Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hughes, Will (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
The role of the academic in the built environment seems generally to be not well understood or articulated. While this problem is not unique to our field, there are plenty of examples in a wide range of academic disciplines where the academic role has been fully articulated. But built environment academics have tended not to look beyond their own literature and their own vocational context in trying to give meaning to their academic work. The purpose of this keynote presentation is to explore the context of academic work generally and the connections between education, research and practice in the built environment, specifically. By drawing on ideas from the sociology of the professions, the role of universities, and the fundamentals of social science research, a case is made that helps to explain the kind of problems that routinely obstruct academic progress in our field. This discussion reveals that while there are likely to be great weaknesses in much of what is published and taught in the built environment, it is not too great a stretch to provide a more robust understanding and a good basis for developing our field in a way that would enable us collectively to make a major contribution to theory-building, theory-testing and to make a good stab at tackling some of the problems facing society at large. There is no reason to disregard the fundamental academic disciplines that underpin our knowledge of the built environment. If we contextualise our work in these more fundamental disciplines, there is every reason to think that we can have a much greater impact that we have experienced to date.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Converse, J.M. and Presser, S. (1986) Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No 63. London: Sage.
    • Fink, A. (Ed.) (1995) The survey kit. Sage, London.
    • Foddy, W. (1994) Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    • Hughes, W.P. (2003) Technological scenario: de-professionalized, automated construction procurement. In: Foxell, Simon (ed.) The professionals' choice: the future of the built environment professions. London: Building Futures (a joint initiative of RIBA and CABE), 82-98.
    • Kanter, R.M. (1983) The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    • Moser, C. and Kalton, G. (2001) Survey methods in social investigation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • O'Neill, O. (2002) A question of trust: the BBC Reith lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    • Oppenheim, A.N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers.
    • Patterson, G. (1997) The university from ancient Greece to the 20th century. Palmerston North, New Zealand: The Dunmore Press.
    • Shils, E. (1997) The Calling of Education: 'Academic Ethic' and Other Essays on Higher Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article