LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hughes, Kathryn
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: H1
The psychological aspects of propensity to offend are considered. The relationship between attitude,\ud personality, and reported offending is explored. Some literature considers how attitude influences\ud offending; others look at the relationship between personality and offending. The present thesis\ud proposes that there is a complex relationship between all three.\ud The Attitude to Offending Style Scale measures preferences towards hypothetical offending styles.\ud Shultzs’ FIRO-B explores the structure of interpersonal personality. Finally, an adaptation of Youngs’\ud D42 (D45) explores styles and level of reported offending. 254 members of the general public\ud complete each of these self-report scales.\ud An SSA-I tests the construct validity and structure of the scales stated above. Multiple regression\ud analyses explore the relationship between attitude and personality, and how these influence level of\ud reported offending. The moderating role of interpersonal personality is also considered.\ud The findings reveal that Attitudes are categorized as: Instrumental or Expressive high risk, and Low\ud risk. Shultzs’ FIRO-B scale has four facets: Expressed Inclusion Expressed Control, Received Inclusion\ud and Received Control. Finally, reported offending is categorised as More or Less serious,\ud Instrumental or Expressive, and target Person or Property. Results show that variations in attitude\ud and personality styles are related to level of reported offending.\ud Furthermore, it was found that the relationship between attitude and level of reported offending is\ud moderated by level of ‘Received Control’. More specifically, when an individual shows a positive\ud attitude towards Instrumental high risk crimes and feel ‘controlled by others’, their level of reported\ud offending is also likely to be high.\ud The presented research shows the value of considering attitudes towards offending, the moderating\ud role of interpersonal personality, and how this relates to level of reported offending. The methods\ud employed throughout the thesis demonstrate the strength and validity of self-report measures.\ud Results are applicable to many areas, including direction and methods in future research. The\ud findings can be applied to areas such as rehabilitation, interview techniques and preventative\ud measures.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Sullivan, C. J., Mc Gloin, J. M., Ray, J. V. & Caudy, M. S. (2009). Detecting specialisation in offending: Comparing analytic approaches. Quantitative criminology. 25: 419-441.
    • Sullivan, C. J., Mc Gloin, M., Pratt, T. C., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Rethinking the “norm” of offender generality: Investigating specialization in the short term. Criminology. 44(1): 199-233.
    • Sutherland, E. H. (1940). White collar criminality. American sociological review. 5(1): 1-12.
    • Sutherland, E.H. (1939). Principles of Criminology. (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lipincott.
    • Sutherland, J. P. (1974). Multiple stable points in natural communities. American Naturalist 108:859- 873.
    • Sykes G and Matza D (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review. 22(6): 664-670.
    • Tajfel, H. (1978). Inter individual and intergroup behaviour. In Tajfel, H. Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp27-60). London: Academic Press.
    • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    • Thompson, H. (1998). Using the FIRO-B and the MBTI. Bulletin of Psychological Type. 21(4):18-20.
    • Thurman, Q. C. (1984). Deviance and the neutralization of moral commitment: An empirical analysis. Deviant behaviour. 5: 291-304.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article