LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha; Adams, Andrew Alexander; Rassool, Naz; Williams, Shirley Ann (2013)
Publisher: Redfame Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Communal Internet access facilities or telecentres are considered a good way to provide connectivity to people who do not possess home connectivity. Attempts are underway to utilize telecentres as eLearning centres providing access to learning materials to students who would otherwise not be able to take up eLearning. This paper reports on the findings of qualitative interviews conducted with 18 undergraduate students from two Sri Lankan universities on their eLearning experiences using communal Internet access centres. The findings suggest that despite the efforts by telecentres to provide a good service to eLearners, there are various problems faced by students including: costs, logistics, scarcity of resources, connectivity speeds, excessive procedures, and lack of support. The experiences of these Sri Lankan students suggest that there is much that needs to be understood about user perspectives in using telecentres, which could help formulate better policies and strategies to support eLearners who depend on communal access facilities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baggaley, J., & Batpurev, B. (2007). The World-Wide Inaccessible Web, Part 1: Browsing. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/438/917
    • Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203463772
    • Castells, M. (2000). End of Millennium (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444323436
    • Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka (2009). Computer Literacy Survey - 2009 Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.statistics.gov.lk/CLS/BuletinComputerLiteracy_2009.pdf
    • Gaiani, S., Hansson, H., Meegammana, N., & Mozelius, P. (2009). Critical Issues for E-Learning Telecentres in Sri Lanka and India. Paper presented at the M-2009. 23rd ICDE World Conference on Open Learning and Distance Education.
    • Gamage, P., & Halpin, E. F. (2007). E-Sri Lanka: bridging the digital divide. The Electronic Library, 25(6), 693-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470710837128
    • Jamtsho, S., Rinchen, S., Sangi, N. A., Ahmed, S., Wikramanayake, G. N., Wimalaratne, P., et al. (2010). Accessibility, Acceptance and Effects of Distance Education in South Asia. In J. Baggaley & T. Belawati (Eds.), Distance Education Technology in Asia, 33-56, New Delhi, India and Ottawa, Canada: Sage Publications India and International Development Research Centre.
    • Klein, N. (2002). No Logo. New York: Picador.
    • Liyanage, L. (2010). Technology Enabled Delivery of Distance Education: Challenges and Opportunities in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the World Conference on e-Lerning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education Orlando, Florida.
    • Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2012). Information Communication Technologies and Distance Education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities. PhD Thesis, University of Reading, Reading.
    • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., Rassool, N., & Williams, S. (2013). Telecentres and eLearning, British Journal of Educational Technology (in press).
    • Loxley, W., Ho, S., Vandenabeele, C., Gutierrez, L., & Chanmugam, S. (2003). Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors on Proposed Loan to the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka for the Distance Education Modernization Project.
    • Nielsen, J. (1993). Response Times: The 3 Important Limits. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.useit.com/papers/responsetime.html.
    • United Nations Statistics Division (2010, June 23, 2010). Millennium Development Goals Indicators: Internet Users per 100 Population Retrieved April 05, 2012, from http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/mdg/SeriesDetail.aspx?srid=605&crid=
    • van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequalities in the Information Society, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    • Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Wikramanayake, G., & Baggaley, J. (2010). Accessibility and Selection of Distance Education Media. In T. Belawati & J. Baggaley (Eds.), Policy and Practice in Asian Distance Education, 149-155, New Delhi, India and Ottawa, Canada: SAGE Publications India and International Development Research Centre.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article