LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Warner, Anthony (2007)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This article sets out to clarify the contribution of syntactic properties and subject weight for variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in a database of fourteenth and fifteenth-century prose. It sets out the syntactic structures which are assumed, and investigates the impact on ordering of a set of factors, using established quantitative methodologies. A series of conclusions includes the continuing distinct status of initial then, the systematic importance of clause-final position, the different impacts of subject length in different contexts, and the presence of a definiteness effect for the late placement of a subject after a nonfinite unaccusative.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Boekken, B. (1998). Word order patterns in Early Modern English. Studia Anglistica Norwegica 9. Bergen: Novus.
    • Bech, K. (2001). Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: a syntactic and pragmatic study. Doctor Artium dissertation, University of Bergen, Dept of English.
    • Belletti, A. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34.
    • Bergen, L. van (2003). Pronouns and word order in Old English: with particular reference to the indefinite pronoun man. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge.
    • Birner, B. J. (1994). Information status and word order: an analysis of English inversion. Language 70: 233-59.
    • Birner, B. J. & G. Ward (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    • Breivik, L. E. & T. Swan (1994). Initial adverbials and word order in English with special reference to the Early Modern English period. In Kastovsky, D. (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 11-43.
    • Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: a Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    • Cardinaletti, A. & I. Roberts (2002). Clause structure and X-second. In Cinque, G. (ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123-66.
    • Culicover, P. & R. Levine (2001). Stylistic inversion in English: a reconsideration. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 283-310.
    • Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman & W. van der Wurff (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Foster, T. & W. van der Wurff (1995). The survival of object-verb order in Middle English: some data. Neophilologus 79: 309-27.
    • Fries, C. C. (1940). On the development of the structural use of word-order in Modern English. Language 16: 199-208.
    • Green, G. M. (1980). Some wherefores of English inversions. Language 56: 582-601.
    • Green, G. M. (2004). Review of Postverbal behavior, by Thomas Wasow. Language 80: 327-31.
    • Haeberli, E. (1999). On the word order 'XP-subject' in the Germanic languages. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 1-36.
    • Haeberli, E. (2001). Adjuncts and the syntax of subjects in Old and Middle English. In Pintzuk, S., G. Tsoulas & A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: models and mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 109-31.
    • Haeberli, E. (2002a). Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English. In Lightfoot, D. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 88-106.
    • Haeberli, E. (2002b). Observations on the loss of Verb Second in the history of English. In Zwart, C. J-W. & W. Abraham (eds.), Studies in comparative syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 245-72.
    • Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hulk, A. & A. van Kemenade (1993). Subjects, nominative case, agreement and functional heads. Lingua 89: 181-215.
    • Hulk, A. & A. van Kemenade (1997). Negation as a reflex of clause structure. In Forget, D., P. Hirschbu¨ hler, F. Martineau & Maria-Luisa Rivero (eds.), Negation and polarity: syntax and semantics. Selected papers from the colloquium Negation: Syntax and Semantics. Ottawa, 11-13 May 1995. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 183-207.
    • Jacobsson, B. (1951). Inversion in English with special reference to the Early Modern English period. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    • Kemenade, A. van (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
    • Kemenade, A. van (1997). V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In van Kemenade, A. & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 326-51.
    • Kemenade, A. van (1999). Sentential negation and clause structure in Old English. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I., G. Tottie & W. van der Wurff (eds.), Negation in the history of English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 147-65.
    • Kemenade, A. van (2000). Jespersen's Cycle revisited: formal properties of grammaticalization. In Pintzuk, S., G. Tsoulas & A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: models and mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 51-74.
    • Kohonen, V. (1978). On the development of English word order in religious prose around 1000 and 1200 A.D.: a quantitive study of word order in context. Abo: Research Institute of the Abo Akademi Foundation.
    • Koopman, W. F. (1998). Inversion after single and multiple topics in Old English. In Fisiak, J. & M. Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics (1996). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 135-50.
    • Kroch, A. & A. Taylor (1997). Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation and language contact. In van Kemenade, A. & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 297-324.
    • Kroch, A. & A. Taylor (2000). Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. See http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora
    • Kroch, A., A. Taylor & D. Ringe (2001). The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In Henning, S., P. van Reenen & L. SchPsler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. 353-92.
    • Nevalainen, T. (1997). Recycling inversion: the case of initial adverbs and negators in Early Modern English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31: 203-14.
    • Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusativity hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistic Society. 157-89.
    • Pintzuk, S. (1993). Verb seconding in Old English: verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5-35.
    • Pintzuk, S. (1999). Phrase structures in competition: variation and change in Old English word order. New York and London: Garland. Reprint with minor revisions of 1991 University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.
    • Poutsma, H. (1928). A grammar of Late Modern English. Part 1. First half. Groningen: Noordhoff.
    • Prince, E. (1992). The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Thompson, S. A. & W. C. Mann (eds.), Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 295-325.
    • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
    • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    • Rand, D. & D. Sankoff (1990). GoldVarb: a variable rule application for the MacIntosh. Montre´al: Centre de recherches mathe´matiques, Universite´ de Montre´al.
    • Rissanen, M. et al. The Helsinki corpus of English texts. Middle English sections compiled by J. Hannula, L. Koskinen, S. Nevanlinna, P. Pahta, K. Peitsara & I. Taavitsainen at the University of Helsinki under the direction of M. Rissanen. See http://www.eng.helsinki.fi/varieng/main/corpora1.htm
    • Schmidt, D. A. (1980). A history of inversion in English. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
    • Stockwell, R. P. (1984). On the history of the verb-second rule in English. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical syntax. The Hague: Mouton. 575-92.
    • Swan, T. (1988). Sentence adverbials in English: a synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.
    • Tagliamonte, S. A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wasow, T. (1997). Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9: 81-105.
    • Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    • Wurff, W. van der (1999). Objects and verbs in modern Icelandic and fifteenth-century English: a word order parallel and its causes. Lingua 109: 237-65.
    • Treatises of MS Arundel 507 (On Grace, Our Daily Work). In C. Horstman (ed.) (1895) Yorkshire Writers vol. I. London: Sonnenschein. 132-56.
    • The northern prose version of the Rule of St Benet. In Ernst A. Kock (ed.) (1902) Three Middle-English versions of the Rule of St Benet. EETS 120. 1-47.
    • Osbern Bokenham. Mappula Anglie. C. Horstman (ed.) (1887) Englische Studien 10: 6-34.
    • The Brut or The Chronicles of England. Part I. Friedrich W. D. Brie (ed.) (1906) EETS 131.
    • John Capgrave. Abbreviation of Chronicles. P. J. Lucas (ed.) (1983) EETS 285.
    • The Cely Letters 1472-1488. A. Hanham (ed.) (1975) EETS 273.
    • Geoffrey Chaucer. A Treatise on the Astrolabe. In F. N. Robinson (ed.) (1957) The works of Geoffrey Chaucer, 2nd edition. London: Oxford University Press.
    • The Cloud of Unknowing and the Book of Privy Counselling. Phyllis Hodgson (ed.) (1944, reprinted with minor revisions 1958, 1972). EETS 218.
    • John Drury. In Samuel B. Meech (ed.) (1934) John Drury and his English writings. Speculum 9: 70-83.
    • Dan John Gaytrick. The Layfolk's Catechism. T. F. Simmons and H. E. Nolloth (eds.) (1901) EETS 118.
    • Walter Hilton's Mixed Life, ed. from Lambeth Palace MS 472. S. J. Ogilvie-Thomson (ed.) (1986) Salzburg: Institut fu¨ r Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Universita¨t Salzburg.
    • The Book of Margery Kempe. Samuel B. Meech (ed.) (1940) EETS 212.
    • Richard Lavenham. A Litil Tretys on the Seven Deadly Sins. J. P. W. M. van Zutphen (ed.) (1956) Rome: Institutum Carmelitanum.
    • Hugo Legat's Worcester Sermon. In D. M. Grisdale (ed.) (1939) Three Middle English sermons from the Worcester Chapter Manuscript F. 10. Leeds School of English Language Texts and Monographs V. 1-21.
    • Sir Thomas Malory. E. Vinaver (ed.) (1954) The works of Sir Thomas Malory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • John Metham. The works of John Metham. Hardin Craig (ed.) (1916). EETS 132.
    • Dan Michel. Ayenbite of Inwyt. Pamela Gradon (ed.) (1965) EETS 23.
    • Richard Misyn. The Fire of Love and The Mending of Life. Rev. R. Harvey (ed.) (1896) EETS 106.
    • Mirk's Festial. T. Erbe (ed.) (1905) EETS ES 96.
    • Julian of Norwich's Revelations of Divine Love. The shorter version, ed. from BL Add MS 37790. Frances Beer (ed.) (1978) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    • Orcherd of Syon. Phyllis Hodgson & Gabriel M. Liegey (eds.) EETS 258.
    • Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century, part 1. Norman Davis (ed.) (1971). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • A Revelation of Purgatory by an unknown fifteenth-century woman visionary. Marta Powell Harley (ed.) (1985). Lewiston and Queenston: Edwin Mellor Press.
    • Richard Rolle. The Form of Living. In C. Horstman (ed.) (1895) Yorkshire writers, vol. I. London: Sonnenschein. 1-49.
    • The 'Ashmole' version: The Secrete of Secretes. In M. Manzalaoui (ed.) (1976) Secretum Secretorum. EETS 276. 18-113.
    • The Stonor letters and papers 1290-1483. C. L. Kingsford (ed.) (1919). Camden Society 3rd series vols. 29, 30.
    • The Vision of William of Stranton. In Robert Easting (ed.) (1991) St Patrick's Purgatory. EETS 298. 78-117.
    • John of Trevisa. Polychronicon. J. R. Lumby (ed.) (1876, 1882) Rolls Series 41. vols. VI, VIII. London.
    • The earliest English translation of Vegetius' De Re Militari, G. Lester (ed.) (1988) Middle English Texts 21. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    • Book of Vices and Virtues. W. Nelson Francis (ed.) (1942) EETS 217.
    • Wimbledon's sermon. Redde Rationem Villicationis Tue. Ione Kemp Knight (ed.) (1967). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
    • English Wyclifite sermons, vol. III Ferial sermons. Anne Hudson (ed.) (1990). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article