LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Buldt, AK; Levinger, P; Murley, GS; Menz, HB; Nester, CJ; Landorf, KB (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QD, RA

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: body regions, human activities
Variations in foot posture are associated with the development of some lower limb injuries. However, the mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear. The objective of this study was to compare foot kinematics between normal, pes cavus and pes planus foot posture groups using a multi-segment foot model. Ninety-seven healthy adults, aged 18-47 were classified as either normal (n=37), pes cavus (n=30) or pes planus (n=30) based on normative data for the Foot Posture Index, Arch Index and normalised navicular height. A five segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux during barefoot walking at a self-selected speed. Angle at heel contact, peak angle, time to peak angle and range of motion was measured for each segment. One way ANOVAs with post hoc analyses of mean differences were used to compare foot posture groups. The pes cavus group demonstrated a distinctive pattern of motion compared to the normal and pes planus foot posture groups. Effect sizes of significant mean differences were large and comparable to similar studies. Three key differences in overall foot function were observed between the groups: (i) altered frontal and transverse plane angles of the rearfoot in the pes cavus foot; (ii) less midfoot motion in the pes cavus foot during initial contact and midstance; and (iii) reduced midfoot frontal plane ROM in the pes planus foot during pre-swing. These findings indicate that foot posture does influence motion of the foot.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bancroft, J.D. and Gamble, M. Theory and practice of histological techniques, 6e. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007; 744 p.
    • Eisenbarth, S.C., Colegio, O.R., O'Connor Jr, W., Sutterwala, F.S. and Flavell, R.A. Nature 2008; 453: 1122-1127 T P I
    • Eticha, D., Staß, A. and Horst, W. J. Localization of aluminium in the maize root apex: can morin detect cell wall-bound aluminium? J. ExperimRental Botany 2005; 56: 1351-1357.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article