Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
McCoy, EA; Christian, JM; McDonald, GS; Sanchez-Curto, J; Chamorro-Posada, P
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: media_dig_tech_and_creative_econ, other, energy

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Optics
Perhaps the most fundamental electromagnetic phenomenon is the behaviour of light at the interface between dissimilar materials. In fact, the entire field of Optics follows from this single key concept. The reflection and refraction properties of a plane wave incident on the uniform boundary between two linear dielectric materials is an elementary configuration covered in standard textbooks on electromagnetism (see, e.g. Ref. [1]). In contrast,\ud the behaviour of a beam with a finite transverse cross-section is much more complicated affair, and one must\ud often resort to wholly-numerical calculations. Relatively little is known about light-interface interactions when\ud nonlinear components are thrown into the mix – for instance, where the refractive index (of one or both\ud materials) depends in some way on incident light intensity.\ud \ud The problem of fully-nonlinear interfaces was first attacked in a pair of seminal papers some two decades ago by\ud Aceves and coworkers [2,3]. Their classic approach considered scalar spatial optical solitons (self-collimated,\ud self-stabilizing light beams with a stationary intensity profile) incident on the boundary between two dissimilar\ud Kerr-type media (i.e., materials whose refractive index varies proportionally with local light intensity I). While\ud highly instructive, these early analyses were based upon a governing equation whose central tenet was that angles of incidence, reflection and refraction (with respect to the interface) must be negligibly small.\ud \ud In practice, the “small angles” approximation is not entirely satisfactory. In the laboratory, one generally has\ud complete freedom to choose any incidence angle; ideally, one would like any theoretical model to possess the same angular freedom. To this end, we have recently developed a theoretical framework that allows us to predict, for the first time, the refraction of soliton beams incident at any angle on a Kerr-type interface [4,5]. Our latest efforts have been to extend these preliminary analyses to much wider classes of power-law materials [6], whose refractive index varies with light intensity according to Ip (where 0 < p < 2 – the Kerr nonlinearity thus corresponds to the particular case of p = 1). By a curious twist of fate, it turns out that the full nonlinear beams configuration can be described by a simple generalization of the trivially-familiar Snell’s law for plane waves.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics 3rd Ed., 1999 John Wiley & Sons (New York). A. B. Aceves, J. V. Moloney, and A. C. Newell, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1809 (1989). A. B. Aceves, J. V. Moloney, and A. C. Newell, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1828 (1989). J. Sánchez-Curto, P. Chamorro-Posada, and G. S. McDonald, Opt. Lett. 35, 1347 (2010). J. Sánchez-Curto, P. Chamorro-Posada, and G. S. McDonald, Opt. Lett. 32, 1126 (2007). J. M. Christian, G.S. McDonald, R. J. Potton, and P. Chamorro-Posada, Phys. Rev. A 76, 033834 (2007).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article