LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Alt, Elisa; Díez de Castro, Emilio Pablo; Lloréns Montes, Francisco Javier (2015)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Natural-Resource-Based View (NRBV), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Proactive Environmental Strategies (PES), Employee Stakeholders, Shared Vision, Environmental Performance, Organisations and the Natural Environment (ONE), Stakeholder Integration, Environmental Management
Drawing on the natural-resource-based view, we propose that employee stakeholder integration is linked to environmental performance through firms’ proactive environmental strategies, and that this link is contingent on shared vision. We tested our model with a cross-country and multi-industry sample. In support of our theory, results revealed that firms’ proactive environmental strategies translated employee stakeholder integration into environmental performance. This relationship was pronounced for high levels of shared vision. Our findings demonstrate that shared vision represents a key condition for advancing the corporate greening agenda through proactive environmental strategies. We discuss implications for the CSR and environmental management literatures, with a particular focus on the natural-resource-based view and stakeholder integration debates Unión Europea E06D101365BR
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
    • Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
    • Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62.
    • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 548-570.
    • Anton, W. R. Q., Deltas, G., & Khanna, M. (2004). Incentives for environmental selfregulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(1), 632-654.
    • Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556-567.
    • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103.
    • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Matías-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 964-975.
    • Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-López, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 357-381.
    • Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
    • Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S. & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106-122.
    • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
    • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    • Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274-289.
    • Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). Postcards from the edge: A review of the business and environment literature. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 513-547.
    • Boiral, O. (2002). Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 291-317.
    • Boiral, O. (2005). The impact of operator involvement in pollution reduction: Case studies in Canadian chemical companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(6), 339-360.
    • Bowen, F. E. (2007). Corporate social strategy: Competing views from two theories of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 97-113.
    • Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1075-1095.
    • Brenneke, M., & Spitzeck, H. (2010). Social intrapreneurs - Bottom-up social innovation. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 157-176.
    • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
    • Bunge, J., Cohen-Rosenthal, E., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, A. (1996). Employee participation in pollution reduction: Preliminary analysis of the Toxics Release Inventory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 4(1), 9-16.
    • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.
    • Buzzelli, D. T. (1991). Time to structure an environmental policy strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 12(2), 17-20.
    • Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
    • Cantor, D. E., Morrow, P. C., & Montabon, F. (2012). Engagement in environmental behaviors among supply chain management employees: An organizational support theoretical perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3), 33-51.
    • Chan, R. Y. K. (2005). Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 625-672.
    • Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
    • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
    • Clemens, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 492-500.
    • years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317.
    • Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281-293.
    • Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: The case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 343-358.
    • Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences, 38(2-3), 91-106.
    • Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
    • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
    • Earley, K. (2013a). The Co-operative: Food employees are energy-saving heroes. The Guardian Sustainable Business Sustainability Case Studies. Retrieved December 7, 2013 from
    • Earley, K. (2013b). B&Q - One Planet Home: Powered by employees. The Guardian Sustainable Business Sustainability Case Studies. Retrieved December 7, 2013 from Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, 14(4), 319-339.
    • Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305-323.
    • Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-276.
    • Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. (1996). Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 715-730.
    • Florida, R. (1996). Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review, 39(1), 80-105.
    • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
    • García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Mihi-Ramírez, A. (2011). The influence of strategic dynamic capabilities on organizational outcomes through the organizational learning process. Industry and Innovation, 18(7), 685-708.
    • González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2006). A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 87-102.
    • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
    • Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: Learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1087-1109.
    • Hanna, M. D., Newman, W. R., & Johnson, P. (2000). Linking operational and environmental improvement through employee involvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 148-165.
    • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 2045), 986-1014.
    • Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189.
    • Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73.
    • Lindley, E., & Wheeler, F. P. (2000). The learning square: Four domains that impact on strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(4), 357-364.
    • Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2012). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23, 382-391.
    • Linnenluecke, M. K., Russell, S. V., & Griffiths, A. (2009). Subcultures and sustainability practices: The impact on understanding corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 432-452.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
    • Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. L. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 329-351.
    • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
    • Nederhof, A. J. (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-280.
    • Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377-391.
    • Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Ferrón-Vílchez, V. (2012). The effect of director interlocks on firms' adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164-178.
    • Oswald, S. L., Mossholder, K. W., & Harris, S. G. (1994). Vision salience and strategic involvement: Implications for psychological attachment to organization and job. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 477-489.
    • Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.
    • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
    • Pearce, C. G., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 259-278.
    • Pfeffer. J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
    • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    • Powell, T. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15-37.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article