LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
James, Deborah M.; Pilnick, Alison; Hall, Alex; Collins, Luke C. (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Health(social science), L500, B900
In our study of a workforce intervention within a health and social care context we found that participants who took part in longitudinal research interviews were commonly enacting scenes from their work during one-to one interviews. Scenes were defined as portions of the interviews in which participants directly quoted the speech of at least two actors. Our analysis in this paper focuses on these enacted scenes, and compares the content of them before and after the intervention. We found that, whilst the tensions between consistency and change, and change management, were common topics for scene enactment in both pre- and post-intervention data, following the intervention participants were much more likely to present themselves as active agents in that change. Post intervention enacted scenes also showed participants’ reports of taking a service user perspective, and a focus on their interactions with service users that had been absent from pre-intervention data. In addition, descriptions of positive feeling and emotions were present in the post-intervention enacted scenes. We suggest that this analysis confirms the importance of enacted scenes as an analytic resource, and that this importance goes beyond their utility in identifying the impact of this specific intervention. Given the congruence between the themes prominent in enacted scenes, and those which emerged from a more extensive qualitative analysis of these data, we argue that enacted scenes may also be of wider methodological importance. The possibility of using scene enactment as an approach to the validation of inductive analysis in health and social care settings could provide a useful methodological resource in settings where longitudinal ethnographic observation of frontline care staff is impossible or impractical.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aijmer, K., Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., 2004. A model and methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: the semantic field of expectation. J. Pragmat. 36, 1781e1805.
    • Aikhenvald, A.Y., Dixon, R.W.M. (Eds.), 2003. Studies in Evidentiality. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
    • Alvarez-Caccamo, C., 1996. The power of reflexive language(s): code displacement in direct speech. J. Pragmat. 25, 33e59.
    • Anderson, D.L., 2005. “What you'll say is?” Represented voice in organizational change discourse. J. Organ. Change Manag. 18 (1), 63e77.
    • Baynham, M., 1996. Direct speech: what's it doing in non-narrative discourse? J. Pragmat. 25, 61e81.
    • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.
    • Buttny, R., 1998. Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact 31, 45e58.
    • Chafe, W., Nichols, J., 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
    • Clark, H.H., Gerrig, R.J.,1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66 (4), 764e805.
    • Clift, R., 2006. Indexing stance: direct speech as an interactional evidential. J. Sociolinguistics 10 (5), 569e595.
    • Cornillie, B., 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Funct. Lang. 16 (1), 44e62.
    • Department of Health, 2001. Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. Department of Health, London.
    • Department of Health, 2009. Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. Department of Health, London.
    • Department of Health, 2010. Fulfilling and Rewarding Lives: The Strategy for Adults with Autism in England. Department of Health, London.
    • Department of Health, 2012. Caring for Our Future: Reforming Care and Support. Department of Health, London.
    • Downing, A., 2001. 'Surely you knew!' Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Funct. Lang. 8 (2), 253e285.
    • Du Bois, J.W., 2004. Searching for intersubjectivity: too and either in stance alignment. In: Paper Presented to the 25th Conference of International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English, Verona, 19e23 May.
    • Fox, B.A., 2001. Evidentiality: authority, responsibility, and entitlement in english conversation. J. Linguistic Anthropol. 11 (2), 167e192.
    • Glaser, B., Strauss, A., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine Publishing Company, Hawthorne, NY.
    • Goodwin, C., 1994. Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96 (3), 606e633.
    • Heritage, J., 2012. Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45 (1), 1e29.
    • Heritage, J., Raymond, G., 2005. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Soc. Psychol. Q. 68, 15e38.
    • Holt, E., 1996. Reporting on talk: the use of direct direct speech in conversation. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 29, 219e245.
    • Holt, E., 2000. Reporting and reacting: concurrent responses to direct speech. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 33 (4), 425e454.
    • James, D., Hall, A., Lombardo, C., McGovern, W., 2016. A video feedback intervention for workforce development: exploring staff perspective using longitudinal qualitative methodology. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. in press.
    • James, D., Hall, A., Phillipson, J., McCrossan, G., Falck, C., 2013. Creating a personcentred culture within the North East Autism Society: preliminary findings. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 41 (4), 269e303.
    • Ka€rkka€inen, E., 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
    • Kennedy, H., Landor, M., Todd, L. (Eds.), 2011. Video Interaction Guidance: A Relationship-based Intervention to Promote Attunement, Empathy and Wellbeing. Jessica Kingsley, London.
    • Kennedy, I., 2010. Getting it right for children and young people: overcoming cultural barriers in the NHS so as to meet their needs. Crown Copyright, September 10, produced by COI, L018821 p.
    • Kochman, T., 1981. Black and White Styles in Conflict. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
    • Li, C., 1986. Direct and indirect speech: a functional study. In: Coulmas, C. (Ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech. Mouton de Gruyer, Berlin, pp. 29e45.
    • Macintyre, S., Oldman, D., 1977. Coping with migraine. In: Davis, A., Horobin, G. (Eds.), Medical Encounters. Croom Helm, London, pp. 55e71.
    • Myers, G., 1999. Functions of reported speech in group discussions. Appl. Linguist 20 (3), 376e401.
    • Nicolini, D., 2011. Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22 (3), 602e620.
    • Pilnick, A., James, D., 2013. “I'm thrilled that you see that”: seeing success in interactions with children with deafness and autistic spectrum disorder. Soc. Sci. & Med. 99, 89e101.
    • Stevanovic, M., Per€akyl€a, A., 2012. Deontic authority in interaction: the right to announce, propose and decide. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45 (3), 297e321.
    • Tannen, D., 1985. Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In: Olson, D.R., Torrance, N., Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, pp. 124e147.
    • Tannen, D., 1986. Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In: Coulmas, F. (Ed.), Direct and Indirect Speech, Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 31. Mouton de Gruyter, New York, pp. 311e360.
    • Webb, J., et al., 2015. Speaking on behalf of patients in group interactions in an intellectual disability medical care setting. In: Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Conference, Chicago.
    • Wigginton, Britta, Lafrance, Michelle N., 2014. 'I think he is immune to all the smoke I gave him': how women account for the harm of smoking during pregnancy. Health Risk Soc 16 (6), 530e546.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.