LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Htike, KK; Hogg, DC (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Successful detection and localisation of pedestrians is an important goal in computer vision which is a core area in Artificial Intelligence. State-of-the-art pedestrian detectors proposed in literature have reached impressive performance on certain datasets. However, it has been pointed out that these detectors tend not to perform very well when applied to specific scenes that differ from the training datasets in some ways. Due to this, domain adaptation approaches have recently become popular in order to adapt existing detectors to new domains to improve the performance in those domains. There is a real need to review and analyse critically the state-of-the-art domain adaptation algorithms, especially in the area of object and pedestrian detection. In this paper, we survey the most relevant and important state-of-the-art results for domain adaptation for image and video data, with a particular focus on pedestrian detection. Related areas to domain adaptation are also included in our review and we make observations and draw conclusions from the representative papers and give practical recommendations on which methods should be preferred in different situations that practitioners may encounter in real-life.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] A. Andreopoulos, J. K. Tsotsos, 50 years of object recognition: Directions forward, Computer Vision and Image Understanding (2013) 827-891.
    • [2] P. Dolla´r, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, P. Perona, Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34 (4) (2012) 743-761.
    • [3] M. Enzweiler, D. M. Gavrila, Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31 (12) (2009) 2179-2195.
    • [4] D. Geronimo, A. M. Lopez, A. D. Sappa, T. Graf, Survey of pedestrian detection for advanced driver assistance systems, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32 (7) (2010) 1239-1258.
    • [5] N. Dalal, B. Triggs, Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005, pp. 886-893.
    • [6] R. B. Girshick, P. F. Felzenszwalb, D. A. Mcallester, Object detection with grammar models, in: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2011, pp. 442-450.
    • [7] P. Dolla´r, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, P. Perona, Pedestrian detection: A benchmark, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009, pp. 304-311.
    • [8] A. Torralba, A. A. Efros, Unbiased look at dataset bias, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 1521-1528.
    • [9] P. M. Roth, S. Sternig, H. Grabner, H. Bischof, Classifier grids for robust adaptive object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009, pp. 2727-2734.
    • [10] M. Wang, W. Li, X. Wang, Transferring a generic pedestrian detector towards specific scenes, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 3274-3281.
    • [11] M. Wang, X. Wang, Automatic adaptation of a generic pedestrian detector to a specific traffic scene, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 3401-3408.
    • [12] J. Ferryman, A. Shahrokni, PETS 2009: Dataset and challenge, in: IEEE International Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS-Winter), 2009, pp. 1-6.
    • [13] S. J. Pan, Q. Yang, A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22 (10) (2010) 1345-1359.
    • [14] M. Everingham, L. J. V. Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. M. Winn, A. Zisserman, The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) challenge, International Journal of Computer Vision 88 (2) (2010) 303-338.
    • [15] G. B. Huang, M. Ramesh, T. Berg, E. Learned-Miller, Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments, Tech. Rep. 07-49, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (October 2007).
    • [16] K.-C. Lee, J. Ho, D. Kriegman, Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27 (5) (2005) 684-698.
    • [17] J. Blitzer, R. T. McDonald, F. Pereira, Domain adaptation with Structural Correspondence Learning, in: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2006, pp. 120-128.
    • [18] D. McClosky, E. Charniak, M. Johnson, Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation, in: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006, pp. 337-344.
    • [19] B. Roark, M. Bacchiani, Supervised and unsupervised PCFG adaptation to novel domains, in: North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLTNAACL), 2003, pp. 126-133.
    • [20] R. Hwa, Supervised grammar induction using training data with limited constituent information, in: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 1999, pp. 73-79.
    • [21] K. Saenko, B. Kulis, M. Fritz, T. Darrell, Adapting visual category models to new domains, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2010, pp. 213-226.
    • [22] B. Kulis, K. Saenko, T. Darrell, What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 1785-1792.
    • [23] L. P. Eisenhart, Riemannian geometry, Princeton university press, 1997.
    • [24] P. Turaga, A. Veeraraghavan, R. Chellappa, Statistical analysis on stiefel and grassmann manifolds with applications in computer vision, in: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1-8.
    • [25] R. Gopalan, R. Li, R. Chellappa, Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011, pp. 999-1006.
    • [26] J. W. Milnor, Characteristic classes, Princeton University Press, 1974.
    • [27] B. Gong, Y. Shi, F. Sha, K. Grauman, Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 2066-2073.
    • [28] F. Mirrashed, M. Rastegari, Domain adaptive classification, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013, pp. 2608-2615.
    • [29] B. Bose, W. E. L. Grimson, Improving object classification in far-field video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, pp. 181-188.
    • [30] B. Wu, R. Nevatia, Improving part based object detection by unsupervised, online boosting, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2007, pp. 1-8.
    • [31] A. Kembhavi, B. Siddiquie, R. Miezianko, S. McCloskey, L. S. Davis, Incremental multiple kernel learning for object recognition, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2009, pp. 638-645.
    • [32] X. Wang, G. Hua, T. X. Han, Detection by detections: Non-parametric detector adaptation for a video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 350-357.
    • [33] P. Sharma, C. Huang, R. Nevatia, Unsupervised incremental learning for improved object detection in a video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 3298- 3305.
    • [34] J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of Boosting, Annals of Statistics 28 (1998) 337-407.
    • [35] T. G. Dietterich, R. H. Lathrop, T. Lozano-Pe´rez, Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles, Artificial Intelligence 89 (1) (1997) 31-71.
    • [36] L. F.-F. D. K. Kevin Tang, Vignesh Ramanathan, Shifting weights: Adapting object detectors from image to video, in: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2012, pp. 638-646.
    • [37] V. Jain, S. S. Farfade, Adapting classification cascades to new domains, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013, pp. 105-112.
    • [38] P. Sharma, R. Nevatia, Efficient detector adaptation for object detection in a video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013, pp. 3254-3261.
    • [39] M. O¨zuysal, M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, P. Fua, Fast keypoint recognition using random ferns, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32 (3) (2010) 448-461.
    • [40] F. Mirrashed, V. I. Morariu, L. S. Davis, Sampling for unsupervised domain adaptive object detection, in: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2013, pp. 3288-3292.
    • [41] S. J. Pan, I. W. Tsang, J. T. Kwok, Q. Yang, Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis, in: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2009, pp. 1187-1192.
    • [42] G. Shu, A. Dehghan, M. Shah, Improving an object detector and extracting regions using superpixels, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013, pp. 3721-3727.
    • [43] X. Wang, X. Ma, W. E. L. Grimson, Unsupervised activity perception in crowded and complicated scenes using hierarchical bayesian models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31 (3) (2009) 539-555.
    • [44] Y. W. Teh, M. I. Jordan, M. J. Beal, D. M. Blei, Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes, Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (476) (2006) 1566-1581.
    • [45] K. K. Htike, D. Hogg, Efficient non-iterative domain adaptation of pedestrian detectors to video scenes, in: Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2014 22nd International Conference on, IEEE, 2014, pp. 654-659.
    • [46] X. Glorot, A. Bordes, Y. Bengio, Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach, in: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), 2011, pp. 513-520.
    • [47] K. K. Htike, D. Hogg, Unsupervised detector adaptation by joint dataset feature learning, in: Computer Vision and Graphics, Springer, 2014, pp. 270-277.
    • [48] S. Chopra, S. Balakrishnan, R. Gopalan, Dlid: Deep learning for domain adaptation by interpolating between domains, in: ICML workshop on challenges in representation learning, Vol. 2, 2013, p. 5.
    • [49] Y. Bengio, Deep learning of representations for unsupervised and transfer learning, Unsupervised and Transfer Learning Challenges in Machine Learning 7 (2012) 19.
    • [50] H. Samet, M. Tamminen, Efficient component labeling of images of arbitrary dimension represented by linear bintrees, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 10 (4) (1988) 579-586.
    • [51] M. Piccardi, Background subtraction techniques: a review, in: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2004, pp. 3099-3104.
    • [52] S. Brutzer, B. Ho¨ ferlin, G. Heidemann, Evaluation of background subtraction techniques for video surveillance, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 1937-1944.
    • [53] S.-C. S. Cheung, C. Kamath, Robust techniques for background subtraction in urban traffic video, in: Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 5308, 2004, pp. 881-892.
    • [54] V. Nair, J. J. Clark, An unsupervised, online learning framework for moving object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, pp. 317-324.
    • [55] P. M. Roth, H. Grabner, D. Skocaj, H. Bischol, A. Leonardis, On-line conservative learning for person detection, in: Proc. IEEE Intern. Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS), 2005, pp. 223-230.
    • [56] H. Grabner, P. M. Roth, H. Bischof, Is pedestrian detection really a hard task?, in: Proc. IEEE Intern. Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS), 2007, pp. 1-8.
    • [57] M. Heikkila¨, M. Pietika¨inen, A texture-based method for modeling the background and detecting moving objects, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28 (4) (2006) 657-662.
    • [58] S. Stalder, H. Grabner, L. Gool, Exploring context to learn scene specific object detectors, in: Proc. IEEE Intern. Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS), 2009, pp. 63-70.
    • [59] A. Levin, P. A. Viola, Y. Freund, Unsupervised improvement of visual detectors using co-training, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2003, pp. 626-633.
    • [60] A. Blum, T. Mitchell, Combining labeled and unlabeled data with cotraining, in: The Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT), ACM, 1998, pp. 92-100.
    • [61] O. Javed, S. Ali, M. Shah, Online detection and classification of moving objects using progressively improving detectors, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005, pp. 696-701.
    • [62] C. Rosenberg, M. Hebert, H. Schneiderman, Semi-supervised selftraining of object detection models, in: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2005, pp. 29-36.
    • [63] K. Ali, D. Hasler, F. Fleuret, Flowboost - appearance learning from sparsely annotated video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 1433-1440.
    • [64] C. Galleguillos, B. Babenko, A. Rabinovich, S. J. Belongie, Weakly supervised object localization with stable segmentations, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2008, pp. 193- 207.
    • [65] M. Weber, M. Welling, P. Perona, Unsupervised learning of models for recognition, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2000, pp. 18-32.
    • [66] K. K. Htike, D. Hogg, Weakly supervised pedestrian detector training by unsupervised prior learning and cue fusion in videos, in: Image Processing (ICIP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2014, pp. 2338-2342.
    • [67] M. Blaschko, A. Vedaldi, A. Zisserman, Simultaneous object detection and ranking with weak supervision, in: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2010, pp. 235-243.
    • [68] M. Pandey, S. Lazebnik, Scene recognition and weakly supervised object localization with deformable part-based models, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), IEEE, 2011, pp. 1307-1314.
    • [69] A. Prest, C. Leistner, J. Civera, C. Schmid, V. Ferrari, Learning object class detectors from weakly annotated video, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012, pp. 3282-3289.
    • [70] S. Andrews, I. Tsochantaridis, T. Hofmann, Support Vector Machines for Multiple-instance Learning, in: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2002, pp. 561-568.
    • [71] Y. Chen, J. Z. Wang, Image categorization by learning and reasoning with regions, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 5 (2004) 913-939.
    • [72] O. Chum, A. Zisserman, An exemplar model for learning object classes, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, 2007, pp. 1-8.
    • [73] M. H. Nguyen, L. Torresani, F. de la Torre, C. Rother, Weakly supervised discriminative localization and classification: a joint learning process, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2009, pp. 1925-1932.
    • [74] T. Deselaers, B. Alexe, V. Ferrari, Localizing objects while learning their appearance, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2010, pp. 452-466.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article