Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hegarty, Kieron
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: BF, H1
Homelessness is experienced by considerable numbers of people throughout the UK. Research convincingly demonstrates the multiple and frequent difficulties that people who are homeless face, including: limited support networks, mental and physical health difficulties, problems associated with substance use, and social exclusion. There is a lack of research however, that explores their strengths, resilience, and ability to cope with adversity. Many services arguably parallel this trend and focus on risk management and treatment strategies that target perceived pathology and vulnerability characteristics. The study contributed to strengths-based research and explored the psychological processes associated with a sense of manageability of people who were homeless. This unique line of research enquiry was guided by the study’s systematic review. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight adult males who temporarily resided at a homeless hostel in Wales. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to identify themes. Processes that both enhanced and detracted from manageability were inferred. In particular, self-efficacy and self-esteem seemed important to sustain and promote the well-being of participants, and influenced actions towards future transition out of homelessness. There was evidence to suggest that these constructs were closely associated with participants’ relationship experiences. The study supports the core components of Rutter’s (1985; 2013) conceptualization of resilience. Intervention strategies were discussed in relation to the findings, but primarily, services were encouraged to promote supportive relationships for homeless people, as these can foster self-efficacy and self-esteem processes that are hypothesised to mediate resilience, and encourage people’s social inclusion. Further culturally sensitive research of resilience processes is recommended.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 410.
    • Seligman, M.E.P., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., and Gillham, J. (1995). The Optimistic Child. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Shaw, M., Dorling, D., & Brimblecombe, N. (1999). Life chances in Britain by housing wealth and for the homeless and vulnerably housed. Environment and Planning A, 31(12), 2239-2248.
    • Shelter. (2008). Good Practice: Briefing. A Long Way from Home. London: Shelter.
    • Smith, E.R., Mackie, D.M. (2007). Social Psychology (3rd Ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
    • Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Smith, J.A.
    • (Ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, 53- 80.
    • Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method, Research. London: Sage.
    • Smokowski, P.R., Reynolds, A.J., & Bezruczko, N. (2000). Resilience and protective factors in adolescence: an autobiographical perspective from disadvantaged youth. Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 425-448.
    • Spence, S., (2004). Cognitive dysfunction in homeless adults: a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97, 375-379.
    • Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: Cabinet Office Stanton, A. L., & Snider, P. R. (1993). Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: A prospective study. Health Psychology, 12(1), 16.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article