LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wickstead, Helen; Barber, Martyn (2012)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: art, archaeology
The origins of archaeological methods are often surprising, revealing unexpected connections between science, art and entertainment. This paper explores aerial survey, a visual method commonly represented as distancing or objective. We show how aerial survey’s visualising practices embody subjective notions of vision emerging throughout the nineteenth century. Aerial survey smashes linear perspective, fragments time-space, and places radical doubt at the root of claims to truth. Its techniques involve hallucination, and its affinities are with stop-motion photography and cinema. Exposing the juvenile dementia of aerial survey’s infancy releases practitioners and critics from the impulse to defend or demolish its ‘enlightenment’ credentials.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baines, A., 2005. Using photography in archaeology, in From the Air: Understanding Aerial Archaeology, eds. K. Brophy & D. Cowley. Stroud: Tempus, 168-85.
    • Baldwin, T., 1786. Airopaidia: Containing the Narrative of a Balloon Excursion from Chester, the Eighth of September, 1785. London: W. Lowndes.
    • Barber, M., 2006. Aerial photography and the Ordnance Survey: an episode from the 1880s. Sheetlines 76, 6-13.
    • Barber, M., 2011. A History of Aerial Photography and Archaeology: Mata Hari's Glass Eye and Other Stories. Swindon: English Heritage.
    • Barber, M. & H. Wickstead, 2010. 'One immense black spot': aerial views of London 1784-1918. The London Journal 35(3), 236-54.
    • Bradford, J., 1957. Ancient Landscapes. (Studies in Field Archaeology.) London: G. Bell and Sons.
    • Brophy, K., 2005. Subjectivity, bias and perception in aerial archaeology, in From the Air: Understanding Aerial Archaeology, eds. K. Brophy & D. Cowley. Stroud: Tempus, 33-49.
    • Brophy, K. & D. Cowley, 2005. From the air - an introduction, in From the Air: Understanding Aerial Archaeology, eds. K. Brophy & D. Cowley. Stroud: Tempus, 11-23.
    • Castro, T., 2009. Cinema's mapping impulse: questioning visual culture. The Cartographic Journal 46(1), 9-15.
    • Chippindale, C., 1985. John Briotn's 'Celtic Cabinet' in Devizes Museum and its context. Antiquaries Journal 65, 121-38.
    • Clarke, D. & M. Doel, 2005. Engineering space and time: moving pictures and motionless trips. Journal of Historical Geography 31, 41-60.
    • Clegg, B., 2007. The Man Who Stopped Time: Eadweard Muybridge - Pioneer Photographer, Father of the Motion Picture, Murderer. Stroud: Suotn Publishing.
    • Collier, P., 2002. The impact on topographic mapping of developments in land and air survey: 1900-1939.Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29(3), 155-74.
    • Cowley, D. & S. Gilmour, 2005. Some observations on the nature of aerial survey, in From the Air: Understanding Aerial Archaeology, eds. K. Brophy & D. Cowley. Stroud: Tempus, 50-63.
    • Crary, J., 1992. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
    • Crary, J., 2001. Suspensions of Perception: Aetntion, Spectacle and Modern Culture. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
    • Crary, J., 2002. Gericault, the Panorama, and sites of reality in the early nineteenth century. Grey Room 9, 5-25.
    • Crawford, O. & A. Keiller, 1928. Wessex from the Air. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Daston, L. & P. Galison, 1992. The image of objectivity. Representations 40, 81-126.
    • Daston, L. & P. Galison, 2010. Objectivity. New York (NY): Zone Books.
    • della Dora, V., 2009. Travelling landscape-objects. Progress in Human Geography 33(3), 334-54.
    • Doty, R., 1983. Aloft with balloon and camera, in The View from Above: 125 Years of Aerial Photography,ed. R. Martin. London: The Photographer's Gallery, 9-18.
    • Evans, C., 2000. Megalithic follies: Soane's 'Druidic remains' and the display of monuments. Journal of Material Culture 5, 347-66.
    • Evans, C., 2007. 'Delineating objects': nineteenth-century antiquarian culture and the project of archaeology, in Visions of Antiquity: The Society of Antiquaries of London 1707-2007, ed. S. Pearce. London: Society of Antiquaries of London, 267-305.
    • Galton, F., 1865. On stereoscopic maps, taken from models of mountainous countries. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society 1865, 99-105.
    • General Sta,f 1917. Notes on the Interpretation of Aeroplane Photographs. [London]: Royal Flying Corps.
    • Gough, P., 1995. 'Tales from the bushy-topped tree': a brief survey of military sketching. Annual Review of the Imperial War Museum. Available at: hpt://www.vortex.uwe. ac.uk/bushy.htm.
    • Gritfihs, A., 2003. 'Shivers down your spine': Panoramas and the origins of the cinematic re-enactment. Screen 44, 1-37.
    • Hamilton, G.E., 1949. Oliver Wendell Holmes: His Pioneer Stereoscope and the Later Industry. New York (NY): Newcomen Society in North America.
    • Harvey, D., 1991. The Condition of Postmodernity: an Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: WileyBlackwell.
    • Hauser, K., 2007. Shadow Sites: Photography, Archaeology, and the British Landscape 1927-1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hauser, K., 2008. Bloody Old Britain: O.G.S. Crawford and the Archaeology of Modern Life. London: Granta Books.
    • Huhtamo, E., 2009. Aeronautikon! or, the journey of the balloon panorama. Early Popular Visual Culture 7(3), 295-306.
    • Johnson, M.H., 2006. Ideas of Landscape. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Jones, J.J., 2006. Absorbing hesitation: Wordsworth and the theory of the Panorama. Studies in Romanticism 45(3), 357-75.
    • Kelly, J., 1991. Photographic reality and French literary realism: nineteenth-century synchronism and symbiosis. The French Review 65(2), 195-205.
    • Lightman, B., 2000. The visual theology of Victorian popularisers of science: from reverent eye to chemical retina. Isis 91(4), 651-80.
    • May, J. & N. Thri,ft 2001. Introduction, in Timespace: Geographies of Temporality, eds. J. May & N. Thri.ft London: Routledge, 1-46.
    • McMahan, A., 2003. Alice Guy Blaché, Lost Cinematic Visionary. London: Continuum.
    • Miller, J., 2010. On the Move: Visualising Action. London: Estorick Collection.
    • Muybridge, E., 1887. Animal Locomotion: an Electro-photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Newhall, B., 1969. Airborne Camera: the World from the Air and Outer Space. London: The Focal Press.
    • Paris, M., 1992. Winged Warfare: the Literature and Theory of Aerial Warfare in Britain, 1859-1917. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    • Raçzkowski, W., 2002. Beyond the technology: Do we need 'meta-aerial archaeology'?, in Aerial Archaeology: Developing Future Practice, eds. R.H. Bewley & W. Raczkowski. (NATO Science Series.) Amsterdam: IOS Press, 311-27.
    • Schwartz, J. & J. Ryan, 2003. Introduction: photography and the geographical imagination, in Picturing Place: Photography and the Geographical Imagination, eds. J. Schwartz & J. Ryan. London & New York (NY): I.B. Tauris, 1-18.
    • Stepney, E., 2005. Parallax: the eefct of aerial photography as a structured perception upon terrestrial archaeological survey, in Seeing the Past: Building Knowledge of the Past and Present through Acts of Seeing. Stanford University. Available at hpt://traumwerk.stanford.edu:3455/31/330 .
    • Stewart Howe, K., 2003. Mapping a sacred geography: photographic surveys by the Royal Engineers in the Holy Land, 1864-68, in Picturing Place: Photography and the Geographical Imagination, eds. J. Schwartz & J. Ryan. London & New York (NY): I.B. Tauris, 1-18.
    • Thomas, J., 1993. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, ed. B. Bender. (Explorations in Anthropology.) Oxford: Berg, 19-48.
    • Thomas, J., 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
    • Thomas, J., 2008. On the ocularcentrism of archaeology, in Archaeology and the Politics of Vision in a Post-Modern Context. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1-12.
    • Virilio, P., 1994. The Vision Machine. Bloomington & Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press.
    • Wickstead, H., 2009. The Über-archaeologist: art, GIS and the male gaze revisited. Journal of Social Archaeology 9(2), 249-71.
    • Wilkinson, T., 2008. Falling out of an aircra:ft aerovisualism and the aerial photography of J.S.P. Bradford. Visual Anthropology 21(1), 18-38.
    • Wilson, D.R., 2000. Air Photo Interpretation for Archaeologists 2nd edition. Stroud: Tempus.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article