Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Elkady, M; Elmarakbi, Ahmed; MacIntyre, John (2012)
Publisher: Sage
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: sub_automotiveengineering
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Seiler P, Song B and Hedrick JK. Development of a collision avoidance system. SAE paper 980853, 1998.
    • 2. Tamura M, Inoue H, Watanabe T and Maruko N. Research on a brake assist system with a preview function. SAE paper 2001-01-0357, 2001.
    • 3. Jansson J, Gustafsson F and Johansson J. Decision making for collision avoidance systems. SAE paper 2002-01- 0403, 2002.
    • 4. Schoeneburg R and Breitling T. Enhancement of active & passive safety by future pre-safe systems. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6-9 June 2005, paper 05-0080-O. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
    • 5. Gietelink O, Ploeg J, De Schutter B and Verhaegen M. Development of advanced driver assistance systems with vehicle hardware-in-the-loop simulations. Veh System Dynamics 2006; 44(7): 569-590.
    • 6. Elmarakbi A and Zu J. Mathematical modelling of a vehicle crash with emphasis on the dynamic response analysis of extendable cubic non-linear dampers using the incremental harmonic balance method. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2007; 221(2): 143-156.
    • 7. Elmarakbi A and Zu J. Dynamic analysis of smart structures for vehicle-to vehicle frontal collision alleviation. Trans Soc Automot Engrs Japan 2004; 35: 151-156.
    • 8. Elmarakbi A. Mathematical methodology: incremental harmonic balance method and its application in automotive crashes. SAE paper 2007-01-2140, 2007.
    • 9. Elmarakbi A and Zu J. Incremental harmonic balance method for analysis of standard/smart vehicles-to-rigid barrier frontal collision. Int J Veh Safety 2007; 2(3): 288- 315.
    • 10. Chang JM, Rahman M, Ali M, et al. Modeling and design for vehicle pitch and drop of body-on-frame vehicles. SAE paper 2005-01-0356, 2005.
    • 11. Chang JM, Ali M, Craig R, et al. Important modeling practices in CAE simulation for vehicle pitch and drop. SAE paper 2006-01-0124, 2006.
    • 12. Chang JM, Huang M, Tyan T, et al. Structural optimization for vehicle pitch and drop. SAE paper 2006-01-0316, 2006.
    • 13. Alleyne A and Hedrick JK. Nonlinear adaptive control of active suspensions. IEEE Trans Control Systems Technol 1995; 3(1): 94-102.
    • 14. Yue C, Butsuen T and Hedrick JK. Alternative control laws for automotive active suspensions. Trans ASME, J Dynamics Systems, Measmt Control 1989; 111: 286-290.
    • 15. Ting WE and Lin JS. Nonlinear control design of antilock braking systems combined with active suspensions. In: 5th Asian control conference, Melbourne, Australia, 20-23 July 2004, vol. 1, pp.611-616. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
    • 16. Mastandrea M and Vangi D. Influence of braking force in low-speed vehicle collisions. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2005; 219(2): 151-164.
    • 17. Hogan I and Manning W. The use of vehicle dynamic control systems for automotive collision mitigation. In: 3rd Institution of Engineering and Technology conference on automotive electronics, Warwick, UK, 28-29 June 2007, pp.1-10. Stevenage, Hertfordshire: Institution of Engineering and Technology.
    • 18. Hogan I and Manning W. The development of a vehicle collision mitigation control system through multibody modelling. In: 32nd FISITA world automotive congress, Munich, Germany, 14-19 September 2008, paper F2008- 08-055. London: FISITA.
    • 19. Hogan I. The use of vehicle dynamic control systems for automotive collision mitigation. PhD Thesis, Department of Engineering and Technology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK, 2008.
    • 20. Emori RI. Analytical approach to automobile collisions. SAE paper 680016, 1968.
    • 21 Kamal MM. Analysis and simulation of vehicle to barrier impact. SAE paper 700414, 1970.
    • 22. Khattab A. Investigation of an adaptable crash energy management system to enhance vehicle crashworthiness. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University, Canada, 2010.
    • 23. Pennestr ı` E, Valentini PP and Vita L. Comfort analysis of car occupants: comparison between multibody and finite element models. Int J Veh Systems Modelling Testing 2005; 1(1-3): 68-78.
    • 24. Zhang H, Parenteau CS, Katta D and Raman SV. Applications of human body model in a vehicle environment. In: 9th International MADYMO User Conference, Como, Italy, 10-11 October 2002. Como: TNO Automotive.
    • 25. Renneker DN. A basic study of 'energy-absorbing' vehicle structure and occupant restraints by mathematical model. SAE paper 670897, 1967.
    • 26. Weaver JR. A simple occupant dynamics model. J Biomech 1968; 1(3): 185-191.
    • 27. Ilie S and Tabacu S. Study of the occupant's kinematics during the frontal impact. Ann Oradea Univ, Fascicle Managmt Technol Engng 2007; 6(16): 542-551.
    • 28. Paulitz TJ, Blackketter DM and Rink KK. Constant force restraints for frontal collisions. Proc IMechE Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2006; 220(9): 1177-1189.
    • 29. Roberts VL and Robins DH. Multidimensional mathematical modeling of occupant dynamics under crash conditions. SAE paper 690248, 1969.
    • 30. Transport Research Laborotory. Adaptive vehicle structures for secondary safety, http://www.transportresearch foundation.co.uk/PDF/Adaptive%20vehicle%20struc tures%20for% 20secondary%20safety_PPR310.PDF (1995).
    • 31. Elkady M, Elmarakbi A, and Crolla D. A new mathematical model to study the influence of vehicle dynamics control on vehicle collision. In: 33rd FISITA world automotive congress, Budapest, Hungary, 30 May-4 June 2010, paper F2010-C-113. London: FISITA.
    • m23 l1l3 u_ u_3 sin (b l5½sin g
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article