Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Arshad, F; Nnamoko, NA; Wilson, J; Roy, B; Taylor, MJ
Publisher: IGI Global
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QA75
Copyright © 2015 IGI Global. This paper describes an early stage usability study conducted on a prototype system designed to capture and analyse Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) activities. The system - PROMS 2.0, was developed by Bluespier for the trauma and orthopaedic department in Trafford Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom (UK). The Centre for Health and Social Care Informatics (CHaSCI), Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) examined the system without real users, identified potential usability issues and suggested possible solutions for improvements before final release by Bluespier. Three different approaches were adopted for evaluating user interface (UI) design without users. The first approach is the Cognitive Walkthrough (CW), a task-oriented technique capable of identifying issues through action sequence required to perform a task. The second approach is action analysis which predicts the time a skilled user would need to perform a task. The third approach is heuristic evaluation which tends to identify problems based on recognised standards. Results support the argument from relevant cognitive psychology theories and user-centric design principles that UI evaluation without real users is a useful tool in yielding rapid output for subsequent enhancement. It is concluded that semi-parallel design concept could be the key to timely delivery of software design projects.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • British Elbow & Shoulder Society (BESS). (2013).
    • Abstracts for the 24thAnnual Scientific Meeting, BESS. Shoulder & Elbow, 5(4), 276-294.
    • doi:10.1111/sae.12036 Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980). The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM, 23(7), 396-410. doi:10.1145/358886.358895 Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction (p.
    • 469). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Devlin, N. J., Appleby, J., Buxton, M., & Vallanceowen, A. (2010). Getting the most out of proms.
    • Eikemeier, C., Grütter, R., & Heitmann, K. (2000).
    • A new generation of remote data entry: Using WAPphones in clinical trials. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 77, 338-342. PMID:11187569 John, E. B. (n.d.). Welcome to CogTool. Retrieved November 12, 2013, from http://cogtool.hcii.cs.cmu.
    • edu/ Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. (1994). Evaluating the Design Without Users. In Task-centered User Interface Design: A Practical Introduction (pp. 41 - 74).
    • Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a humancomputer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 338-348. doi:10.1145/77481.77486 National Health Service. (2008). Standard NHS Contract for Acute Services: Schedule 5. Standard Deed of Variation. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.dudley.nhs.uk/sections/publications/ documents%5CFOI29384907574.pdf Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '92 (pp. 373-380). New York, New York, USA:ACM Press. doi:10.1145/142750.142834 Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative user-interface design.
    • Computer, 26(11), 32-41. doi:10.1109/2.241424 Nielsen, J. (1993). The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. In Usability Engineering (pp. 71-113). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. doi:10.1016/B978- 0-08-052029-2.50007-3 Nielsen, J., & Faber, J. M. (1996). Improving system usability through parallel design. Computer, 29(2), 29-35. doi:10.1109/2.485844 Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability Inspection Methods (p. 413). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok