Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Otgaar, H.; Howe, M. L.; Smeets, T.; Garner, S. R. (2014)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF
Recent studies have revealed that memory is enhanced when information is processed for fitness-related purposes. The main objective of the current experiments was to test developmental trends in the evolutionary foundation of memory using different types of stimuli and paradigms. In Experiment 1, 11-year-olds and adults were presented with neutral, negative, and survival-related DRM word lists. We found a memory benefit for the survival-related words and showed that false memories were more likely to be elicited for the survival-related word lists than for the other lists. Experiment 2 examined developmental trends in the survival processing paradigm using neutral, negative, and survival-related pictures. A survival processing advantage was found for survival-related pictures in adults, for negative pictures in 11/12-year-olds, and for neutral pictures in 7/8-year-olds. In Experiment 3, 11/12-year-olds and adults had to imagine the standard survival scenario or an adapted survival condition (or pleasantness condition) that was designed to reduce the possibilities for elaborative processing. We found superior memory retention for both survival scenarios in children and adults. Collectively, our results evidently show that the survival processing advantage is developmentally invariant and that certain proximate mechanisms (elaboration and distinctiveness) underlie these developmental trends.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, J. R. & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96, 703-719.
    • Aslan, A., & Bauml, K.-H. T. (2012). Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information. Cognition, 122, 118-122.
    • Bjorklund, D.F. (1987). A note on neonatal imitation. Developmental Review, 7, 86-92.
    • Brainerd, C.J., Reyna, V.F., & Ceci, S.J. (2008). Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 343
    • Burns, D. J., Burns, S. A., & Hwang, A. J. (2011). Adaptive memory: Determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 206-218.
    • Buss, D.M. (2009). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    • Buss, D.M., Haselton, M.G., Shackelford, T.K., Bleske, A.L., & Wakefield, J.C. (1998). Adaptation, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533-548.
    • Confer, J.C., Easton, J.A., Fleischman, D.S., Goetz, C.D., Lewis, D.M.G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D.M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology. Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110-126.
    • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
    • D'Agostino, P. R., O'Neill, B. J., & Paivio, A. (1977). Memory for pictures and words as a function of level of processing: Depth or dual coding? Memory & Cognition, 5, 252-256.
    • Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
    • Dewhurst, S.A., Thorley, C., Hammond, E.R., & Ormerod, T.C. (2011). Convergent, but not divergent, thinking predicts susceptibility to associative memory illusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 73-76.
    • Gould, S.J., & Lewontin, R.C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique on the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 205, 581-598.
    • Howe, M. L. (2006). Developmental invariance in distinctiveness effects in memory. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1193-1205.
    • Howe, M. L. (2011a). The adaptive nature of memory and its illusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 312-315.
    • Howe, M. L. (2011b). The nature of early memory: An adaptive theory of the genesis and development of memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Howe, M. L., & Derbish, M. H. (2010). On the susceptibility of adaptive memory to false memory illusions. Cognition, 115, 252-267.
    • Howe, M. L., Garner, S. R., Charlesworth, M., & Knott, L. (2011). A brighter side to false memory illusions: False memories can prime children's and adults' insight-based problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 383-393
    • Howe, M. L., & Otgaar, H. (2013). Proximate mechanisms and the development of adaptive memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 16-22.
    • Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 471-480.
    • Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1151-1156.
    • Klein, S., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109, 306-329.
    • Klein, S., Robertson, T.E., & Delton, A.W. (2011). The future-orientation of memory: Planning as a key component mediating the high levels of recall found with survival processing. Memory, 19, 121-139.
    • Kroneisen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2011). On the plasticity of the survival processing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1553-1562.
    • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1995). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. A-4). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
    • Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1985). Cognitive foundations and social functions of imitation and intermodal representation in infancy. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 139-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Mintzer, M.Z.,& Snodgrass,J.G.(1999).The picture superiority effect: Support for the distinctiveness model. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 113-146.
    • Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 239-243.
    • Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 1-22.
    • Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180.
    • Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available: http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation
    • Otgaar, H., Jelicic, M., & Smeets, T. (2013). Adaptive memory: Item-specific, relational, and elaborative processing in the survival processing advantage. Submitted for publication.
    • Otgaar, H., & Smeets, T. (2010). Adaptive memory: Survival processing increases both true and false memory in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1010-1016.
    • Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Verschuere, B., Galliot, A., & van Riel, L. (2011). Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1033-1041.
    • Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & van Bergen, S. (2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory for fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23-28.
    • Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 365-377.
    • Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in a list. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
    • Rovee-Collier, C., & Cuevas, K. (2009). Multiple memory systems are unnecessary to account for infant memory development: An ecological model. Developmental Psychology, 45, 160-174.
    • Savine, A. C., Skullin, M. K., & Roediger, H. L., III (2011). Survival processing of faces. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1359-1373.
    • Schacter, D.L., Guerin, S.A., & St. Jacques, P.L. (2011). Memory distortion: An adaptive perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 467-474.
    • Scott-Phillips, T.C., Dickins, T.E., & West, S.A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimateproximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 38-47.
    • Seamon, J.G., Bohn, J.M., Coddington, I.E., Inslee, E., Ebling, M.C., Grund, E.M., Haring, C.T., Jang, S., Kim. D., Liong, C., Paley, F.M., Pang, L.K., & Siddique, A.H. (2012). Can survival processing enhance story memory? Testing the generalizability of the adaptive memory framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1045-1056.
    • Smeets, T., Otgaar, H., Raymaekers, L., Peters, M. V., & Merckelbach, H. (2012). Survival processing in times of stress. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 113-118.
    • Soderstrom, N. C. & McCabe, D. P. (2011). Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestal priorities? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 564-569.
    • Toglia, M.P., Neuschatz, J.S., & Goodwin, K.A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory, 7, 233-256.
    • Tse, C., & Altaribba, J. (2010). Does survival processing enhance implicit memory? Memory & Cognition, 38, 1110-1121.
    • Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory & Cognition, 36, 913-919.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article