Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kwak, Y.H.; Sadatsafavi, H.; Walewski, J.; Williams, Nigel (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Little research has been conducted on how project-based organizations navigate internal and external pressures to develop and improve project competences over time. Using a cases study approach, this paper examines the development and implementation of project based organization over a period of 30 years. Overall, the evolution of project management competencies in the organization broadly followed the prevailing approaches in improving organizational management practices uncovered in review of literature. The organization’s capability to adopt and implement project management frameworks improved over time as senior managers became more masterful at matching improvement actions into the organizational context. This research also presents how a systematic approach of project management maturity models for identifying and implementing project management practices and processes can increase the effectiveness and comprehensiveness of overall management practices. The study concludes with a series of recommendations in further improving project management practices and processes in project-based organizations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andersen, B., Henriksen, B., & Aarseth, W. (2007). Benchmarking of Project Management Office Establishment: Extracting Best Practices. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(2), 97-104. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(97)
    • Andersen, Erling S., & Jessen, Svein Arne. (2003). Project maturity in organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 457-461. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00088-1
    • Backlund, F., Chronéer, D., & Sundqvist, E. (2014). Project Management Maturity Models - A Critical Review: A Case Study within Swedish Engineering and Construction Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119(0), 837-846. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.094
    • Bate, Roger. (1995). A systems engineering capability maturity model, version 1.1. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
    • Bate, Roger, & Shrum, Sandra. (1998). CMM Integration (CMMI) Framework, NEWS AT SEI. Retrieved January 19, 2013, from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/news-at-sei/featuresept98pdf.cfm
    • Baumert, John H., & McWhinney, Mark S. (1992). Software measures and the capability maturity model. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
    • Bellini, Emilio, & Lo Storto, Corrado. (2006). The impact of software capability maturity model on knowledge management and organisational learning: empirical findings and useful insights. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 1(4), 339-373.
    • Campos, Krystl, & Trees, Lauren. (2008). Process measures and analytics : the right data for the right decisions : best practices report. Houston, TX: American Productivity and Quality Center.
    • Chandler, Alfred Dupont. (1969). Strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
    • Cleland, David I., & Ireland, Lewis R. (2006). Project management : strategic design and implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Common, R. . (2008). Administrative change in the [Persian] Gulf: modernization in Bahrain and Oman Source. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74 (2), 177-193.
    • Construction Industry Institute. (2006). CII Best Practices Guide : Improving Project Performance. Austin, Tx: Construction Industry Institute.
    • Construction Industry Institute. (2009). The Implementation Planning Model : Steps to Success. Austin, Tx: Construction Industry Institute
    • Cooke-Davies, Terry. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185-190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
    • Cooke‐Davies, Terence J, Crawford, Lynn H, & Lechler, Thomas G. (2009). Project management systems: Moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 110-123.
    • Crawford, L., Hobbs, J Brian , & Turner, John Rodney (2006). Aligning Capability with Strategy: Cagegorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right. Project management journal., 37(2), 38-50.
    • Crosby, Philip B. (1979). Quality is free : the art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Cummings, Thomas G., & Worley, Christopher G. (2009). Organization Development and Change (9th ed.). Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
    • Curtis, Bill, Hefley, Bill, Miller, Sally, & Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering, Inst. (2009). People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0, Second Edition. from http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA512354
    • Dai, Christine Xiaoyi, & Wells, William G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 523-532. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.001
    • Erdogan, B., Anumba, C., Bouchlaghem, D., & Nielsen, Y. Collaboration Environments for Construction: Management of Organizational Changes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 0(ja), null. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000231
    • Ford, R. C., & Randolph, W.A. (1992). Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management. Journal of Management Journal of Management, 18(2), 267-294.
    • Gareis, R. (1989). 'Management by projects': the management approach for the future. International journal of project management, 7(4), 243-249.
    • Gareis, R. (1991). Management by projects: the management strategy of the 'new' project-oriented company. International journal of project management, 9(2), 71-76.
    • Graham, Richard. (1999). Managing the project management process in Aerospace and Construction: a comparative approach. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 39-45. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00072-0
    • Green, S. . (2005). Strategic Project Management: From Maturity Model to Project Leadership. Project Management Journal, 36(2), 60-73.
    • Hakes, Chris. (2007). The EFQM excellence model for Assessing Organizational Performance For Assessing Organizational Performance - A Management Guide. from http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=998718
    • Hellström, Magnus, Ruuska, Inkeri, Wikström, Kim, & Jåfs, Daniel. (2013). Project governance and path creation in the early stages of Finnish nuclear power projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 712-723. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.01.005
    • Ibrahim, Linda, Bradford, Bill, Cole, David, LaBruyere, Larry, Leinneweber, Heidi, Piszczek, Dave, . . . Wells, Curt. (2001). The Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Capability Maturity Model (FAA-iCMM®), Version 2.0. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
    • International Project Management Association. (2002). IPMA Project Excellence Model. Retrieved December 05, 2009, from http://www.ipma.ch/awards/projexcellence/Pages/ProjectExcellenceModel.aspx
    • Jugdev K., & Thomas J. (2003). Project Management Maturity Models: the Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantages. Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4-14.
    • Jugdev, Kam, & Müller, Ralf. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project management journal, 36(4), 19-31.
    • Kerzner, Harold. (2001). Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model.
    • Kerzner, Harold. (2005). Project management : a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York, N.Y.; [Great Britain]: Wiley.
    • Klein, Louis, Biesenthal, Christopher, & Dehlin, Erlend. (2015). Improvisation in project management: A praxeology. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 267-277. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.011
    • Koskinen, Kaj U. (2012). Organizational Learning in Project-Based Companies: A Process Thinking Approach. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40-49. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21266
    • Kwak, Y. H. , & Ibbs, C. W. (1997). The Berkeley Project Management Process Maturity Model, Measuring the Value of Project Management. . Retrieved December 05, 2009, from http://home.gwu.edu/~kwak/Berkeley_Model.pdf
    • Kwak, Y. H., & Ibbs, C. W. . (2002). Project Management Process Maturity Model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), 150-155.
    • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing From Process Data. Academy of Management Review Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
    • Lappe, Marc, & Spang, Konrad. (2014). Investments in project management are profitable: A case study-based analysis of the relationship between the costs and benefits of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 603-612. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.005
    • Ling, Florence Yean Yng, Ong, Shi Ying, Ke, Yongjian, Wang, Shouqing, & Zou, Patrick. (2014). Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: Comparative study of Beijing and Sydney. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 275-285. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.008
    • Maier, Anja M, Moultrie, James, & Clarkson, PJohn. (2012). Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of maturity grids. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 59(1), 138- 159.
    • Marsh, Sarah J., & Stock, Gregory N. (2006). Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 422-436.
    • Martinsuo, Miia, Hensman, Nicole, Artto, Karlos, Kujala, Jaakko, & Jaafari, Ali. (2006). Project-Based Management as an Organizational Innovation: Drivers, Changes, And Benefits Of Adopting Project-Based Management. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 87-97.
    • Massini, Silvia, & Pettigrew, Andrew M. (2003). Complementarities in organizational innovation and performance. Innovative Forms of Organizing, AM Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, FVD Bosch, W. Ruigrok and T. Numagami (eds.), 133-172.
    • Medina, Rolf, & Medina, Alicia. (2014). The project manager and the organisation's long-term competence goal. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1459-1470. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.011
    • Miller, Danny. (1982). Evolution and Revolution: A Quantum View of Structural Change in Organizations. J Management Studies Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 131-151.
    • Mullaly, Mark. (2006). Longitudinal Analysis of Project Management Maturity. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 62-73.
    • Mullaly, Mark, & Thomas, Janice L. (2009). Exploring the dynamics of value and fit: Insights from project management. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 124-135. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20104
    • Negandhi, Anant R. (1974). A cross-cultural comparative study of management. Omega Omega, 2(6), 785-791.
    • Nolan, Richard L. (1973). Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Communications of the ACM, 16(7), 399-405.
    • Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the Temporary Organization: New Directions for Project Management Research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319-333.
    • Packendorff, J., & Lindgren, M. (2014). Projectification and its consequences: Narrow and broad conceptualisations. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 7-21.
    • Paulk, Mark C., & Software Engineering Institute. (1993). Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (SEI).
    • Pellegrinelli, Sergio, Murray-Webster, Ruth, & Turner, Neil. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 153-164. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.008
    • Project Management Institute. (2003). Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3) : knowledge foundation. Newton Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
    • Scott, W. Richard. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    • Seppänen, Veikko. (2002). Evolution of competence in software subcontracting projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 155-164. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00043-0
    • Shah, Rachna, & Ward, Peter T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of operations management, 25(4), 785-805.
    • Shenhar, Aaron J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394-414.
    • Software Engineering Institute. (2007). Introduction to the architecture of the CMMI framework. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (SEI).
    • Turner, J. Rodney, & Muller, Ralf. (2002). On The Nature of the Project as a Temporary Organization: Henley Management College.
    • Van de Ven, Andrew H., & Poole, Marshall Scott. (1993). Explaining development and change in organizations. [Minneapolis, Minn.]: Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.
    • Voss, Chris, Tsikriktsis, Nikos, & Frohlich, Mark. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195-219.
    • Wang, Catherine, & Ahmed, Pervaiz K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
    • Wendler, Roy. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317-1339. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007
    • Yazici, Hulya Julie. (2009). The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Newtown Square, Pa.: Project Management Institute.
    • Young, Raymond, & Grant, Jamie. (2015). Is strategy implemented by projects? Disturbing evidence in the State of NSW. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 15-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.010
    • Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., Sun, P. M., & Tam, C. M. (2009). Identifying cultural difference in R&D project for performance improvement: A field study. J. Bus. Econ. Manage. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 61-70.
    • Zqikael, O., Levin, G., & Rad, P. F. (2008). Top Management Support - The Project Friendly Organization. Cost Enginnering, 50(9), 22-29.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article