Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fredriksen, E.H.; Harris, J.; Moland, K.M. (2016)
Publisher: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Journal: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: pelvic girdle pain, web-based discussion forums, health literacy, pregnancy, qualitative research, Original Paper, Internet

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education

Background: The Internet is one of the fastest growing information sources for pregnant women and seems to be used across social and economic strata. However, we still lack knowledge on how interaction in Web-based discussion forums influence maternal health literacy, in terms of how pregnant women access, appraise, and apply information to promote and maintain good health.

Objective: The aim of this study was to understand how Web-based discussion forums influence maternal health literacy; hence, we explored the role of interactions in Web-based discussion forums among women who experienced health problems during pregnancy. More specifically, we explored why media-literate women experiencing the medically unexplained condition, pelvic girdle pain (PGP), during pregnancy participated in Web-based discussion forums and how they appraised and applied the information and advice that they gained from the Web-based interaction with other women.

Methods: Women were invited to participate in the study via postings on 3 different open websites for pregnant women and mothers. The sample included 11 Norwegian women who participated in open Web-based discussion forums when experiencing PGP in pregnancy. The data were collected using synchronous qualitative email interviews and were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results:In our study sample, interaction in Web-based discussion forums influenced maternal health literacy in terms of increased health-related knowledge and competencies, increased awareness of health promotion and health protection, and increased system navigation. The women appraised and selectively applied information and advice that resonated with their own experiences. For many, the information provided online by other women in the same situation was valued more highly than advice from health professionals. Women reported that they used their knowledge and competency in encounters with health professionals but hesitated to disclose the origin of their knowledge. Those with a high level of education in medicine-related fields raised a concern about the Internet as a source of horror stories and erroneous information and were actively engaged in trying to minimize potential negative effects, by providing biomedical information.

Conclusions: The popularity of Web-based discussion forums among pregnant women suggests that this group needs additional sources of information and support to complement traditional consultations with the health professionals. The professionals need to recognize that pregnant women access Web-based discussion forums for support and information to increase their ability to take better health decisions for themselves. This is a potential resource that health professionals may find useful in consultations with pregnant women.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Lagan B, Sinclair M, Kernohan W. Pregnant women`s use of the internet: A review of published and unpublished evidence. Evidence Based Midwifery 2006;4(1):17-23.
    • 2. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: a web-based survey. Birth 2010 Jun;37(2):106-115. [doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x] [Medline: 20557533]
    • 3. Hardey M. Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociol Health & Illness 1999 Nov;21(6):820-835. [doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00185]
    • 4. Broom A. Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res 2005 Mar;15(3):325-345. [doi: 10.1177/1049732304272916] [Medline: 15761103]
    • 5. Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns 2009 Nov;77(2):266-271. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.028] [Medline: 19411157]
    • 6. Ziebland S, Wyke S. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health? Milbank Q 2012 Jun;90(2):219-249 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00662.x] [Medline: 22709387]
    • 7. Hardey M. 'The Story of My Illness': Personal Accounts of Illness on the Internet. Health: 2002 Jan 01;6(1):31-46. [doi: 10.1177/136345930200600103]
    • 8. Pitts V. Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health (London) 2004 Jan;8(1):33-59. [doi: 10.1177/1363459304038794] [Medline: 15018717]
    • 9. Barker KK. Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: the case of contested illness. J Health Soc Behav 2008 Mar;49(1):20-36. [Medline: 18418983]
    • 10. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the Internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth 2011 Dec;38(4):336-345. [doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00488.x] [Medline: 22112334]
    • 11. Gao L, Larsson M, Luo S. Internet use by Chinese women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery 2013 Jul;29(7):730-735. [doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.003] [Medline: 22958935]
    • 12. Larsson M. A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery 2009 Feb;25(1):14-20. [doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.010] [Medline: 17408822]
    • 13. Statistics Norway. Statistics Norway. Oslo: SSB; 2015. ICT usage in households URL: http://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken [accessed 2016-04-25] [WebCite Cache ID 6h200ribr]
    • 14. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke Stephan, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012;12:80 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80] [Medline: 22276600]
    • 15. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(2):e9 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9] [Medline: 16867972]
    • 16. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies in the 21st century. Health Promotion International 2000;15:259-267. [doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259]
    • 17. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-2078. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050] [Medline: 18952344]
    • 18. Gillis D. University of Nottingham. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2009. Exploring dimensions of health literacy: A case study of interventions to promote and support breast feeding URL: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11199/ [accessed 2016-04-30] [WebCite Cache ID 6h9Myiulb]
    • 19. Chinn D. Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis. Soc Sci Med 2011 Jul;73(1):60-67. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004] [Medline: 21640456]
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.