Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hanel, Paul (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: BF
This thesis has three aims. First, I propose that researchers should focus more on \ud similarities between groups of people, because they are arguably at least as interesting \ud and important as differences. I demonstrate that even effects that are usually labelled as \ud large often still display more similarities than differences between groups. In Study 1, I \ud modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the \ud importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social \ud variables (e.g., types of human values, trust, moral attitudes) within six commonly used \ud social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious \ud denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between two groups \ud (e.g., high vs. low educated) was greater than 90%. Study 2 (N = 54,082) replicated \ud these findings. Study 3 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about \ud similarity, by showing that a research report led to more accurate perceptions when \ud similarities were presented alongside differences. \ud Secondly, I explored whether differences might emerge in relatively concrete \ud variables. In particular, human values (e.g., freedom, creativity) measured in Studies 1 \ud and 2 were very abstract, and people instantiate (that is to say, exemplify) human values \ud differently. I directly examined these instantiations in Brazil, India, and the UK (Study \ud 4). Although some meaningful differences in value instantiation emerged, within-\ud country variability outweighed between-country differences. Studies 5-7 provided \ud further support for this conclusion. \ud Finally, I tested the implications of one provocative difference in value \ud instantiation, namely a tendency to associate the value of creativity with art and not with \ud science, particularly in the UK and not in Brazil (Study 8). Results indicated that the \ud detection of this difference may depend on the ways in which art and science are \ud iv\ud presented to participants, and this finding has implications for attempts to engage more \ud interest in science.\ud To conclude, the final chapter of the thesis summarises the findings and \ud discusses some limitations across the chapters. It then outlines a range of broad \ud implications, including the benefits of a stronger focus on similarities, such as increased \ud transparency in the reporting of scientific results.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article