Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Habgood, M P Jacob; Ainsworth, Shaaron; Benford, Steve (2005)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown

Classified by OpenAIRE into

The concept of intrinsic fantasy has been considered central to the aim of usefully applying the positive affect of computer games to learning. Games with intrinsic fantasy are defined as having “an integral and continuing relationship with the instructional content being presented”, and are claimed as “more interesting and more educational” than extrinsic fantasy games [1]. Studies of children making educational games have shown they usually create extrinsic games for curriculum learning content. In this study, children were encouraged to create non-curriculum games, more easily distanced from the extrinsic preconceptions of formal schooling. Forty, 7-11 year olds took part in this study (17 boys and 23 girls), designing and making their own games at an after-school club. Despite non-curriculum learning content, no more intrinsic games were created than in previous studies. The children failed to create their own pedagogical models for non-curriculum content and did not see the educational value of intrinsic fantasy games. The implications for transfer and learning in intrinsic games are discussed whilst the definition of intrinsic fantasy itself is questioned. It is argued that the integral relationship of fantasy is unlikely to be the most critical means of improving the educational effectiveness of digital games.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] Malone, T.W., Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction. Cognitive Science, 1981.
    • 5(4): p. 333-369.
    • Malone, T.W. What Makes Things Fun to Learn? Heuristics for Designing Instructional Computer Games. in Association for Computing Machinery Symposium on Small and Personal Computer Systems. 1980. Pal Alto, California.
    • Malone, T.W., What Makes Computer Games Fun? BYTE, 1981. 5: p. 258-277.
    • Malone, T.W., Guidelines for Designing Educational Computer Programs. Childhood Education, 1983. 59(4): p. 241-247.
    • Malone, T.W., What Makes Computer Games Fun? Guidelines for Designing Educational Computer Programs, in Intelligent Schoolhouse, D. Peterson, Editor. 1984, Reston Publishing Company: Resten, VA. p. 78-92.
    • Lepper, M.R. and T.W. Malone, Intrinsic Motivation and Instructional Effectiveness in ComputerBased Education, in Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses, R.E. Snow and M.J. Farr, Editors. 1987, Erlbaum: Hilsdale, NJ. p. 255-286.
    • Snow and M.J. Farr, Editors. 1987, Erlbaum: Hilsdale, NJ. p. 223-253.
    • Kafai, Y.B., Minds in Play. 1995, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal, 1998. 1(1).
    • Gilmore, D.J., et al., Learning graphical programming: An evaluation of KidSim. 1996: Nottingham, UK.
    • Smith, D.C., A. Cypher, and L. Tesler, Novice Programming Comes of Age. Communications of the ACM, 2000. 43(3): p. 75-81.
    • Salen, K. and E. Zimmerman, Rules of Play. 2004, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article