Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dallimer, M.; Davies, Z.G.; Diaz-Porras, D.F.; Irvine, K.N.; Maltby, L.; Warren, P.H.; Armsworth, P.R.; Gaston, K.J. (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Global Environmental Change
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QH75, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geography, Planning and Development
Ecosystem service provision varies temporally in response to natural and human-induced factors, yet research in this field is dominated by analyses that ignore the time-lags and feedbacks that occur within socio-ecological systems. The implications of this have been unstudied, but are central to understanding how service delivery will alter due to future land-use/cover change. Urban areas are expanding faster than any other land-use, making cities ideal study systems for examining such legacy effects. We assess the extent to which present-day provision of a suite of eight ecosystem services, quantified using field-gathered data, is explained by current and historical (stretching back 150 years) landcover. Five services (above-ground carbon density, recreational use, bird species richness, bird density, and a metric of recreation experience quality (continuity with the past) were more strongly determined by past landcover. Time-lags ranged from 20 (bird species richness and density) to over 100 years (above-ground carbon density). Historical landcover, therefore, can have a strong influence on current service provision. By ignoring such time-lags, we risk drawing incorrect conclusions regarding how the distribution and quality of some ecosystem services may alter in response to land-use/cover change. Although such a finding adds to the complexity of predicting future scenarios, ecologists may find that they can link the biodiversity conservation agenda to the preservation of cultural heritage, and that certain courses of action provide win-win outcomes across multiple environmental and cultural goods.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abercrombie, P., 1924. Sheffield: A Civic Survey and Suggestions Towards a Development Plan. University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
    • Altman, I., Low, S.M., 1992. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Plenum Press, New York.
    • Armsworth, P.R., Cantu´ -Salazar, L., Parnell, M., Booth, J.E., Stoneman, R., Davies, Z.G., 2013. Opportunities for cost-sharing in conservation: variation in volunteering effort across protected areas. PLoS ONE 8, e55395.
    • Ashworth, G., 2008. In search of the Place-identity Dividend: Using Heritage Landscapes to Create Place Identity. In: Eyles, J., Williams, A. (Eds.), Sense of Place, Health and Quality of Life. , Ashgate books. http://www.ashgate.com/isbn/ 9780754673323.
    • Austin, M.P., Heyligers, P.C., 1989. Vegetation survey design for conservation: Gradsect sampling of forests in north-eastern New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50, 13.
    • Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A.B., Buchmann, N., He, J.S., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146-1156.
    • Barau, A., Ludin, A.N.M., Said, I., 2013. Socio-ecological systems and biodiversity conservation in African city: insights from Kano Emir's palace gardens. Urban Ecosyst. 16, 783-800.
    • Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., Kaplan, S., 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1207-1212.
    • Bonnes, M., Secchiaroli, G., 1995. Environmental Psychology: A Psycho-social Introduction. Sage Publications, London.
    • Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., Knight, T.M., Pullin, A.S., 2010. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10, 456.
    • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York.
    • Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R.S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings,C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 1305-1312.
    • Chan, K.M.A., Shaw, M.R., Cameron, D.R., Underwood, E.C., Daily, G.C., 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 4, 2138-2152.
    • Crawley, M.J., 2007. The R book. Wiley, Oxford.
    • Crossley, D., Cass, J., 1989. Water Power on the Sheffield Rivers. Sheffield Trades Historical Association and University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
    • Dallimer, M., Davies, Z., Irvine, K., Maltby, L., Warren, P., Gaston, K., Armsworth, P., 2014. What personal and environmental factors determine frequency of urban greenspace use? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 7977-7992.
    • Dallimer, M., Irvine, K.N., Skinner, A.M.J., Davies, Z.G., Rouquette, J.R., Maltby, L.L., Warren, P.H., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., 2012a. Biodiversity and the feelgood factor: understanding associations between self-reported human wellbeing and species richness. Bioscience 62, 47-55.
    • Dallimer, M., Marini, L., Skinner, A.M.J., Hanley, N., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., 2010. Agricultural land-use in the surrounding landscape affects moorland bird diversity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 139, 578-583.
    • Dallimer, M., Rouquette, J.R., Skinner, A.M.J., Armsworth, P.R., Maltby, L.M., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J., 2012b. Contrasting patterns in species richness of birds, butterflies and plants along riparian corridors in an urban landscape. Divers. Distrib. 18, 742-753.
    • Dallimer, M., Tang, Z.Y., Bibby, P.R., Brindley, P., Gaston, K.J., Davies, Z.G., 2011. Temporal changes in greenspace in a highly urbanized region. Biol. Lett. 7, 763-766.
    • Davies, Z.G., Edmondson, J.L., Heinemeyer, A., Leake, J.R., Gaston, K.J., 2011. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a citywide scale. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1125-1134.
    • Dearing, J.A., Yang, X.D., Dong, X.H., Zhang, E.L., Chen, X., Langdon, P.G., Zhang, K., Zhang, W.G., Dawson, T.P., 2012. Extending the timescale and range of ecosystem services through paleoenvironmental analyses, exemplified in the lower Yangtze basin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, E1111-E1120.
    • di Castri, F., Hadley, M., Damlamian, J., 1981. MAB-The Man and Biosphere Program as an evolving system. Ambio 10, 52-57.
    • Dı´az Porras, D.F., 2013. Historical Urban Ecology, Green Spaces, and Biodiversity. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
    • EEA, 2009. Ensuring Quality of Life in Europe's Cities and Towns. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J., 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 377-385.
    • Eriksson, O., 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77, 248-258.
    • Firth, C., 1997. Domesday to the Dawn of the New Millennium: 900 Years of the Don Fishery. Environment Agency, Bristol.
    • Ford, H.A., Walters, J.R., Cooper, C.B., Debus, S.J.S., Doerr, V.A.J., 2009. Extinction debt or habitat change?-ongoing losses of woodland birds in north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 142, 3182-3190.
    • Foster, D., Swanson, F., Aber, J., Burke, I., Brokaw, N., Tilman, D., Knapp, A., 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53, 77-88.
    • Goddard, M.A., Dougill, A.J., Benton, T.G., 2010. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 90-98.
    • Gomez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N., 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235-245.
    • Gough, C.M., Vogel, C.S., Harrold, K.H., George, K., Curtis, P.S., 2007. The legacy of harvest and fire on ecosystem carbon storage in a north temperate forest. Global Change Biol. 13, 1935-1949.
    • Griffiths, P., 1999. The Five Weirs Walk. Hallamshire Publications Ltd, Sheffield.
    • Gulwadi, G.B., 2006. Seeking restorative experiences-elementary school teachers' choices for places that enable coping with stress. Environ. Behav. 38, 503-520.
    • Gu¨ neralp, B., McDonald, R., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Marcotullio, P., Seto, K., 2013. Urbanization forecasts, effects on land use, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Gu¨ neralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C. (Eds.), Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 437-452.
    • Gustavsson, E., Lennartsson, T., Emanuelsson, M., 2007. Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape. Biol. Conserv. 138, 47-59.
    • Herzog, T.R., Black, A.M., Fountaine, K.A., Knotts, D.J., 1997. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 17, 165-170.
    • Hey, D., 2005. A History of Sheffield. Carnegie Publishing Ltd, Lancaster.
    • Holland, R.A., Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J., 2011. The influence of temporal variation on relationships between ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 3285-3294.
    • Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W.X., Fagan, W.F., Redman, C.L., Grimm, N.B., Nelson, A.L., Martin, C., Kinzig, A., 2003. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 8788-8792.
    • Hull, R.B., Lam, M., Vigo, G., 1994. Place identity-symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landsc. Urban Plann. 28, 109-120.
    • Irvine, K.N., Warber, S.L., Devine-Wright, P., Gaston, K.J., 2013. Understanding urban green space as a health resource: a qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in Sheffield, UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 417-442.
    • Ittelson, W.H., Rivlin, A., Winkel, G., 1974. An Introduction to Environmental Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
    • Jenks, M., Jones, C., 2010. Dimensions of the Sustainable City. Springer, New York.
    • Jiang, M., Bullock, J.M., Hooftman, D.A.P., 2013. Mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70 years in a rural English county. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 841-850.
    • Kamp, J., Urazaliev, R., Donald, P.F., Holzel, N., 2011. Post-Soviet agricultural change predicts future declines after recent recovery in Eurasian steppe bird populations. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2607-2614.
    • Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: a Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York.
    • Kaplan, S., 1993. The role of natural environment aesthetics in the restorative experience. In: Gobster, P.H. (Ed.), Managing Urban and High-use Recreation Settings, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, , pp. 46-49, General Technical Report NC-163.
    • Kaplan, S., 1995. The restorative benefits of nature-toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15, 169-182.
    • Kareiva, P., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., 2011. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Kendall, K., 2005. Walking the Rivelin. Rivelin Valley Conservation Group, Sheffield.
    • Keniger, L.E., Gaston, K.J., Irvine, K.N., Fuller, R.A., 2013. What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 913-935.
    • Kuo, F.E., Sullivan, W.C., 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city - Does vegetation reduce crime? Environ. Behav. 33, 343-367.
    • Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R.K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Lindborg, R., Ockinger, E., Partel, M., Pino, J., Roda, F., Stefanescu, C., Teder, T., Zobel, M., Steffan-Dewenter, I., 2009. Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 564-571.
    • Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., Seppelt, R., 2011. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 11, 676-687.
    • Liu, J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlicht, P.R., Luck, G.W., 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421, 530-533.
    • Luck, G.W., Smallbone, L.T., O'Brien, R., 2009. Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12, 604-620.
    • Mace, G.M., Norris, K., Fitter, A.H., 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19-26.
    • Manes, F., Incerti, G., Salvatori, E., Vitale, M., Ricotta, C., Costanza, R., 2012. Urban ecosystem services: tree diversity and stability of tropospheric ozone removal. Ecol. Appl. 22, 349-360.
    • Manzo, L.C., 2003. Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. J. Environ. Psychol. 23, 47-61.
    • Manzo, L.C., 2005. For better or worse: exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 67-86.
    • McDonald, R.I., Forman, R.T.T., Kareiva, P., 2010. Open space loss and land inequality in United States'' cities, 1990-2000. PLoS ONE 5 .
    • MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
    • Meine, C., 1999. It's about time: conservation biology and history. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1-3.
    • Mitchell, R., Popham, F., 2007. Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61, 681-683.
    • Myint, S.W., Wentz, E.A., Brazel, A.J., Quattrochi, D.A., 2013. The impact of distinct anthropogenic and vegetation features on urban warming. Landsc. Ecol. 28, 959-978.
    • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 9495-9500.
    • Nassauer, J.I., 1997. Cultural sustainability: aligning aesthetics and ecology. In: Nassauer, J.I. (Ed.), Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 65-83.
    • Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D.R., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G.C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T.H., Shaw, M.R., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 4-11.
    • Newell, B., Crumley, C.L., Hassan, N., Lambin, E.F., Pahl-Wostl, C., Underdal, A., Wasson, R., 2005. A conceptual template for integrative human-environment research. Glob. Environ. Change-Hum. Policy Dimens. 15, 299-307.
    • Nicholson, E., Mace, G.M., Armsworth, P.R., Atkinson, G., Buckle, S., Clements, T., Ewers, R.M., Fa, J.E., Gardner, T.A., Gibbons, J., Grenyer, R., Metcalfe, R., Mourato, S., Muuls, M., Osborn, D., Reuman, D.C., Watson, C., Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2009. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1139-1144.
    • Nowak, D.J., Greenfield, E.J., 2012. Tree and impervious cover change in US cities. Urban Forest. Urban Green. 11, 21-30.
    • O'Brien, L., 2004. A Sort of Magical Place: People's Experiences of Woodlands in Northwest and Southeast England. Forest Research, Edinburgh.
    • ODPM, 2003. Living Places: Cleaner, Safer, Greener. Stationery Office, London.
    • ONS, 2012a. 2011 Census-Population and Household Estimates for England and Wales, March 2011. Office for National Statistics, London.
    • ONS, 2012b. Families and Households 2001 to 2011. Office for National Statistics, London.
    • Park, M., Hagishima, A., Tanimoto, J., Narita, K., 2012. Effect of urban vegetation on outdoor thermal environment: field measurement at a scale model site. Build. Environ. 56, 38-46.
    • Pa¨ rtel, M., Mandla, R., Zobel, M., 1999. Landscape history of a calcareous (alvar) grassland in Hanila, western Estonia, during the last three hundred years. Landsc. Ecol. 14, 187-196.
    • Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Groffman, P.M., Band, L.E., Boone, C.G., Burch, W.R., Grimmond, C.S.B., Hom, J., Jenkins, J.C., Law, N.L., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Szlavecz, K., Warren, P.S., Wilson, M.A., 2008. Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Bioscience 58, 139-150.
    • Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K., Kaminoff, R., 1983. Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. J. Environ. Psychol. 3, 57-83.
    • Pugh, T.A.M., MacKenzie, A.R., Whyatt, J.D., Hewitt, C.N., 2012. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 7692-7699.
    • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Bennett, E.M., 2010a. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 5242-5247.
    • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Tengo, M., Bennett, E.M., Holland, T., Benessaiah, K., MacDonald, G.K., Pfeifer, L., 2010b. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60, 576-589.
    • Rouquette, J.R., Dallimer, M., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., Maltby, L., Warren, P.H., 2013. Species turnover and geographic distance in an urban river network. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1429-1439.
    • Scannell, L., Gifford, R., 2010. Defining place attachment: a tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 1-10.
    • Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S., 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 630-636.
    • Seto, K.C., Gu¨ neralp, B., Hutyra, L.R., 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 16083-16088.
    • Staats, H., Kieviet, A., Hartig, T., 2003. Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J. Environ. Psychol. 23, 147-157.
    • Stedman, R.C., 2003. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16, 671-685.
    • Sullivan, W.C., Kuo, F.E., DePooter, S.F., 2004. The fruit of urban nature - Vital neighborhood spaces. Environ. Behav. 36, 678-700.
    • Susca, T., Gaffin, S.R., Dell'Osso, G.R., 2011. Positive effects of vegetation: urban heat island and green roofs. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2119-2126.
    • Szabo, P., 2010. Why history matters in ecology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Environ. Conserv. 37, 380-387.
    • Szabo, P., Hedl, R., 2011. Advancing the integration of history and ecology for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 25, 680-687.
    • Talbot, J.F., Kaplan, R., 1984. Needs and fears: the response to trees and nature in the inner city. J. Arboricult. 10, 222-228.
    • Thomas, L., Buckland, S.T., Rexstad, E.A., Laake, J.L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S.L., Bishop, J.R.B., Marques, T.A., Burnham, K.P., 2010. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 5-14.
    • Tianhong, L., Wenkai, L., Zhenghan, Q., 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1427-1435.
    • Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L., Nowak, M.A., 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65-66.
    • Timothy, D.J., Nyaupane, G.P., 2009. Cultural Heritage and Tourism in the Developing World: A Regional Perspective. Routledge.
    • Troy, A.R., Grove, J.M., O'Neil-Dunne, J.P.M., Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., 2007. Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environ. Manage. 40, 394-412.
    • Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A., Niemela, J., James, P., 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plann. 81, 167-178.
    • UKNEA, 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. UNEPWCMC, Cambridge.
    • United Nations, 2013. World Urbanization Prospects, the 2012 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York.
    • Ward-Thompson, C., Roe, J., Aspinall, P., Mitchell, R., Clow, A., Miller, D., 2012. More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105, 221-229.
    • Watson, S.J., Luck, G.W., Spooner, P.G., Watson, D.M., 2014. Land-use change: incorporating the frequency, sequence, time span, and magnitude of changes into ecological research. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 241-249.
    • Zhao, S.Q., Da, L.J., Tang, Z.Y., Fang, H.J., Song, K., Fang, J.Y., 2006. Ecological consequences of rapid urban expansion: Shanghai, China. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 341-346.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | URSULA: Urban River Corrid...

Cite this article