Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Alrobai, Amen; McAlaney, John; Phalp, Keith T.; Ali, Raian (2016)
Publisher: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 9638: 288-300
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Digital Addiction (DA) denotes a problematic usage of digital devices characterised by properties such as being compulsive, impulsive, excessive and hasty. DA is associated with negative behaviours such as anxiety and depression. “Digital Detox” programs have started to appear and are mainly based on a relatively expensive and heavyweight in-patient care utilising traditional solutions such as motivational interviews and cognitive behavioural therapies. For moderate addiction, persuasive technology could have potential, as a brief intervention, to assist users to regulate their usage. This paper explores the design of online peer groups as a persuasive technique that puts together people who share a common interest in combating their DA or in helping others to do so. We conducted empirical research to explore design aspects of this mechanism. The results raise a range of questions and challenges to address when developing such a technique for the behaviour change needed against DA.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Cheng, C., Li, A.Y.-L.: Internet Addiction Prevalence and Quality of (Real) Life: A MetaAnalysis of 31 Nations Across Seven World Regions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 17, 755-760 (2014).
    • 2. Kuss, D.J., Griffiths, M.D., Binder, J.F.: Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 29, 959-966 (2013).
    • 3. Young, K.S., de Abreu, C.N.: Internet Addiction: A Handbook and Guide to Evaluation and Treatment. (2011).
    • 4. China Youth Association for Network Development: Young Internet addicts on the rise, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/03/content_9417660.htm.
    • 5. Ali, R., Jiang, N., Phalp, K., Muir, S., McAlaney, J.: The Emerging Requirement for Digital Addiction Labels. REFSQ. 9013, 198-213 (2015).
    • 6. Ko, M., Yang, S., Lee, J., Heizmann, C., Jeong, J., Lee, U., Shin, D., Yatani, K., Song, J., Chung, K.-M.: NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. Presented at the February (2015).
    • 7. Leigh, S., Flatt, S.: App-based psychological interventions: friend or foe? Evidence Based Mental Health. (2015).
    • 8. Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., Poulin, F.: When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist. 54, 755-764 (1999).
    • 9. Karau, S.J., Williams, K.D.: Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65, 681-706 (1993).
    • 10. Allen, V.: Situational factors in conformity. Advances in experimental social psychology (1965).
    • 11. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Pakkanen, T.: Do Persuasive Technologies Persuade? - A Review of Empirical Studies. PERSUASIVE. 8462, 118-136 (2014).
    • 12. Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Kloos, B., Weingarten, R., Stayner, D., Tebes, J.K.: Peer Support Among Individuals With Severe Mental Illness: A Review of the Evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 6, 165-187 (2006).
    • 13. Moos, R.H., Moos, B.S.: Help-seeking careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 26, 167-173 (2004).
    • 14. Moos, R.H., Moos, B.S.: Paths of Entry Into Alcoholics Anonymous: Consequences for Participation and Remission. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. 29, 1858- 1868 (2005).
    • 15. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence. HarperCollins (2009).
    • 16. Riessman, F.: The “Helper” Therapy Principle. Social Work. 10, 27-32 (1965).
    • 17. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. (1991).
    • 18. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: A theory of goal setting & task performance. (1990).
    • 19. Webb, T.L., Sniehotta, F.F., Michie, S.: Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours. Addiction. 105, 1879-1892 (2010).
    • 20. Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. PERSUASIVE. 30 (2009).
    • 21. Coleman, M.C., Webber, J.: Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Theory and Practice. Allyn & Bacon (2002).
    • 22. Strecher, V.J., Seijts, G.H., Kok, G.J., Latham, G.P., Glasgow, R., DeVellis, B., Meertens, R.M., Bulger, D.W.: Goal Setting as a Strategy for Health Behavior Change. Health Educ Behav. 22, 190-200 (1995).
    • 23. Maitland, J., Chalmers, M.: Self-monitoring, self-awareness, and self-determination in cardiac rehabilitation. CHI. 1213-1222 (2010).
    • 24. Vohs, K.D., Baumeister, R.F.: Handbook of Self-Regulation, Second Edition. Guilford Press (2013).
    • 25. Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L.G., Ménard, S.: The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 29, 157-166 (1997).
    • 26. Prochaska, D.J.O.: Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. In: Gellman, M.D. and Turner, J.R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. pp. 1997-2000. Springer New York, New York, NY (2013).
    • 27. Ewing, J.A.: Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. Jama. (1984).
    • 28. Fogg, B.J.: A behavior model for persuasive design. PERSUASIVE. 40 (2009).
    • 29. Snowden, L., Cotler, S.: The effectiveness of paraprofessional ex-addict counselors in a methadone treatment program. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 11, 331-338 (1974).
    • 30. Allen, J.P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., Marston, E.: Predictors of Susceptibility to Peer Influence Regarding Substance Use in Adolescence. Child Development. 83, 337-350 (2011).
    • 31. Bono, J.E., Judge, T.A.: Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89, 901-910 (2004).
    • 32. Shamir, B., House, R.J., Arthur, M.B.: The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Science. 4, 577-594 (1993).
    • 33. McAlaney, J., Bewick, B., Hughes, C.: The international development of the “Social Norms” approach to drug education and prevention. Drugs: education. 18, 81-89 (2011).
    • 34. Kelman, H.C.: Interests, Relationships, Identities: Three Central Issues for Individuals and Groups in Negotiating Their Social Environment. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 1-26 (2006).
    • 35. Ennett, S.T., Bauman, K.E.: The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67, 653-663 (1994).
    • 36. Fuegen, K., Brehm, J.W.: The intensity of affect and resistance to social influence. Resistance and persuasion. (2004).
    • 37. Darley, J.M.: Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry. 3, 199- 218 (1992).
    • 38. Wright, K.B., Bell, S.B., Wright, K.B., Bell, S.B.: Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory. J Health Psychol. 8, 39-54 (2003).
    • 39. Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M.: An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science. (2001).
    • 40. Kobsa, A., Schreck, J.: Privacy through pseudonymity in user-adaptive systems. TOIT. 3, 149-183 (2003).
    • 41. Griffiths, M.: A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use. 10, 191-197 (2005).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article