LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Naidoo, R.; Gosling, J.; Bolden, R.; O'Brien, A.; Hawkins, B. (2014)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: capital, field, habitus, identity, branding, leadership, Bourdieu
This paper explores the growth of corporate branding in higher education (HE) and its use by academic and professional managers as a mechanism for not only enhancing institutional reputation but also for facilitating internal culture change. It uses Bourdieu’s framework of field, capital and habitus to analyse case studies of branding in two English business schools from the perspectives of academics, management and professional staff and students. The findings reveal a number of tensions and inconsistencies between the experiences of these groups that highlight the contested nature of branding in HE. In an era of rankings, metrics and student fees, it is suggested that branding has become an important means through which HE leaders and managers (re)negotiate the perceived value of different forms of capital and their relative positions within the field. Whilst branding operates at a largely ideological level it has a material effect on the allocation of power and resources within institutions. This is an important development in a sector that has typically privileged scientific capital and contributes towards an understanding of the ways in which leadership is ‘distributed’ within universities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O'Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M. & Haslam, S.A. (2012). Academic Leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education, London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
    • Bolden, R., Petrov, G. & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: towards a multi-level model of leadership practice, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358- 376.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital, in Richardson, G.R. (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Deem, R. and Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education, Oxford Review of Education, 31 (2), 217-235.
    • Fairhurst, G.T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research, Human Relations, 62(11): 1607-1633.
    • Forbes, J. (2012). Structure and Agency in the Brand Box: a self-ethnography of university branding. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter.
    • Gioia, D.A. and Corley, K.G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 107-120.
    • Gosling, J., Bolden, R. & Petrov, G. (2009). Distributed leadership: what does it accomplish? Leadership, 5(3), 299-310.
    • Green, A. I. (2008). The social organization of desire: the sexual fields approach, Sociological Theory, 26: 25-50.
    • Green, A. I. (2013). 'Erotic capital' and the power of desirability: why 'honey money' is a bad collective strategy for remedying gender inequality, Sexualities, 16(1-2), 137-158.
    • Hakim, C. (2010a). Erotic Capital, European Sociological Review, 26(5), 499-518.
    • Hakim, C. (2010b). Attractive forces at work, Times Higher Education, 3rd June.
    • Hemsley-Brown, J. & Goonawarddana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization in the international higher education market, Journal of Business Research, 60, 942-948.
    • Hemsley-Brown, J. & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316-338.
    • Jevons, C. (2006). Universities: a prime example of branding gone wrong, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(7), 466-467.
    • Kornberger, M. (2010). Brand Society: How brands transform management and lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lumby, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: the uses and abuses of power, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, (5/6), in Press.
    • Michael, R. T. (2004). Sexual capital: an extension of Grossman's concept of health capital, Journal of Health Economics, 23(4), 643-652.
    • Morgen, J. (2011). Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings, Times Higher Education, 10th March.
    • Naidoo R (2003). Repositioning higher education as a global commodity: opportunities and challenges for future sociology of education work, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 249-259.
    • Naidoo, R. (2008). The competitive state and the mobilised market: higher education policy reform in the United Kingdom (1980-2007), Critique Internationale. Presses de Sciences Po., 47-65.
    • Naidoo, R., Shankar, A. & Veer, E. (2011). The consumerist turn in higher education: policy aspirations and outcomes, Journal of Marketing Management, 27 (11-12), 1142-1162
    • Pettinger, L. (2004). Brand culture and branded workers: service work and aesthetic labour in fashion retail, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 7(2), 165-184.
    • Sullivan, K., Gosling, J. & Schroeder, J. (2013). On being branded, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29 (2), 121-122.
    • Sveningsson, S. & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle, Human Relations, 56(10), 1163-1193
    • Temple, P. (2006). Branding higher education: illusion or reality? Perspectives, 10(1), 15-19.
    • Waeraas, A., & Solbakk, M. (2009). Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding, Higher Education, 57, 449-462.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article