Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bowman, Howard; Wyble, Brad; Chennu, Srivas; Craston, Patrick (2008)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QA76
There is considerable current interest in neural modelling of the attentional blink phenomenon. Two prominent models of this task are the Simultaneous Type Serial Token (ST2) model and the Locus Coeruleus Norepinephrine (LC-NE) model. The former of these generates a broad spectrum of behavioural data, while the latter provides a neurophysiologically detailed account. This paper explores the relationship between these two approaches. Specifically, we consider the spectrum of empirical phenomena that the two models generate, particularly emphasizing the need to generate a reciprocal relationship between bottom-up trace strength and the blink bottleneck. Then we discuss the implications of using ST2 token mechanisms in the LC-NE setting.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, A.K., 2005. Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134 (2), 258-281.
    • Anderson, A.K., Phelps, E.A., 2001. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 411 (6835), 305-309.
    • Aston-Jones, G., Cohen, J.D., 2005. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403-450.
    • Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Cohen, J., 2000. Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. Prog. Brain Res. 126, 165-182.
    • Battye, G., 2003. Connectionist Modelling of Attention and Anxiety. Unpublished PhD, The Medical Research Council's Cognition and Brain Sciences unit, Cambridge.
    • Bowman, H., Wyble, B., 2007. The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory. Psychol. Rev. 114 (1), 38-70.
    • Braver, T.S., Cohen, J.D., 2000. On the control of control: the role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In: Monsell, S., Driver, J. (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII; Control of Cognitive Processes. MIT Press, pp. 713-737.
    • Breitmeyer, B.G., Ehrenstein, A., Pritchard, K., Hiscock, M., Crisan, J., 1999. The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink. Percept. Psychophys. 61 (5), 798-809.
    • Chartier, S., Cousineau, D., Charbonneau, D. (2004). A Connectionist Model of the Attentional Blink Effect During a Rapid Serial Visual Task. In ICCM 2004, International Conference on Cognitive Modelling.
    • Chua, F.K., Goh, J., Hon, N., 2001. Nature of codes extracted during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (5), 1229-1242.
    • Chun, M.M., 1997a. Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Percept. Psychophys. 59 (8), 1191-1199.
    • Chun, M.M., 1997b. Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23 (3), 738-755.
    • Chun, M.M., Potter, M.C., 1995. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21 (1), 109-127.
    • Chun, M.M., Potter, M.C., 2000. The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In: Shapiro, K. (Ed.), Temporal Constraints in Human Information Processing. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
    • Coltheart, M., 1983. Iconic memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 302 (1110), 283-294.
    • Cowan, N., 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24 (1), 87-114.
    • Davelaar, E.J., Usher, M., 2004. An extended buffer model for active maintenance and selective updating. In: Bowman, H., Labiouse, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, vol. 15. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 3-14.
    • Dehaene, S., Sergent, C., Changeux, J.P., 2003. A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (14), 8520-8525.
    • Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., Sergent, C., 2006. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (5), 204-211.
    • Desimone, R., Duncan, J., 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222.
    • Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Shahab-Ghorashi, S.M., Enns, J.T., 2005. The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychol. Res. 69 (3), 191-200.
    • Enns, J.T., Di Lollo, V., 2000. What's new in visual masking? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (9), 345-352.
    • Fragopanagos, N., Kockelkoren, S., Taylor, J.G., 2005. A neurodynamic model of the attentional blink. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 (3), 568-586.
    • Frank, M.J., Loughry, B., O'Reilly, R.C., 2001. Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 1 (2), 137-160.
    • German, D.C., Walker, B.S., Manaye, K., Smith, W.K., Woodward, D.J., North, A.J., 1988. The human locus coeruleus: computer reconstruction of cellular distribution. J. Neurosci. 8 (5), 1776-1788.
    • Giesbrecht, B., Di Lollo, V., 1998. Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (5), 1454-1466.
    • Gilzenrat, M.S., Holmes, B.D., Rajkowski, J., Aston-Jones, G., Cohen, J.D., 2002. Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance. Neural Netw. 15 (4-6), 647-663.
    • Jolicoeur, P., 1998. Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions. Mem. Cogn. 26 (5), 1014-1032.
    • Kanwisher, N.G., 1987. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27 (2), 117-143.
    • Kanwisher, N.G., 1991. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17 (2), 404-421.
    • Keysers, C., Perrett, D.I., 2002. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (3), 120-125.
    • Keysers, C., Xiao, D.-X., Foldiak, P., Perrett, D.I., 2005. Out of sight but not out of mind: the neurophysiology of iconic memory in the superior temporal sulcus. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22 (3/4), 316-332.
    • Kranczioch, C., Debener, S., Engel, A.K., 2003. Event-related potential correlates of the attentional blink phenomenon. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 17 (1), 177-187.
    • Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K., Shapiro, K.L., 1996. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 383, 616-618.
    • Marois, R., Chun, M.M., Gore, J.C., 2000. Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron 28 (1), 299-308.
    • Martens, S., Munneke, J., Smid, H., Johnson, A., 2006. Quick minds don't blink: electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in attentional selection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18 (9), 1423-1438.
    • McLaughlin, E.N., Shore, D.I., Klein, R.M., 2001. The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., A 54 (1), 169-196.
    • Nakayama, K., Mackeben, M., 1989. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Res. 29 (11), 1631-1647.
    • Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., Cohen, J.D., 2005a. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol. Bull. 131 (4), 510-532.
    • Nieuwenhuis, S., Gilzenrat, M.S., Holmes, B.D., Cohen, J.D., 2005b. The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: a neurocomputational theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134 (3), 291-307.
    • Olivers, C.N., 2007. The time course of attention: it is better than we thought. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16 (1), 11-15.
    • Olivers, C.N., van der Stigchel, S., Hulleman, J., 2005. Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychol. Res. 8, 1-14.
    • O'Reilly, R.C., Munakata, Y., 2000. Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. MIT Press.
    • Potter, M.C., 1993. Very short-term conceptual memory. Mem. Cogn. 21 (2), 156-161.
    • Potter, M.C., Staub, A., O'Conner, D.H., 2002. The time course for competition for attention: attention is initially labile. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (5), 1149-1162.
    • Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., Arnell, K.M., 1992. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18 (3), 849-860.
    • Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., 2001. Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology 38 (2), 165-174.
    • Seiffert, A.E., Di Lollo, V., 1997. Low-level masking in the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23 (4), 1061-1073.
    • Sessa, P., Luria, R., Verleger, R., Dell'Acqua, R., 2006. P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: further evidence for second target processing postponement. Brain Res. 1137, 131-139.
    • Shapiro, K.L., Caldwell, J., Sorensen, R.E., 1997a. Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual “cocktail party” effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23 (2), 504-514.
    • Shapiro, K.L., Driver, J., Ward, R., Sorensen, R.E., 1997b. Priming from the attentional blink: a failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychol. Sci. 8 (2), 95-102.
    • Sperling, G., 1960. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 74, 1-29.
    • Usher, M., Cohen, J.D., Servan-Schreiber, D., Rajkowski, J., Aston-Jones, G., 1999. The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. Science 283 (5401), 549-554.
    • Visser, T.A., Bischof, W.F., Di Lollo, V., 1999. Attentional switching spatial and non spatial domains: evidence from the attentional blink. Psychol. Bull. 125 (4), 458-469.
    • Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., 2002. Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9 (4), 739-743.
    • Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., Shapiro, K.L., 1998. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (6), 1656-1674.
    • Wyble, B., Bowman, H., 2005. Computational and experimental evaluation of the attentional blink: testing the Simultaneous Type Serial Token model. In: Bara, B.G., Barsalou, L.W., Bucciarelli, M. (Eds.), CogSci 2005, XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society through Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 2371-2376.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article