LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Griffiths, Frances; Bendelow, Gillian; Green, Eileen; Palmer, Julie (2010)
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0254

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: skin and connective tissue diseases
Women’s perspectives on breast screening (mammography and breast awareness) were explored in interviews with midlife women sampled for diversity of background and health experience. Attending mammography screening was considered a social obligation despite women’s fears and experiences of discomfort. Women gave considerable legitimacy to mammography visualizations of the breast, and the expert interpretation of these. In comparison, women lacked confidence in breast awareness practices, directly comparing their sensory capabilities with those of the mammogram, although mammography screening did not substitute breast awareness in a straightforward way. The authors argue that reliance on visualizing technology may create a fragmented sense of the body, separating the at risk breast from embodied experience. \ud \ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening (2006) Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future. Sheffield, NHS Screening Programmes.
    • Austoker, J. (2003) Breast Self Examination. British Medical Journal, 326, 1-2.
    • Babrow, A. S. & Kline, K. N. (2000) From "reducing" to "coping with" uncertainty: reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 1805-1816.
    • Banks, E., Beral, V., Cameron, R., Hogg, A., Langley, N., Barnes, I., Bull, D., Reeves, G., English, R., Taylor, S., Elliman, J. & Harris, C. (2002) Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Research, 4, R1.
    • Brown, N. & Webster, A. (2004) New Medical Technologies and Society: reordering life, Cambridge, Polity.
    • Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., Mccormick, S., Mandelbaum, J. & Luebke, T. (2001) Print media coverage of environmental causation of breast cancer. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23, 747-775.
    • Bush, J. (2000) "It's just part of being a woman": Cervical Screening, the Body and Femininity. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 429-444.
    • Cancer Research UK (2004) Breast Cancer and Breast Screening CancerStats Report. London, Cancer Research UK.
    • Dixon, J. M. (2006) Screening for breast cancer. British Medical Journal, 332, 499- 500.
    • Economic and Social Data Service (n.d.) ESDS Qualidata website [Online] Available from: http://www.esds.ac.uk/qualidata/ (accessed 01 Dec 2008)
    • Ehrenreich, B. (2001) Welcome to Cancerland: A mammogram leads to a cult of pink kitsch. Harper's Magazine, November, 43-53.
    • Europa Donna (2009) The European Breast Cancer Coalition Guide to Breast Health, Milan, The European Breast Cancer Coalition.
    • Fish, J. & Wilkinson, S. (2003) Understanding Lesbian's Healthcare Behaviour: The Case of Breast Self-Examination. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 235-245.
    • Fitzpatrick, M. (2006) The Men's Health Movement: A Morbid Symptom. Journal of Men's Health and Gender, 3, 258-262.
    • Forrest, A. P. M. (1986) Breast Cancer Screening: Report to the Health Minister of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Island. London, HMSO.
    • Gibbon, S. (2007) Breast Cancer Genes and the Gendering of Knowledge: Science and Citizenship in the Cultural Context of the 'New' Genetics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Gøtzsche, P. C. & Nielson, M. (2006) Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography. Cochrane Databse of Systematic Reviews, 4.
    • Green, E., Griffiths, F. & Thompson, D. (2006) 'Are My Bones Normal Doctor?' The Role of Technology in Understanding and Communicating Health Risks for Midlife Women. Sociological Research Online, 11, not paginated.
    • Green, E., Thompson, D. & Griffiths, F. E. (2002) Narratives of Risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies. Health Risk and Society, 4, 243-86.
    • Green, E. & Wadsworth, G. (1998a) Disintegrating bodies: an analysis of women's experiences of the menopausal body. Making Sense of the Body: Theory Research and Practice. British Sociological Association.
    • Green, J. & Thorogood, N. (2004) Qualitative Methods for Health Research, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Griffiths, F. (1999a) Women's control and choice regarding HRT. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 469-481.
    • Griffiths, F. & Green, E. (2003) A normal biological process? Brittle bones, HRT and the patient-doctor encounter. IN Williams, S., Birke, L. & Bendelow, G. (Eds.) Debating Biology : Sociological Reflections on Health, Medicine, and Society. London, Routledge.
    • Griffiths, F., Green, E. & Bendelow, G. (2006) Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty: a study focusing on women at midlife. Soc. Sci. Med., 62, 1078-1090.
    • Griffiths, F., Green, E. & Tsouroufli, M. (2005) The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 330, 7490.
    • Griffiths, F. E. (1995) Women's Health Concerns: Is the promotion of hormone replacement therapy for prevention important to women? Family Practice, 12, 54-59.
    • Griffiths, F. E. (1999b) Women's control and choice regarding HRT. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 469-481.
    • Griffiths, F. E., Green, E. E., Bendelow, G. & Backett-Milburn, K. (2003) Innovative Health Technologies at Women's Midlife; Theory and Diversity among women and Experts (L218252038). ESRC.
    • Gunderman, R. B. (2005) The Medical Community's Changing Vision of the Patient: The Importance of Radiology. Radiology, 234, 339-342.
    • Haraway, D. J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature., London, Free Association Books.
    • Henwood, F. (2001) In/different Screening: Contesting Medical Knowledge in an Antenatal Setting. IN Henwood, F., Kennedy, H. & Miller, N. (Eds.) Cyborg Lives? Women's Technobiographies. York, Raw Nerve.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article