charles Darin Research Institute.
    • Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 102-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102
    • Ruxton, G. D. (2006). The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17(4), 688- 690. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark016 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
    • Schoot, R. van de, Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
    • Schroeder, M. (2012). Value theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/value-theory/
    • Schultz, P., & Zelezny, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior: A fivecountry survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540-558. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022198294003
    • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
    • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357
    • Schwartz, S. H. (2008). The 7 Schwartz cultural value orientation scores for 80 countries. Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304715744_The_7_Schwartz_cultural_ value_orientation_scores_for_80_countries
    • Schwartz, S. H. (2014a). Functional theories of human values: Comment on Gouveia, Milfont, and Guerra (2014). Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 247- 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.024
    • Schwartz, S. H., & Tessler, R. C. (1972). A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033365
    • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515-530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
    • Seligman, C., & Katz, A. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 53-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Sharma, A., Gur, R., & Bhalla, P. (2012). Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: updating income ranges for the year 2012. Indian Journal of Public Health, 56(1). Retrieved from http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/20489237/1194520481/name/IndianJPublicHealth 561103-2787554_074435.pdf
    • Sharpe, D. (2013). Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 572-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034177
    • Shultziner, D. (2003). Human dignity - functions and meanings. Global Jurist Topics, 3(3). Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Doron_Shultziner/publication/241002874_Human _Dignity_Functions_and_Meanings/links/00b7d522ad17e53070000000.pdf
    • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article