LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bondar, Alex; Dolgov, Alexander; Poluektov, Anton; Vorobiev, Vitaly (2013)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: The European Physical Journal C
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QC, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, Engineering (miscellaneous), High Energy Physics - Experiment, Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
A possible effect of direct CP violation in D -> K-S(0)pi(+)pi(-) decay on the gamma measurement from B-+/- -> DK +/-, D -> K-S(0)pi(+)pi(-) Dalitz plot analysis is considered. Systematic uncertainty of gamma coming from the current limits on direct CP violation in D -> K-S(0)pi(+)pi(-) is estimated, and a modified model-independent procedure of B-+/- -> DK +/-, D -> K-S(0)pi(+)pi(-) Dalitz plot analysis is proposed that gives an unbiased gamma measurement even in presence of direct CP violation in charm decays. The technique is applicable to other threebody D decays such as D-0 -> (KSK+K-)-K-0, D-0 -> pi(+)pi(-)pi(0), etc.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963)
    • 2. M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973)
    • 3. J. Zupan, The case for measuring γ precisely. arXiv:1101.0134 [hep-ph] (2011)
    • 4. M. Gronau, D. London, Phys. Lett. B 253, 483 (1991)
    • 5. M. Gronau, D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 265, 172 (1991)
    • 6. D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3257 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9612433
    • 7. A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054018 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0303187
    • 8. A. Bondar, in Proceedings of BINP Special Analysis Meeting on Dalitz Analysis, Sept. 24-26, 2002 (unpublished)
    • 9. J.P. Silva, A. Soffer, Phys. Rev. D 61, 112001 (2000). arXiv: hep-ph/9912242
    • 10. Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 72, 031501 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0505270
    • 11. A. Bondar, A. Poluektov, V. Vorobiev, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034033 (2010). arXiv:1004.2350 [hep-ph]
    • 12. R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 111602 (2012). arXiv:1112.0938 [hep-ex]
    • 13. W. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 061802 (2013). arXiv:1211.4539 [hep-ph]
    • 14. M. Martone, J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034005 (2013). arXiv: 1212.0165 [hep-ph]
    • 15. B. Bhattacharya, D. London, M. Gronau, J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074002 (2013). arXiv:1301.5631 [hep-ph]
    • 16. R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb Collaboration), arXiv:1303.2614 [hep-ex]. (2013)
    • 17. R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb Collaboration), A search for timeintegrated CP violation in D0 → K−K+ and D0 → π −π + decays. LHCbCONF-2013-003 (2013)
    • 18. J. Libby, et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 112006 (2010). arXiv:1010.2817 [hep-ex]
    • 19. H. Aihara, et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 85, 112014 (2012). arXiv:1204.6561 [hep-ex]
    • 20. R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 718, 43 (2012). arXiv:1209.5869 [hep-ex]
    • 21. A. Bondar, A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C 55, 51 (2008). arXiv: 0801.0840 [hep-ex]
    • 22. A. Bondar, T. Gershon, P. Krokovny, Phys. Lett. B 624, 1 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0503174
    • 23. P. Krokovny et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 081801 (2006). arXiv:hep-ex/0605023
    • 24. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 231802 (2007). arXiv:0708.1544 [hep-ex]
    • 25. T. Latham, T. Gershon, J. Phys. G 36, 025006 (2009). arXiv: 0809.0872 [hep-ph]
    • 26. D. Asner, et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 70, 091101 (2004). arXiv:hep-ex/0311033
    • 27. T. Aaltonen, et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 032007 (2012). arXiv:1207.0825 [hep-ex]
    • 28. A. Poluektov, et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 112002 (2010). arXiv:1003.3360 [hep-ex]
    • 29. J. Charles, et al. (CKM-tter group), Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 1 (2005). Updated results and plots are available at. http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr
    • 30. D. Derkach, et al. (UTfit Collaboration), arXiv:1301.3300 (2013)
    • 31. R. Aaij, et al. (LHCb Collaboration), arXiv:1208.3355 [hep-ex] (2012)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok