LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bristow, Alexandra; Robinson, Sarah; Ratle, Olivier (2017)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Drawing on a dialectical approach to resistance, we conceptualise the latter as a multifaceted, pervasive and contradictory phenomenon. This enables us to examine the predicament in which early-career Critical Management Studies academics find themselves in the current times of academic insecurity and ‘excellence’, as gleaned through this group’s understandings of themselves as resisters and participants in the complex and contradictory forces constituting their field. We draw on 24 semi-structured interviews to map our participants’ accounts of themselves as resisters in terms of different approaches to tensions and contradictions between, on the one hand, the interviewees’ Critical Management Studies alignment and, on the other, the ethos of business school neoliberalism. Emerging from this analysis are three contingent and interlinked narratives of resistance and identity – diplomatic, combative and idealistic – each of which encapsulates a particular mode (negotiation, struggle, and laying one’s own path) of engaging with the relationship between Critical Management Studies and the business school ethos. The three narratives show how early-career Critical Management Studies academics not only use existing tensions, contradictions, overlaps and alliances between these positions to resist and comply with selected forces within each, but also contribute to the (re-)making of such overlaps, alliances, tensions and contradictions. Through this reworking of what it means to be both Critical Management Studies scholars and business school academics, we argue, early-career Critical Management Studies academics can be seen as active resisters and re-constituters of their complex field.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). Introduction. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619-644.
    • Anderson, G. (2008). Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university. Organization, 15, 251-270.
    • Archer, L. (2008). The new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics' constructions of professional identity. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 265-285.
    • Bévort, F. & Suddaby, R. (2016) Scripting professional identities: how individuals make sense of contradictory institutional logics. Journal of Professions and Organization, 3, 17-38.
    • Bristow, A. (2012). On life, death and radical critique: A non-survival guide to the Brave New Higher Education for the intellectually pregnant. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28, 234-241.
    • Butler, N., & Spoelstra, S. (2012). Your excellency. Organization, 19, 891-903.
    • Butler, N., & Spoelstra, S. (2014). The regime of excellence and the erosion of ethos in Critical Management Studies. British Journal of Management, 25, 538-550.
    • Carroll, B., & Nicholson, H. (2014). Resistance and struggle in leadership development. Human Relations, 67, 1413-1436.
    • Clarke, C.A. & Knights, D. (2015). Careering through academia: Securing identities or engaging ethical subjectivities? Human Relations, 68, 1865-1888.
    • Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, C., Carter, C. & Rhodes, C. (2006). For management? Management Learning, 37, 7-27.
    • Contu, A. (2008). Decaf resistance: On Misbeavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 364-370.
    • Collinson, D. L. (2000). Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace. In Grint, K. (Ed.), Work and society: A reader (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Collinson, D. L. (2003) Identities and insecurities: selves at work. Organization, 10, 527-547.
    • Collinson, D. L. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58, 1419-1442.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Published in

Cite this article