LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gunn, Vicky (2014)
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Journal: Humanities
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: collective memory, research-teaching linkages, History of scholarship and learning. The humanities, Humanities, AZ20-999, graduate attributes, qualitative research
Identifiers:doi:10.3390/h3030264
The ways in which Humanities scholars talk about teaching tell something about how we interact with the past of our own discipline as well as anticipate our students’ futures. In this we express collective memories as truths of learning and teaching. As cultural artifacts of our present, such stories are worthy of excavation for what they imply about ourselves as well as messages they pass onto our successors. This paper outlines “collective re-membering” as one way to understand these stories, particularly as they present in qualitative interviews commonly being used to research higher education practice in the Humanities. It defines such collective re-membering through an interweaving of Halbwachs, Ricoeur, Wertsch and Bakhtin. It proposes that a dialogic reading between this understanding of collective re-membering and qualitative data-sets enables us to both access our discursive tendencies within the Humanities and understand the impact they might have on student engagement with our disciplines, noting that when discussing learning and teaching, we engage in collectively influenced myth-making and hagiography. The paper finishes by positing that the Humanities need to change their orientation from generating myths and pious teaching sagas towards the complex and ultimately more intellectually satisfying, articulation of learning and teaching parables.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Stefan Collini. What Are Universities for? London: Penguin, 2012.
    • 2. Sally Munt. Heroic Desires: Lesbian Identity and Cultural Space. London: Cassell, 1998.
    • 3. Leonard Webster, and Patricie Mertova. Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis on Teaching and Learning. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2007.
    • 4. Mikhail Epstein. The Transformative Humanities: A Manifesto. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
    • 5. Martha Nussbaum. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    • 6. Elizabeth Bullen, Simon Robb, and Jane Kenway. “'Creative destruction': Knowledge economic policy and the future of the arts and Humanities in the academy.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (2004): 3-22.
    • 7. John Russo. The Future without a Past: The Humanities in a Technological Society. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2005.
    • 8. Helen Small. The Value of the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    • 9. Celia Chazelle, Simon Doubleday, Felice Lifshitz, and Amy Remensnyder. Why the Middle Ages Matter Medieval Light on Modern Injustice. London: Routledge, 2012.
    • 10. Isabel Gil. “Monks, Managers and Celebrities: Refiguring the European university.” In Making the University Matter. Edited by Barbie Zelizer. London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 73-83.
    • 11. Richard Sennett. The Craftsman. London: Penguin, 2009.
    • 12. Vicky Gunn. “Constraints to implementing Learning Partnership Models and Self-Authorship in the Arts and Humanities.” In The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries. Edited by Carolin Kreber. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009, pp. 169-78.
    • 13. Vicky Gunn. “Arts & Humanities' Undergraduate Dissertations: Regenerating Early Researcher Socialization for Diverse Futures (UK Perspectives).” In Supervising and Writing a Good Undergraduate Dissertation. Edited by Roisin Donnelly, John Dallat and Marian Fitzmaurice. Bussum, Netherlands: Bentham Science Publishers, 2013, pp. 149-86 [e-book].
    • 14. Vicky Gunn, Steve Draper, and Mel McKendrick. Research-Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Glasgow: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (Scotland), 2008. Available online: http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/publications/enhancing-graduate-attributes-artsHumanities-and-social-sciences.pdf?sfvrsn=14 (accessed on 10 June 2014).
    • 15. Vicky Gunn, and Jamie Wightwick. “Final Report of the Graduate Attributes Working Group.” University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 2010. Available online: http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/ media_218773_en.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2014).
    • 16. Maurice Halbwachs. The Collective Memory. Translated by Francis Ditter and Vida Ditter. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1980.
    • 17. Maurice Halbwachs. On Collective Memory. Edited and translated by Lewis Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
    • 18. Paul Ricoeur. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
    • 19. James Wertsch. Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    • 20. Mikhail Bakhtin. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.
    • 21. James Wertsch. “Collective Memory.” In Memory and Mind in Culture. Edited by Pascal Boyer and James Wertsch. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 117-37.
    • 22. Jan Schapper, and Susan Mayson. “Research-led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience.” Higher Education Research and Development 29 (2010): 641-51.
    • 23. Gerda Visser-Wijnween. The Research-Teaching Nexus in the Humanities: Variations among Academics. Leiden: Mostert & Van Onderen, 2009.
    • 24. Alastair Ager, and Maryanne Loughry. “Psychology and humanitarian assistance.” The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance, 1 April 2004. Available online: http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/80 (accessed on 10 June 2014).
    • 25. Anne Jones. “Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context.” Higher Education 58 (2009): 175-91.
    • 26. Catherine Scott, and Steve Dinham. “Born not made: The nativist myth and teachers' thinking.” Teacher Development 12 (2008): 115-24.
    • 27. Torgni Roxä, and Katarina Märtensson. “Significant conversations and significant networksExploring the backstage teaching arena.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (2009): 547-59.
    • 28. Torgni Roxä, Katarina Märtensson, and Matthias Alveteg. “Understanding & influencing teaching and learning cultures at university: A network approach.” Higher Education 62 (2011): 99-111.
    • 29. Paul Connerton. How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    • 30. Farhat Shahzad. “Collective Memories: A complex construction.” Memory Studies 5 (2011): 378-91.
    • 31. Pascal Boyer, and James Wertsch, eds. Memory and Mind in Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    • 32. Harald Welzer. “Re-narration: How pasts change in conversational remembering.” Memory Studies 3 (2010): 5-17.
    • 33. Roger Simon. The Touch of the Past: Remembrance, Learning, and Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
    • 34. Dominique Maingueneau. “Analysis of an Academic Genre.” Discourse Studies 4 (2002): 319-42.
    • 35. Julie Hengst, and Peggy Miller. “The heterogeneity of discourse genres: Implications for Development.” World Englishes 18 (1999): 325-42.
    • 36. Dominique Maingueneau. “Literature and discourse analysis.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42 (2010): 147-58.
    • 37. Ken Hyland. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum, 2009.
    • 38. Vicky Gunn. “Mimetic desire and intersubjectivity in disciplinary cultures: Constraints or enablers to learning in higher education?” Studies in Continuing Education 36 (2014): 67-82.
    • 39. Tatiana Yarkova, and Aleh Cherp. “Managing the sacred? Perspectives on teaching excellence and learning outcomes from an international postgraduate university.” European Journal of Higher Education 3 (2013): 24-39.
    • 40. Hans Georg Gadamer. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.
    • 41. Cath Lambert, Andrew Parker, and Mike Neary. “Entrepreneurialism and critical pedagogy: Reinventing the Higher Education Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (2007): 525-37.
    • 42. David Watson. The Question of Morale: Managing Happiness and Unhappiness in University Life. London: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
    • 43. Catherine Cubbitt. “Images of Saint Peter: The Clergy and the Religious Life in Anglo-Saxon England.” In The Christian Tradition in Anglo-Saxon England: Approaches to Current Scholarship and Teaching. Edited by Paul Cavill. Cambridge, UK: Brewer, 2004, pp. 41-54.
    • 44. Jan Parker. “Humanities Higher Education: New Models, New Challenges.” In Contemporary Themes in Humanities in Higher Education. Edited by Ellie Chambers. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, pp. 21-43.
    • 45. Mary Henkel. “Teaching and Research: The Idea of a Nexus.” Higher Education Management and Policy 16 (2004): 19-31.
    • 46. Ben Knights. “Intelligence and Interrogation: The identity of the English student.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 4 (2005): 43-61.
    • 47. Joshua Guetzkow, Michèle Lamont, and Grégoire Mallard. “What is Originality in the Humanities and Social Sciences?” American Sociological Review 69 (2004): 190-212.
    • 48. Steve Draper, University of Glasgow, personal communication, 2013.
    • 49. Jessica Benjamin. “Beyond the Doer and Done to: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 73 (2004): 5-46.
    • 50. Barbara Schapiro. “Negotiating a Third Space in the Classroom.” Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture 9 (2009): 423-39.
    • 51. Robert Bullough. “Parables, Storytelling, and Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (2010): 153-60. Available online: http://jte.sagepub.com/content/61/1-2/153.full.pdf+html (accessed on 10 June 2014).
    • 52. Herbert Anderson, and Edward Foley. Mighty Stories, Dangerous Rituals: Weaving together the Human and the Divine. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
    • 53. Wouter Henkelman, Amélie Kuhrt, Robert Rollinger, and Josef Wiesehöfer. “Herodotus and Babylon Reconsidered.” In Herodot und das Persische Weltreich. Herodotus and the Persian Empire (Classica et Orientalia CLeO Band 3). Edited by Robert Rollinger, Brigitte Truschnegg and Reinhold Bichler. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011, pp. 449-70.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.