Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Qazizada, Walid; Stockhammer, Engelbert (2014)
Publisher: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University
Languages: English
Types: Preprint
Subjects: economics, Fiscal multiplier, fiscal policy, panel analysis, output contraction, Fiscal multiplier; fiscal policy; panel analysis; output contraction
jel: jel:E62, jel:C36
This paper investigates the impact of government spending on output and the size of the spending multiplier during periods of output contraction vs. expansion. It also investigates the impact of spending when the economy hits the nominal zero lower bound. It uses a panel of 21 advanced countries over the period of 1979-2011, applying a TSLS estimation technique. We find a spending multiplier of close to 1 during expansion and values of up to 3 during contractions. However, our results do not indicate a difference in the impact of spending during nominal zero lower bound periods.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 5 The countries are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States.
    • Acconcia, A., Corsetti, G. and Simonelli, S. (2011) 'Mafia and public spending: evidence on the fiscal multiplier from a quasi-experiment', CEPR Discussion paper No. 8305 Afonso, A, Gruner, H, & Kolerus, C 2010, 'Fiscal policy and growth: do financial crises make a difference?', ECB Working Paper No. 1217 Afonso, A. and Alegre, J. G. (2011) 'Economic growth and budgetary components: a panel assessment for the EU', Empirical Economics, 41 (3), pp. 703-723.
    • Afonso, A. and Furceri, D. (2010) 'Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth', European Journal of Political Economy, 26 (4), pp. 517-532.
    • Afonso, A. And Jalles, J. (2013) 'The cyclicality of education, health, and social security government spending', Applied Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, 20 (7) pp. 669-672 Antonio, A. and Ricardo, M. S. (2012) 'The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy', Applied Economics, 44 (34- 36), pp. 4439-4454.
    • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) 'Tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations', The Review of Economic Studies, 85 (2), pp. 277-297 Auerbach, A, and Gorodnichenko, Y., (2012) 'Fiscal Multipliers in Recession and Expansion', in Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis, edited by Alberto Alesina and Francesco Giavazzi (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
    • Balli, H. and Sorensen, B. (2013) 'Interaction effects in econometrics', Empirical Economics, 45, pp.583-603 Baltagi, B. (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data. 3rd edn. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    • Barro, R (1989a) 'The Ricardian approach to budget deficit', The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (2), pp. 37-54 Barro, R. (1989b) 'New Classicals and Keynesians, or the Good Guys and the Bad Guys', NBER Working Papers 2982, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Bass, F. (1975) 'Pooling issues and methods in regression analysis with examples in marketing research', Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (4), pp. 414-425 Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S.(1999) 'The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework', in Taylor, J. B. & Woodford, M. (eds.) Handbook of macroeconomics. The US: Elsevier Science B.V, pp. 1342-1390 Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002) 'An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (4), pp. 1329- 1368.
    • Blanchard, Olivier, Leigh, Daniel, 2013. Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers. International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP13/1 Blyth, M,. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press Bouakez, H., F. Chihi and Normandin, M. (2010). Measuring the effects of fiscal policy. Centre Interuniversitaire sur le Risque, les Politiques Économiques et l'Emploi, Working Paper 10-16.
    • Bouthevillain. C. et al (2009): Pros and cons of various fiscal measures to stimulate the economy, Banque Central de Luxembourg Working Paper 40 Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2004) 'Political budget cycle in new versus established democracies', NBER Working Paper No. 10539 Burnside, C. Eichenbaum, M., and Fisher, J. (2004). 'Fiscal shocks and their consequences.' Journal of Economic theory, 115 (1), pp.89-117.
    • Burriel, P., de Castro, F., Garrote, D., Gordo, E., Paredes, J. and Perez, J. J. (2010) 'Fiscal policy shocks in the euro area and the US: an empirical assessment', Fiscal Studies, 31 (2), pp. 251-285.
    • Christiano et al. (2011)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article