Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Binks, Claire; Fenton, Mark; McCarthy, Lucy; Lee, Tracey; Adams, Clive E.; Duggan, Conor (2006)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, H1
Background\ud Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a relatively common personality disorder with a major impact on health services as those\ud affected often present in crisis, often self-harming.\ud Objectives\ud To evaluate the effects of psychological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.\ud Search strategy\ud We conducted a systematic search of 26 specialist and general bibliographic databases (December 2002) and searched relevant reference\ud lists for further trials.\ud Selection criteria\ud All relevant clinical randomised controlled trials involving psychological treatments for peoplewith BPD.The definition of psychological\ud treatments included behavioural, cognitive-behavioural, psychodynamic and psychoanalytic.\ud Data collection and analysis\ud We independently selected, quality assessed and data extracted studies. For binary outcomes we calculated a standard estimation of\ud the risk ratio (RR), its 95% confidence interval (CI), and where possible the number need to help/harm (NNT/H). For continuous\ud outcomes, endpoint data were preferred to change data. Non-skewed data from valid scales were summated using a weighted mean\ud difference (WMD).\ud Main results\ud We identified seven studies involving 262 people, and five separate comparisons. Comparing dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) with\ud treatment as usual studies found no difference for the outcome of still meeting SCID-II criteria for the diagnosis of BPD by six months\ud (n=28, 1 RCT, RR 0.69 CI 0.35 to 1.38) or admission to hospital in previous three months (n=28, 1 RCT, RR 0.77 CI 0.28 to 2.14).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1.8 Cochrane Schizophrenia Groups Register of trials related to
    • Forensic Mental Health Services (2000): we searched this using
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok