LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Goodenough, Anne E; Deans, Liam; Whiteley, Laura; Pickering, Simon (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: GE
Identifiers:doi:10.2981/wlb.00131
Bat activity surveys (walked surveys combining transect and point counts) are extremely important for collecting data throughout Europe in conservation and planning contexts. To ensure optimal data, it is vital to ensure synchronicity between survey time and peak bat activity. However, although protocols for two-hour dusk activity surveys are well accepted, recommended start time in relation to sunset is a ‘best guess’ rather than based on empirical evidence. Accepted practice differs widely with recommended start times varying from 30 min pre-sunset (finishing 90 min post-sunset) to 30 min post-sunset (finishing 2.5 h after sunset). We provide the first empirical test of optimal start times for dusk activity surveys by comparing bat activity at the same sites on the same nights. Four sites were surveyed, viz. two high-quality woodland sites and two low-quality agricultural sites. At each site, surveyors walked the same route and stopped at the same pre-defined listening points for three repeat surveys per night: 1) starting 30 min pre-sunset; 2) starting at sunset; and 3) starting 30 min post-sunset. In total, 240 hours' of data were collected. Four species, all widespread and common throughout Europe, were recorded: common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus, soprano pipistrelle P. pygmaeus, Natterer's Myotis natterai and noctule Nyctalus noctule. Recorded bat activity was highest on sunset and post-sunset surveys both generally (overall bat activity) and for all specific species encountered. Findings were generally consistent for both low- and high-quality habitats. The same species were generally represented in both point and transect data but point data yielded higher estimates of overall activity in low-quality habitat and higher bat species richness in both high- and low-quality habitat relative to transect data. We recommend that: 1) two-hour dusk bat activity surveys start at/after sunset not before sunset and 2) both transect and point data are collected and analysed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bat Conservation Trust 2007. Bat surveys: good practice guidelines. - Bat Conservation Trust.
    • Bat Conservation Trust 2012. Bat surveys: good practice guidelines, 2nd edn. - Bat Conservation Trust.
    • Battersby, J. 2010.Guidelines for surveillance and monitoring of European Bats. - EUROBATS Publication number 5.
    • Downs, N. C. and Racey, P. A. 2007. Temporal and spatial differences in the emission of calls by pipistrelle bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus. - Acta Theriol. 52: 55-64.
    • Duvergé, P. L., Jones, G., Rydell, J. and Ransome, R. D. 2000. Functional significance of emergence timing in bats. - Ecography 23: 32-40.
    • European Environment Agency (2013) European bat population trends: a prototype biodiversity indicator. - EEA Technical report 19/2013.
    • Hayes, J. P. 1997. Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation-monitoring studies. - J. Mammal. 78: 514-524.
    • Hutson, A. M., Mickleburgh, S. P. and Racey, P. A. 2001. Microchiropteran bats: global status survey and conservation action plan - IUCN/SSC Chiroptera Specialist Group, IUCN.
    • Johnson, J. B., Menzel, M. A., Edwards, J. W. and Ford, M. W. 2002. A comparison of 2 acoustical bat survey techniques. - Wildlife Soc. B. 30: 931-936.
    • Jones, G and Rydell, J. 1994. Foraging strategy and predation risk as factors influencing emergence time in echolocating bats. - Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B. 346: 445 - 455.
    • Jones, G. 2004 Where do we go from here? In: Brigham, R. M., Kalko, E. K. V., Jones, G. Parsons, S. and Limpens, H. J. G. A. (eds) Bat echolocation research: tools, techniques and analysis. Bat Conservation International pp 166-167.
    • Kunz, T. H. 1973. Resource utlilization: temporal and spatial components of bat activity in central Iowa. - J. Mammal. 54:14-32.
    • Lacki, M. J., Hayes, J. P. and Kurta, A. 2007. Bats in Forests: Conservation and Management. - John Hopkins University Press.
    • Law, B., Anderson, J. and Chidel, M. 1998. A bat survey in state forests on the south-west slopes region of New South Wales with suggestions of improvements for future surveys. - Australian Zoologist 30: 467-479.
    • Milne, D. J., Armstrong, M., Fisher, A., Flores, T. and Pavey, C. R. 2004. A comparison of three survey methods for collecting bat echolocation calls and species-accumulation rates from nightly Anabat recordings. - Wildlife Res. 31: 57-63.
    • Racey, P. A. and Entwistle, A. C. 2005. Conservation ecology of bats. - In: Kunz, T. H. and Fenton, M. B. (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, pp. 680-744.
    • Richards, G. C. 2001. Towards defining adequate bat survey methodology: why electronic call detection is essential throughout the night. - The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter 16: 24-28.
    • Russ, J. 2012 British Bat Calls: A Guide to Species Identification. - Pelagic Publishing.
    • Rydell, J., Entwistle, A. and Racey, P. A. 1996. Timing of foraging flights of three species of bats in relation to insect activity and predation risk. - Oikos 76: 243-252.
    • Scanlon, A. T. and Petit, S. 2009. Effects of site, time, weather and light on urban bat activity and richness: considerations for survey effort. - Wildlife Res. 35: 821-834.
    • Stahlschmidt, P. and Brühl, C. A. 2012. Bats as bioindicators - the need of a standardized method for acoustic bat activity surveys. - M. Ecol. Evol. 3: 503-508.
    • Verboom, B. 1998. The use of edge habitats by commuting and foraging bats. - DLO Institute of Forestry and Nature Research, Netherlands.
    • Walsh, A. L., Barclay, R. M. and Mccracken, G. F. 2004. Designing bat-activity surveys for inventory and monitoring studies at local and regional scales. - In: Brigham, R. M., Kalko, E. K. V., Jones, G. Parsons, S. and Limpens, H. J. G. A. (eds) Bat echolocation research: tools, techniques and analysis. Bat Conservation International pp 157-166.
    • Walsh, A. L., Catto, C. M. C., Hutson, A. M., Racey, P. A., Richardson, P. and Langton, S. 2001. The UK's national bat monitoring programme. - DEFRA Final Report, London.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article