LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Grounds, P.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: PE
This thesis examines the deeper nature of sustainability, through the study of an English language curriculum development project for the creation of a self-access language learning resource centre at a Mexican public university.\ud \ud The research methodology follows broadly qualitative and ethnographic research principles and was influenced by post modern, heuristic and interpretative thought. The overall process has been heuristic, involving extended self-search, self-dialogue and self-discovery through on-going interaction with the context, the collaborators and other types of data. Some aspects of my own journey towards becoming a qualitative researcher arealso described, since this also formed an integral part of the research process.\ud \ud I aimed to create a thick description, through the collection and interrelation of a range of data types. During the interpretation process, numerous concepts and categories emerged as apparently having been closely interconnected during the evolution of the respective project processes, states, behaviours and artefacts. With frequent reference to the data, I will attempt to show that the deeper nature of project sustainability is perhaps more complex than existing descriptions may imply and that therefore existing definitions may be limited.\ud \ud I conclude by suggesting new ways of conceptualizing factors involved in the achievement of project sustainability and some approaches to implementing research in the area. I also suggest that the term “sustainability” may need to be redefined in the discourse of development project managers. Dynamic durability is suggested as a possible alternative, since it includes the attribute of being able to adapt to changing circumstances (Dynamic) yet can still embrace concepts and categories commonly associated with sustainability (Durability).\ud \ud The overall aims of this study are: to push forward the boundaries of existing knowledge and understanding of project sustainability, to stimulate further research and discussion among project managers and collaborators and to support more context-sensitive and Dynamically durable English language curriculum projects (and other development projects) in the future.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Category no. 16 17
    • 7. Awareness of long-term benefits Abercrombie, N., S. Hill and B. S. Turner (1984). Dictionary of Sociology. London: Penguin Books.
    • Adame, H., P. Grounds and C. Lethaby (2003). Activate! Monterrey, Mexico: Ediciones Castillo.
    • Ainscough, V. (1994). Sustainable methodologies: a call for more sensitivity to relevance in ELT Projects. The Teacher Trainer, 8/2: 16-19.
    • Alderson, J. C. and A. Beretta (1992). Evaluating Second Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Altheide D. L. and J. M. Johnson (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.): A Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 485-499.
    • Aston, G. (1993). The learner's contribution to the self-access centre. ELT Journal 47/3: 219-217.
    • Atkinson P. and M. Hammersley (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.): A Handbook of Qualitative Research, California: Sage Publications: 248-261.
    • Bardi, M., G. Chefneux, D. Comanetchi and T. Magureanu (eds.) (1999). Innovation in Teaching English for Specific Purposes in Romania - A Study of Impact. Bucharest: The British Council/Cavalloti Publishing House.
    • Barnett, L. and G. Jordan (1991). Self-access facilities: what are they for? ELT Journal 45/4: 305-312.
    • Barthes, R. (1967). The death of the author. Aspen 5 + 6/3 (n. p.). USA: UBU Foundation [online].
    • Available from: http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthes [Accessed 20 June, 2007].
    • Becker, H. S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, and R. Schweder (eds.): Essays on Ethnography and Human Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 53-71.
    • Belcher, D. and A. Hirvela (2005). Writing the qualitative dissertation: what motivates and sustains commitment to a fuzzy genre? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4:187-205.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article