LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fulda, Andreas; Li, Yanyan; Song, Qinghua (2012)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Since the turn of the millennium a second generation of Chinese civil society organisations (CSO) have started taking on issues such as rural migrant integration, social service provision, as well as community building. Organisations such as Beijing-based Shining Stone Community Action (SSCA) can be seen as the avant-garde of a second wave of humanistic, community-based CSO which are willing to help improve the strained state-society relationship in the People´s Republic of China (PR China). In order to advance their values and interests civil society practitioners are willing to engage with Chinese government officials. By gaining the trust of First-in-Command (FIC) cadres they manage to introduce ideas such as the principle of subsidiarity, solidarity and reciprocity. Civil society practitioners thereby initiate open-ended processes of communication, consultation and cooperation. Such processes help promote cross-sector collaboration between Chinese civil society organisations and local government agencies. These developments signify an incremental change from government control (guanzhi) to public management (guanli) and to network governance (zhili). As a framework for the case study the authors look at strategies for the establishment of cooperative relations, focusing on steering mechanisms and process factors. In order to further understand the dynamics of cross-sector collaboration they further explore the social capital dimensions of the principle of reciprocity and trust. To evaluate outcomes and impacts of cross-sector collaboration, the authors discuss the ability of collaboration partners to produce tangible results and to innovate. The findings show that successful experiments with cross-sector collaboration not only depend on structural factors but also on the skills and strategies of the individuals and organisations involved.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alinsky, Saul. Rules for Radicals. A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books, 1971
    • Agranoff, Robert. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review. Special Issue (2006): 56-65.
    • Arnstein, Sherry. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association. 35, no. 4 (1969): 216-224.
    • Bryson, John M.. “Why Strategic Planning in Public and Nonprofit Organizations is More Important Than Ever” in Introduction to Public Administration. A Book of Readings, edited by J. Steven Ott and E.W. Russell. 314-323. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2006.
    • 56 Joseph Fewsmith, Elite Politics in Contemporary China (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc, 2001).
    • Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby and Melissa Middleton Stone. “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.” Public Administration Review, Special Issue (2006): 44-55.
    • Cooperrider, David L. and Diana Whitney, Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2005.
    • Diamond, Larry. Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc, 1994.
    • Derleth, James and Daniel R. Koldyk. “The Shequ Experiment: grassroots political reform in urban China.” Journal of Contemporary China 41, no. 13 (2004): 747-777.
    • Etzioni, Amitai. “Mixed Scanning: A 'Third' Approach to Decision Making”, in Classics of Public Policy, edited by Jay M. Shafritz, Karen S. Layne, and Christopher P. Borick. 42-46. Beijing: Pearson Education Asia Limited and Peking University Press, 2006.
    • Etzioni, Amitai, Andrew Volmert and Elanit Rothschild. The Communitarian Reader. Beyond the Essentials. Landham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 2004.
    • Fewsmith, Joseph. Elite Politics in Contemporary China. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc, 2001.
    • Fischer, Frank. Reframing Public Policy. Discoursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    • Fowler, Alan. “Getting Real about NGO Relationships in the Aid System.” In NGO Management, edited by Michael Edwards and Alan Fowler, 241-255. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2003.
    • Gao, Bingzhong. “The problem of social organisation′s legitimacy by law.” Chinese Social Science, no. 2 (2000): 100-109.
    • Ministry of Civil Affairs. “Document No. 23: Opinions of the Ministry of Civil Affairs on promoting urban community building across the country”. In Shequ cidian, edited by Hu Shensheng, 403-404. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.
    • Owen, Harrison. Open Space Technology: A User's Guide. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2008.
    • Plummer, Jannelle and John G. Taylor. Community Participation in China. Issues and Processes for Capacity Building. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2004.
    • Ren, Jianming and Zhizhou Du. “Institutionalized corruption: power overconcentration of the First-in-Command in China.” Crime Crime Law and Social Change, no. 49 (2008): 45-59.
    • Thomson, Ann Marie and James L. Perry. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review. Special Issue 24 (2006): 20-32.
    • Tsang, Steve. “Consultative Leninism: China's new political framework.” Journal of Contemporary China 62, no. 18 (2009): 865-880.
    • Unger, Jonathan. “Zhongguo de shehui tuanti, gongmin shehui he guojia zuhe zhuyi: you zhengyi de lingyu.” Kaifang Shidai (Open Times), no. 11 (2009): 133-140.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article