Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bahadori-Jahromi, Ali; Amoako-Attah, Joseph (2016)
Publisher: Molecular Diversity Preservation International and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Journal: Sustainability
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: CIBSE TM52, TD194-195, Renewable energy sources, CIBSE TM48, built, CIBSE overheating criteria, civil_eng, TJ807-830, building simulation, GE1-350, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, operative temperature, CIBSE TM49, Environmental sciences, Environmental effects of industries and plants, future weather
Abstract: Though uncertainties of input variables may have significant implications on building simulations, they are quite often not identified, quantified, or included in building simulations results.\ud This paper considers climatic deterministic, uncertainty, and sensitivity analysis through a series of simulations using the CIBSE UKCIP02 future weather years, CIBSE TM48 for design summer years (DSYs), and the latest CIBSE TM49 DSY future weather data which incorporates the UKCP09 projections to evaluate the variance and the impact of differing London future weather files on indoor operative temperature of a detached dwelling in the United Kingdom using the CIBSE TM52 overheating criteria. The work analyses the variability of comparable weather data set to identify the most influential weather parameters that contribute to thermal comfort implications for these dwellings. The choice of these weather files is to ascertain their differences, as their development is underpinned by different climatic projections. The overall pattern of the variability of the UKCIP02 and UKCP09 Heathrow weather data sets under Monte Carlo sensitivity consideration do not seem to be very different from each other. The deterministic results show that the operative temperatures of the UKCIP02 are slightly higher than those of UKCP09, with the UKCP09 having a narrow range of operative temperatures. The Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis quantified and affirmed the dry bulb and radiant temperatures as the most influential weather parameters that affect thermal comfort on dwellings.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Palme, M.; Isalgue, A.; Coch, H. Avoiding the Possible Impact of Climate Change on the Built Environment: The Importance of the Building's Energy Robustness. Buildings 2013, 3, 191-204. [CrossRef] Amoako-Attah, J.; B-Jahromi, A. Impact of Conservatory as passive solar design of UK dwellings. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. J. Eng. Sustain. 2016, 169, 198-213. [CrossRef]
    • Amoako-Attah, J.; B-Jahromi, A. Method comparison analysis of dwellings' temperatures in the UK. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. J. Eng. Sustain. 2015, 168, 16-27. [CrossRef]
    • Amoako-Attah, J.; B-Jahromi, A. Impact of standard construction specification on thermal comfort in UK dwellings. Adv. Environ. Res. 2014, 3, 253-281. [CrossRef]
    • 5. Amoako-Attah, J.; B-Jahromi, A. Impact of future climate change on UK building performance. Adv. Environ. Res. 2013, 2, 203-227. [CrossRef]
    • 6. Hulme, M.; Jenkins, G.L.; Lu, X.; Turnpenny, J.R.; Mitchell, T.D.; Jones, R.G.; Lowe, J.; Murphy, J.M.; Hassel, D.; Boorman, P.; et al. Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report; Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia: Norwich, UK, 2002.
    • 7. Jenkins, G.J.; Murphy, J.M.; Sexton, D.M.H.; Lowe, J.A.; Jones, P.; Kilsby, C.G. UK Climate Projections: Briefing Report; Met Office Hadley Centre: Exeter, UK, 2009.
    • 8. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. The Use of Climate Change Scenarios for Building Simulation: The CIBSE Future Weather Years; CIBSE TM48; Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers: London, UK, 2008.
    • 9. Williams, D.; Elghali, L.; France, C.; Wheeler, R.C. Projecting building energy demand using probabilistic weather conditions accounting for climate change. In Proceedings of the CIBSE Technical Symposium, DeMontfort University, Leicester, UK, 6-7 September 2011.
    • 10. Belcher, S.E.; Hacker, J.N.; Powell, D.S. Constructing design weather for future climates. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2005, 26, 49-61. [CrossRef]
    • 11. Mylona, A. The use of UKCP09 to produce weather files for building simulation. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2012, 33, 51-62. [CrossRef]
    • 12. Tian, W.; de Wilde, P. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of building performance using probabilistic climate projections: A UK case study. Autom. Constr. 2011, 20, 1096-1109. [CrossRef]
    • 13. Eames, M.; Kershaw, T.; Coley, D. On the creation of future probabilistic design weather years from UKCP09. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2011, 32, 127-142. [CrossRef]
    • 14. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Design Summer Years for London; CIBSE TM49; Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers: London, UK, 2009.
    • 15. Virk, G.; Mylona, A.; Mavrogianni, A.; Davies, M. Using the new CIBSE design summer years to assess overheating in London: Effect of the urban heat island on design. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 36, 115-128. [CrossRef]
    • 16. Gupta, R.; Gregg, M.; Du, H.; Williams, K. Evaluative application of UKCP09-based downscaled future years to simulate overheating risk in typical English homes. Structural Survey. Struct. Surv. 2013, 32, 231-252. [CrossRef]
    • 17. Smith, S.T.; Hanby, V.I. Methodologies for the generation of design summer years for building energy simulation using UKCP09 probabilistic climate projections. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2012, 33, 9-17. [CrossRef]
    • 18. Watkins, R.; Levermore, G.J.; Parkinson, J.B. Constructing a future weather file for use in building simulation using UKCP09 projections. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2011, 32, 293-299. [CrossRef]
    • 19. Dominguez-Munoz, F.; Cejudo-Lopez, J.M.; Carrillo-Andres, A. Uncertainty in peak cooling load calculations. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1010-1018. [CrossRef]
    • 20. Rodriguez, G.C.; Carrillo-Andres, A.; Dominguez-Munoz, F.; Cejudo-Lopez, J.M.; Zhang, Y. Uncertainties and sensitivity analysis in building energy simulation using macroparameters. Energy Build. 2013, 67, 79-87. [CrossRef]
    • 21. Spitz, C.; Mora, L.; Wurtz, E.; Jay, A. Practical application of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in building energy simulation using macro parameters. Energy Build. 2012, 67, 79-87.
    • 22. Handbook, A.F. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, ASHRAE Standard 55-2010. In American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers; American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2009.
    • 23. De Dear, R.J.; Akimoto, T.; Arens, E.A.; Brager, G.; Candido, C.; Cheong, K.W.D.; Li, B.; Nishihara, N.; Sekhar, S.C.; Tanabe, S.; et al. Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. Indoor Air 2013, 23, 442-461. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 24. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. The Limits of Thermal Comfort: Avoiding Overheating in European Buildings CIBSE TM52; Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers: London, UK, 2013.
    • 25. Nicol, F.; Humphreys, M.; Roaf, S. Adaptive Thermal Comfort: Principles and Practice; Routledge: London, UK, 2012.
    • 26. D'Ambrosio Alfano, F.R.; Olesen, B.W.; Palella, B.I.; Riccio, G. Thermal comfort: Design and assessment for energy saving. Energy Build. 2014, 81, 326-336. [CrossRef]
    • 27. De Dear, R.J.; Brager, G.S. Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans. 1998, 104, 145-167.
    • 28. Fanger, P.O. Calculation of thermal comfort: Introduction of a basic comfort equation. ASHRAE Trans. 1967, 73, 1-20.
    • 29. Nicol, J.F.; Raja, I.A.; Allaudin, A.; Jamy, G.N. Climatic variations in comfort temperatures: The Pakistan projects. Energy Build. 1999, 30, 261-279. [CrossRef]
    • 30. McCartney, K.J.; Nicol, F. Developing an adapting comfort algorithm for Europe; results of the SCATS project. Energy Build. 2002, 34, 623-635. [CrossRef]
    • 31. Ponni, M.; Baskar, R. A study of comfort temperature and thermal efficiency of buildings. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2015, 7, 1469-1477.
    • 32. Tian, W. A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 411-419. [CrossRef]
    • 33. Mavrogianni, A.; Wilkinson, P.; Davies, M.; Biddulph, P.; Oikonomou, E. Building Characteristics as determinants of propensity to high indoor summer temperatures in London dwellings. Build. Environ. 2012, 55, 117-130. [CrossRef]
    • 34. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. CIBSE Guide A-Environmental Design; Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers: London, UK, 2006.
    • 35. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Climate Change and the Indoor Environment: Impacts and Adaptation CIBSE TM36; Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers: London, UK, 2005.
    • 36. Banacos, P.C. Box and Whiskers Plots for Local Climate Datasets: Interpretation and Creation Using Excel 2007/2010. Available online: http://www.weather.gov/media/erh/ta2011-01.pdf (accessed on 30 September 2016).
    • 37. Storlie, C.B.; Swiler, L.P.; Helton, J.C.; Sallaberry, C.J. Implementation and evaluation of non-parametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis computationally demanding modules. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94, 1735-1763. [CrossRef]
    • 38. Hygh, J.S.; DeCarolis, J.F.; Hill, D.B.; Ranji Ranjithan, S. Multivariate regression as an energy assessment tool in early building design. Build. Environ. 2012, 57, 165-175. [CrossRef]
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article