LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Germond-Duret, CV
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: GN
The debates over Indigenous peoples and development are often framed within the discussion on the shift towards modernity, the imposition of economic liberalism, and the resistance against external interventions, with a tendency to see Indigenous peoples as a possible alternative to the world economic order. However, looking at many development agencies’ discourses, the idea that Indigenous peoples would actually benefit from modernity prevails. The literature is divided along these two conflicting views and dominated by binary oppositions: traditional/modern; backward/advanced; sustainable/unsustainable, etc. This article discusses the tradition/modernity dichotomy and raises the following questions: is it relevant to think in terms of modernity/tradition in the case of Indigenous peoples? What does the use of such a dichotomy imply? What is the alternative? This article demonstrates that this binary opposition is neither relevant nor desirable, and that a new analytical framework is required. Instead, it proposes to use a Normalisation framework, which focuses on the attempts made to ‘normalise’ Indigenous peoples and encourage them to comply with existing social and economic models.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agrawal, Arun. “Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge.” Development and Change 26, no. 3 (1995): 413-439.
    • Amin, Samir. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1989.
    • Barnard, Alan. “Indigenous peoples: A response to Justin Kenrick and Jerome Lewis.” Anthropology Today 20 (2004):19.
    • Barnard, Alan. “Kalahari revisionism, Vienna and the 'indigenous peoples' debate.” Social Anthropology 14, no. 1 (2006): 7-8.
    • Barras, Bruno. “Life projects: development our way”. In In the way of development: indigenous peoples, life projects and globalization, edited by Blaser, Mario, Harvey A. Feit, and Glenn McRae, 47-51. Zed/International Development Research Centre, 2004.
    • Bendix, Reinhard. “Tradition and Modernity reconsidered.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 9, no.3 (1967): 292-346.
    • Blaser, Mario, Harvey A. Feit, and Glenn McRae, eds. In the way of development: indigenous peoples, life projects and globalization. Zed/International Development Research Centre, 2004.
    • Bodley, John. “The World Bank tribal policy: criticisms and recommendations”. In Tribal peoples and development issues. A global overview, edited by John Bodley, 406-413. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1983.
    • Castree, Noel. “Differential geographies: place, indigenous rights and 'local' resources.” Political Geography 23 (2004): 133-167.
    • Caufield, Catherine. Masters of illusion: the World Bank and the poverty of Nations. London: Pan books, 1998.
    • Crowe, Marie. “Discourse analysis: towards an understanding of its place in nursing.” Methodological Issues in Nursing Research 51, no.1 (2005): 55-63.
    • Curry, George N. “Moving Beyond Postdevelopment: Facilitating Indigenous Alternatives for 'Development'.” Economic Geography 79, no.4 (2003): 405-423.
    • Delgado, Juana Vera, and Margreet, Zwarteveen. “Modernity, exclusion and resistance: water and indigenous struggles in Peru.” Development 51 (2008): 114-120.
    • Derrida, Jacques. Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
    • Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
    • Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
    • Ferguson, James. The anti-politics machine: development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.
    • Fitzsimons, Patrick, and Graham Smith. “Philosophy and Indigenous Cultural Transformation.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 32, no.1 (2000): 25-41.
    • Fletcher, Robert. “What are we fighting for? Rethinking resistance in a Pehuenche community in Chile”. The Journal of Peasant Studies 28, no.3 (2001): 37-66.
    • Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. 1991 reprint, London: Penguin, 1979.
    • Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.
    • Germond-Duret, Celine. “From Avatar to Reality: Development, Environment and the Representation of Cameroonian Pygmies.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 19 (2012): 129-151.
    • Germond-Duret, Celine. Banque Mondiale, Peuples Autochtones et Normalisation [World Bank, Indigenous Peoples and Normalisation]. Paris : Karthala, 2011.
    • Giddens, Anthony, and Christopher Pierson. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
    • Washington, DC: World Bank, 1982.
    • Gould, Harold A. “Is the modernity-tradition model all bad?” Economic and Political Weekly 5, no.29/31 (1970): 1171-1176.
    • Gusfield, Joseph R. “Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced polarities in the study of social change.” The American Journal of Sociology 72, no.4 (1967): 351-362.
    • Habermas, Jürgen. “Modernity versus Postmodernity.” New German Critique 22 (1981): 3-14.
    • Hakenholz, Thomas. “Un peuple autochtone face à la 'modernité': la communauté MapuchePewenche et le barrage Ralco (Alto Bío Bío, Chili)” [Indigenous Peoples facing 'modernity' : the Mapuche-Pehuenche community and the Ralco dam], Cahiers d'outre-mer Oct-Dec 2004 (2004): 347-366.
    • Havemann, Paul. “Denial, Modernity and Exclusion: Indigenous Placelessness in Australia.” Macquarie Law Journal 5 (2005): 57-80.
    • Hirtz, Frank. “It Takes Modern Means to be Traditional: On Recognizing Indigenous Cultural Communities in the Philippines.” Development and Change 34, no.5 (2003): 887-914.
    • Hopwood, Bill, Mary Mellor, and Geoff O'Brien. “Sustainable development: mapping different approaches.” Sustainable Development 13, no.1 (2005): 38-52.
    • Ivison, Duncan, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders. Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    • Jakobson, Roman. Selected Writings. Volume VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1985.
    • Jammulamadaka, Nimruji. “Smart Strategy or Great Tragedy? Vedanta Alumina and the Dongria Kondhs”. Journal of Business Ethics Education 9 (2012): 431-446.
    • Sardar, Ziauddin. “Development and the locations of eurocentrism”. In Critical development theory, edited by Munck, Ronaldo, and Denis O'Hearn, 44-62. London: Zed Books, 1999.
    • Saugestad, Sidsel. The inconvenient indigenous: Remote area development in Botswana, donor assistance and the first people of the Kalahari. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2001.
    • Schaeffer, Timo. “Engaging Modernity : the political making of indigenous movements in Bolivia and Ecuador, 1900-2008”. Third World Quarterly 30, no. 2 (2009): 397-413.
    • Schulte-Tenckhoff, Isabelle. La question des peuples autochtones [The Indigenous peoples issue], Paris : Bruyant-Bruxelles L.G.D.J., Collection Axes Savoir, 1997.
    • Seidman, Steven. “Deconstructing queer theory or the under-theorization of the social and the ethical”. In Social Postmodernism: beyond identity politics, edited by Nicholson, Linda, and Steven Seidman, 116-141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1995.
    • Seth, Sanjay. “Modernity without Prometheus: on re-reading Mashall Berman's All that is Solid Melts into Air.” Third World Quarterly 33, no. 7 (2012): 1377-1386.
    • Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. “The Violence of Development”. The Washington Post. 9 August 2001.
    • Shiner, Larry E. “Tradition/Modernity: an ideal-type gone astray.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 17, no. 2 (1975): 245-252.
    • Speed, Shannon. “Global discourses on the local terrain: Human rights and indigenous identity in Chiapas”, Cultural Dynamics 14, no. 2 (2002): 205-228.
    • Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous People. Commission on Human Rights. E/CN.4/2003/90. 21 April 2003.
    • Survival International. “Botswana president in racist outburst against Kalahari Bushmen”, News. 10 December 2010. http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6754 (accessed 6 November 2014).
    • Tauli-Corpuz, Victoria. “Our right to remain separate and distinct”. In Paradigm wars: indigenous peoples' resistance to globalization, edited by Mander, Jerry, and Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, 13-21. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 2006a.
    • Tauli-Corpuz, Victoria. “World Bank and IMF impacts on indigenous economies”. In Paradigm wars: indigenous peoples' resistance to globalization, edited by Mander, Jerry, and Victoria TauliCorpuz, 49-58. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 2006b.
    • Teubner, Gunther. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
    • The Hindu. 2013. “Bear mauls Chenchu tribal to death in Chinabodu”. Correction section. 21 October 2013. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/bear-mauls-chenchutribal-to-death-in-chinabodu/article5257157.ece (accessed 6 November 2014).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article