Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Judge, S.; Friday, M. (2011)
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose – “Ambiguous keyboards” and “disambiguation processes” are becoming universally recognised through the popularisation of “predictive text messaging” on mobile phones. As this paper shows, although originating in the AT and AAC fields, these terms and techniques no longer appear to be widely understood or adopted by practitioners or users. The purpose of this paper is to introduce these techniques, discussing the research and theory around them, and to suggest them as AT and AAC strategies to be considered by practitioners and users. \ud \ud Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper that describes the use of ambiguous keyboards and disambiguation. The hypothesis of the paper is that ambiguous keyboards and disambiguation processes offer potential to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of AAC and should thus be considered further in research and practice. \ud \ud Findings – The two broad methods for removing the ambiguity from the output of an ambiguous keyboard are presented. A summary of the literature around the use of disambiguation processes provided and the use of disambiguation processes for AAC discussed. \ud \ud Originality/value – This paper suggests that ambiguity should be adopted as a characteristic of an AAC keyboard as should the method of removing ambiguity – namely either coding or a disambiguation process.\ud \ud \ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arnott, J., 1992. Probabilistic character disambiguation for reduced keyboards using small text samples.
    • Augmentative & Alternative Communication, pp.238-253.
    • Black, R. et al., 2008. Introducing the PhonicStick: Preliminary evaluation with seven children. In Montreal, Canada: ISAAC.
    • Foulds, R., 1987. Statistical disambiguation of multi-character keys applied to reduce motor requirements for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, pp.192-195.
    • Glaser, R., 1981. A telephone communication aid for the deaf,“. Proceedings of the Johns Hopkins First National Search for Applications of Personal Computers to Aid the Handicapped.
    • Gong, J. & Tarasewich, P., 2005. Alphabetically constrained keypad designs for text entry on mobile devices. In Portland, Oregon, USA: ACM, pp. 211-220.
    • Hansen, J.P., Hansen, D.W. & Johansen, A.S., 2001. Bringing Gaze-based Interaction Back to Basics.
    • Available at: http://www.it-c.dk/research/EyeGazeInteraction/Papers/Paulin_Hansen_Johansen_2001.pdf .
    • Hansen, J.P., Lund, H. & Itoh, H.A.& K., 2006. Gaze communication systems for people with ALS. In pp. 35- 38. Available at: http://www.cogain.org/w/images/a/a2/ALS_Workshop_Yokohama2006.pdf .
    • Harbusch, K. & Kuhn, M., 2003. An Evaluation Study of Two-Button Scanning with Ambiguous Keyboards.
    • In AATE 2003. AAATE. Available at: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~harbusch/harbusch-kuehn-aaate-2003.pdf .
    • Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi= .
    • Hasan, S. & Harbusch, Karin, 2003. N-Best Hidden Markov Model Supertagging to Improve Typing on an Ambiguous Keyboard. Available at: http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/TAG+7/papers/hasan.pdf .
    • Higginbotham, D.J. et al., 2007. Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), pp.243-257.
    • James, C. & Long, M., 2000. Bringing text input beyond the desktop. In ACM Press, pp. 49-50.
    • Johansen, A.S. & Hansen, J.P., 2006. Augmentative and alternative communication: the future of text on the move. Universal Access in the Information Society, V5(2), pp.125-149.
    • Johnson, A. & Hagstad, R., 1981. DTMF telecommunications for the deaf and speech impaired,“.
    • Judge, S. & Colven, D., 2006. Switch access to technology - A comprehensive Guide. , pp.1-56. Available at: http://ace-centre.hostinguk.com/assets/Product Downloads/SwitchScanningMaster_8_472.pdf .
    • King, J. et al., 1995. Small talk in adult conversations: Implications for AAC vocabulary selection.
    • Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(4), pp.260-264.
    • King, M.T. et al., 1995. Reduced keyboard disambiguating system patent. Available at: http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6011554 .
    • Koester, H.H. & Levine, S.P., 1994. Modeling the speed of text entry with a word prediction interface.
    • Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on [see also IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation], 2(3), pp.177-187.
    • Kondraske, G. & Shennib, A., 1986. Character pattern recognition for a telecommunication aid for the deaf.
    • IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 33(3), pp.366-370.
    • Kreifeldt, J., Levine, Sl & Iyengar, C., 1989. Reduced keyboard designs using disambiguation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, 1, pp.441-444.
    • Kushler, C., 1998. AAC USING A REDUCED KEYBOARD. Available at: http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/csun_98/csun98_140.htm .
    • Levine, Sh & Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., 1990. Customised text entry devices for motor-impaired users.
    • Applied ergonomics, 21(1), pp.55-62.
    • Levine, Sh et al., 1987. Multi-character key text entry using computer disambiguation. RESNA 10th Annual Conference, San Jose, California, pp.177-178.
    • MacKenzie, I. S & Soukoreff, R.W., 2002. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, pp.147-198.
    • Mackenzie, I.S. & Felzer, T., 2010. SAK: Scanning ambiguous keyboard for efficient one-key text entry. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 17.
    • MacKenzie, I. Scott et al., 2001. LetterWise: prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input. In pp. 111- 120. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi= .
    • MacKenzie, I. Scott & Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko, 2007. Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies), Morgan Kaufmann.
    • Minneman, S., 1985. A simplified Touch-Tone telecommunication aid for deaf and hearing impaired individuals. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technology.
    • Office for National Statistics, 2007. Use of ICT at Home. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1710 .
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article