Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Becker, Julia C.; Butz, David A.; Sibley, Chris G.; Barlow, Fiona Kate; Bitacola, Lisa M.; Christ, Oliver; Khan, Sammyh S.; Leong, Chan-Hoong; Pehrson, Samuel; Srinivasan, Narayanan; Sulz, Aline; Tausch, Nicole; Urbanska, Karolina; Wright, Steven C. (2017)
Publisher: Sage Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF Psychology, Egalitarianism, Emotions, BF, National flags, Nationalism, Patriotism, Power, NDAS
We examined the concepts and emotions people associate with their national flag, and how these associations are related to nationalism and patriotism across 11 countries. Factor analyses indicated that the structures of associations differed across countries in ways that reflect their idiosyncratic historical developments. Positive emotions and egalitarian concepts were associated with national flags across countries. However, notable differences between countries were found due to historical politics. In societies known for being peaceful and open-minded (e.g., Canada, Scotland), egalitarianism was separable from honor-related concepts and associated with the flag; in countries that were currently involved in struggles for independence (e.g., Scotland) and countries with an imperialist past (United Kingdom), the flag was strongly associated with power-related concepts; in countries with a negative past (e.g., Germany), the primary association was sports; in countries with disruption due to separatist or extremist movements (e.g., Northern Ireland, Turkey), aggression-related concepts were not disassociated; in collectivist societies (India, Singapore), obedience was linked to positive associations and strongly associated with the flag. In addition, the more strongly individuals endorsed nationalism and patriotism, the more they associated positive emotions and egalitarian concepts with their flag. Implications of these findings are discussed. Postprint Peer reviewed
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amnesty International (2015). Annual report: Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/turkey/report-turkey/
    • Australian Government (2015, July 3). Australian national flag. Retrieved from http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/symbols/flag.cfm
    • Australian War Memorial (2016, August 8). ANZAC day. Retrieved from https://www.awm.gov.au/commemoration/anzac-day/
    • Becker, J. C., Enders-Comberg, A., Wagner, U., Christ, O., & Butz, D. A. (2012). Beware of national symbols: How flags can threaten intergroup relations. Social Psychology, 43, 3-6.
    • Bernstein, R. (2006, June 18). In world cup surprise, flags fly with German pride. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
    • Bow, B. (2008). Anti-Americanism in Canada, before and after Iraq, American Review of Canadian Studies, 38, 341-359.
    • Bryan, D., Stevenson, C., Gillespie, G., & Bell, J. (2010). Public displays of flags and emblems in Northern Ireland survey 2006-2009. Institute of Irish Studies, Queen's University Belfast.
    • Butz, D. A. (2009). National symbols as agents of psychological and social change. Political Psychology, 30, 779-804.
    • Butz, D. A., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2007). Liberty and justice for all? Implications of exposure to the U.S. flag for intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 396-408.
    • Butz, D.A., & Kunstman, J.W. (2012, January). Stars, stripes and the symbolic divide: Regional differences in responses to national symbols. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
    • Cohrs, J.C. et al. (2004). Ist patriotischer Nationalstolz wünschenswert? (Is patriotic national pride desireable?) Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 35, 201-215.
    • Cumming-Bruce, N., & Erlanger, S. (2009, November 29). Swiss ban building of minarets on mosques. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
    • Ferguson, M. J., & Hassin, R. R. (2007). On the automatic association between America and aggression for news watchers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1632- 1647.
    • Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias a classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 35, 263-282.
    • Fozdar, F., Spittles, B., & Hartley, L. (2014). Australia Day, flags on cars and Australian nationalism. Journal of Sociology, 1, 2-20.
    • Geisler, M. E. (2005). What are national symbols-and what do they do to us? In M. E. Geisler (Ed.), National symbols, fractured identities (pp. xiii-xlii). Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Press.
    • Hassin, R. R., Ferguson, M. J., Shidlovski, D., & Gross, T. (2007). Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19757-19761.
    • Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
    • Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D.G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29, 859-879.
    • Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257-273.
    • Leung, K., Koch, P. T., & Lu, L. (2002). A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 201-220.
    • Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229.
    • New Zealand Elections (2016, August 24). Second Referendum on the New Zealand Flag Final Result. Retrieved from http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/2016_flag_referendum2/
    • Nolan, P., Bryan, D., Dwyer, C., Hayward, K., Radford, K. & Shirlow, P. (2014). The flag dispute: Anatomy of a protest. Queen's University Belfast.
    • O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 32(3), 396-402.
    • Ortmann, S. (2011). Singapore: Authoritarian but newly competitive. Journal of Democracy, 22, 153-164.
    • Phillips, T., & Smith, P. (2000). What is 'Australian'? Knowledge and among a gallery of contemporary Australians. Australian Journal of Political Science, 35, 203-224.
    • Q&A: Northern Ireland flag protests (2014, November 28). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com
    • Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2000). Self and nation. London: Sage.
    • Schatz, R. T., & Lavine, H. (2007). Waving the flag: National symbolism, social identity, and political engagement. Political Psychology, 28, 329-355.
    • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48, 23-47.
    • Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences. In C.Y. Chiu, Y. Y. Hong, S. Shavitt, & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 127-150). New York: Psychology Press.
    • Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2007). New Zealand= bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1222-1243.
    • Sibley, C. G., Hoverd, W., & Duckitt, J. (2011). What's in a flag? Subliminal exposure to New Zealand national symbols and the automatic activation of egalitarian versus dominance values. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 494-516.
    • Skitka, L. J. (2005). Patriotism or nationalism? Understanding post-September 11, 2001, flagdisplay behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1995-2011.
    • Smith, T. W. (2005). Civic nationalism and ethnocultural justice in Turkey. Human Rights Quarterly, 27, 436-470.
    • Smith, T. W., & Kim, S. (2006). National pride in comparative perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 127-136.
    • Soroka, S., & Roberton, S. (2010). A literature review of public opinion research on Canadian attitudes towards multiculturalism and immigration, 2006-2009. Retrieved from http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/research-stats/2012-por-multi-imm-eng.pdf
    • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33, 74.
    • Victoria school (2014). National flag. Retrieved via http://vs.moe.edu.sg/national_symbol.htm
    • Virmani, A. (2008). A national flag for India. Rituals, nationalism and the politics of sentiment. Delhi: Permanent Black.
    • Wagner, U., Becker, J. C., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., & Schmidt, P. (2010). A longitudinal test of the relation between German nationalism, patriotism, and outgroup derogation. European Sociological Review, 28, 319-338.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article