Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gofas, Andreas (2001)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: D901, HG
After a period of neglect, if not hostility, toward ideational explanations we are now faced with a burgeoning literature on the role of ideas. Indeed, as Jacobsen (1995: 283) notes, it now seems obligatory for every work in political economy to consider the ‘power of ideas’ hypothesis –even if only then to dismiss it. This paper joins the current wave of ideational scholarship in examining the role of ideas in the construction of EMU. However, although the analytical starting-point is one of sharing with current ideational approaches a dissatisfaction with rationalist theorising that ‘black-boxes’ the processes of interest formation, the rationale of this paper emerges from another dissatisfaction; a dissatisfaction with the way these approaches have conceptualised ideas. It is argued that the current wave of ideational scholarship has not only failed to take ideas seriously (Blyth, 1997), but that it has also created a new ideational orthodoxy that reproduces either the rationalist bias of separating ideas and interests, by treating them as competing variables whose relative explanatory weight is to be methodologically checked, or the institutionalist bias that assigns ontological primacy to institutions. In an attempt to move beyond these deficiencies in the examination of how the interaction between ideas and interests produced the ideational consensus around the sets of ideas that EMU amalgamates, it tries to clearly specify the EMU ideas and analyse the ideational entrepreneurs involved and ideational transfer mechanisms at work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adler, E. and Haas, P. M. (1992)'Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program,' International Organisation, 46:1, Special Issue, pp.367-90.
    • Berman, S. (2001) 'Review Article: Ideas, Norms, and Culture in Political Analysis,' Comparative Politics, 231-50.
    • Bernstein, S. (2000) 'Ideas, Social Structure and the Compromise of Environmentalism,' European Journal of International Relations, 6:4, 464-512.
    • Blyth, M. W. (1997) 'Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy,' Comparative Politics 29:2, pp.229-50.
    • Blyth, M. W. (1998) 'From Ideas and Institutions to Ideas and Interests: Beyond the 'Usual Suspects'?' Paper presented at the 11th Conference of Europeanists, Baltimore.
    • Dyson, K. (1999) 'Economic and Monetary Union in Europe: A transformation of governance,' in Beate Kohler-Koch and Rainer Eising, eds. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (London: Routledge), pp98-118.
    • Dyson, K. and K. Featherstone (1999) The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    • Dyson, K.; K. Featherstone and G. Michalopoulos (1998) 'Strapped to the Mast: EU central bankers between global financial markets and regional integration,' in William D. Coleman and Geoffrey R. D. Underhill, eds. Regionalism and Global Economic Integration (London: Routledge).
    • Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests in International Society. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
    • Fligstein, N. and Mara-Drita, I. (1996). 'How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union,' American Journal of Sociology, 102:1, 1-33.
    • Goldstein, J. and R. O. Keohane (1993) 'Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework,' in J. Goldstein and R. O. Keohane, eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
    • Haas, P. M. (1991) 'Collective learning: Some theoretical speculations,' in Breslauer, G. W. and Tetlock, P. E., eds. Learning in US and Soviet Foreign Policy (Boulder, Co.: Westview Press).
    • Haas, P. M. (1992) 'Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination,' International Organisation, 46:1, Special Issue on epistemic communities, pp.1-35.
    • Hall, P. A. (1989). 'Conclusion: The Politics of Keynesian Ideas,' in Peter Hall, ed. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
    • Hall, P. A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996) 'Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,' Political Studies, XLIV, pp.936-967.
    • Hay, C. (1999) 'What Place for Ideas in the Structure-Agency Debate? Globalisation as a 'Process Without a Subject',' Paper presented at the annual conference of the British International Studies Association.
    • Heisenberg, D. (1999) The Mark of the Bundesbank: Germany's Role in European Monetary Cooperation (London: Lynne Rienner).
    • Hix, S. (1994) 'The study of the European Community: the challenge to comparative politics,' West European Politics, 17:1, pp.1-30.
    • Jabko, N. (1999) 'In the name of the Market: how the European Commission paved the way for monetary union,' Journal of European Public Policy, 6:3, pp.475-95.
    • Jacobsen, J. K. (1995) 'Much Ado About Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy,' World Politics, 47, pp.283-310.
    • Laffey, M and J. Weldes (1997) 'Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations,' European Journal of International Relations, 3:2, pp.193-237.
    • Levitt, M. and C. Lord (2000) The Political Economy of Monetary Union (London: MacMillan).
    • Marcussen, M. (2000). Ideas and Elites: The Social Construction of Economic and Monetary Union (Aalborg: Aalborg University Press).
    • Marsh, D. and M. Smith (2000) 'Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Dialectical Approach,' Political Studies 48, 4-21.
    • McNamara, K. R. (1998) The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
    • Moravcsik, A. (1999a) 'The Choice for Europe: Current Commentary and Future Research,' Journal of European Public Policy, 6:1, pp.168-79.
    • Moravcsik, A. (1999b) 'The Future of European Integration Studies: Social Science or Social Theory,' Millennium: Journal of International Relations, 28:2, pp.371-91.
    • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    • Nye, J. S. Jr.(1987) 'Nuclear learning and US-Soviet security regimes,' International Organisation, 41, pp.371-402.
    • Parsons, C. (2000) 'Domestic Interests, Ideas and Integration: Lessons from the French Case,' Journal of Common Market Studies, 38:1, pp.45-70.
    • Pollack, M.A. (1997) 'Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community,' International Organisation, 51:1, pp.99-134.
    • Radaelli, C. M. (1999a) 'The Public Policy of the European Union: whither Politics of Expertise?' Journal of European Public Policy, 6:5, pp. 757-774.
    • Radaelli, C. M. (1999b) Technocracy in the European Union (London: Longman).
    • Radaelli, C. M. (2000) 'Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy,' Governance, 13:1.
    • Verdun, A. (1999) 'The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: an epistemic community?' Journal of European Public Policy, 6:2, pp.308-328.
    • Wallace, H. (1999) in 'Review section symposium: The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht,' Journal of European Public Policy, 6:1, 155-9.
    • Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    • Wolf, D. (1999). 'Neofunctionalism and Intergovernmentalism Amalgamated: The Case of EMU,' Paper presented at the Conference on 'Conceptualising the New Europe: European Monetary Integration and Beyond,' University of Victoria, B.C. Canada.
    • Yee, A. S. (1996) 'The causal effects of ideas on policies,' International Organisation, 50:1, pp.69-108.
    • Yee, A. S.(1997) 'Thick Rationality and the Missing 'Brute Fact': The Limits of Rationalist Incorporations of Norms and Ideas,' The Journal of Politics, 59:4, pp.1001-39.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article